Suchergebnisse

Artykuł jest próbą wskazania rozwiązań, które powinny być stosowane w ramach podejmowania przez pracodawców decyzji o przetwarzaniu danych biometrycznych. Łączenie przetwarzania danych biometrycznych z prowadzeniem monitoringu jest, na gruncie rozwiązań wynikających z RODO i prawa krajowego, niezwykle skomplikowane. Spełnienie wszystkich warunków koniecznych do legalizacji takiego procesu przetwarzania danych jest, przynajmniej co do zasady, możliwe jedynie w bardzo ograniczonej liczbie przypadków i każdorazowo wymaga indywidualnej analizy dopuszczalności. W orzecznictwie sądowym od niedawna podejmuje się próby reinterpretacji wcześniejszego, niezwykle restrykcyjnego podejścia do przetwarzania danych biometrycznych.

DATA PROTECTION OFFICER AND DATA PROTECTION INSPECTOR ON THE BACKGROUND OF NATIONAL AND THE EU REGULATIONS — SELECTED ISSUESThe main aim of this article is the attempt to conduct acomparative analysis of selected issues from the relationship between ABI Data Protection Officer/IOD Data Protection Inspecor and ADO Controller. The test area includes mainly issues related to the establishment of inspection bodies. In particular, this problem when it depends on the discretion of the ADO and in which cases turns into alegal obligation. The description includes the conditions set for the candidate for the ABI/IOD, and the process of their verification. Apart from main considerations the article provides also comments on the nature of the relationship between them and the ADO.

The notion of the judicial control of administration exercised by specially designated authorities has been present in Poland for a long time. The first proposals in this area appeared as early as 1807, and were implemented on the basis of the French practice. In the years 1922–1939 there existed the Supreme Administrative Court, which determined the lawfulness of decisions and orders by public administration bodies in cases of breaches of particular rights or the imposion of duties without any legal grounds. It functioned as a court of appeal. After 1944 the administrative judicial system was dissolved. The solutions based on the three principal characteristics of administrative judicial system, i.e. the separation from common courts, the existence of a system of administrative courts, and the independence of their judges, were re-established in 1980. Also, a separate judicial authority was restored, referred to as the Chief Administrative Court, operating as a court of appeal with general material jurisdiction covering administrative decisions and cases of the inaction of administrative authorities despite their duty to issue such decisions. The scope of cognition of the Chief Administrative Court was gradually extending, and in 2004 a two-level model of the administrative judicial system was established, operating on an appeal basis. This model sparks off many controversies as to its practical application. The lengthiness of its proceedings is another problem of the Polish administrative judicial system. ; Artykuł nie zawiera abstraktu w języku polskim

THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL IN LATVIAThe Latvian Judicial Council Tieslietu padome is a central non-constitutional body of the state, functionally connected with the judiciary. It consists not only of judges but also representatives of the legal professions and representatives of other authorities i.e. the Minister of Justice tieslietu ministrs, the Prosecutor General ģenerālprokurors, the Chairman of the Parliamentary Legal Committee Saeimas Juridiskās komisijas priekšsēdētājs or their deputies. The mixed composition of the Council does not disqualify it as an independent body that can potentially eff ectively perform tasks related to the protection of the independence of the courts and the independence of the judiciary. The Latvian Judicial Council is, however, a body with a very wide spectrum of activity, which, although it does not follow directly from the constitution Satversme, allows it to freely exercise not only its applicant both in relation to Saeima and the Constitutional Tribunal and opinion-making but also decision-making functions on conceptual issues and organisational judiciary and matters related to the career path of judges. The statutory nature of competences allows for their scope to be shaped quite freely, giving the possibility of adapting the Council's tasks to the changing needs of the state — which of course can be seen as an advantage as well as a disadvantage of the Tieslietu padome model.