Comprehensive sovereign agency?: China's model of international recognition
In: The Chinese journal of international politics, Volume 14, Issue 1, p. 87-126
ISSN: 1750-8924
7 results
Sort by:
In: The Chinese journal of international politics, Volume 14, Issue 1, p. 87-126
ISSN: 1750-8924
World Affairs Online
In: Asian studies review, Volume 44, Issue 4, p. 671-690
ISSN: 1467-8403
In: ASIECO-D-23-00146
SSRN
In: Materials and design, Volume 126, p. 91-97
ISSN: 1873-4197
In: Ecotoxicology and environmental safety: EES ; official journal of the International Society of Ecotoxicology and Environmental safety, Volume 234, p. 113396
ISSN: 1090-2414
Systolic/diastolic blood pressure of 130–139/80–89 mm Hg has been defined as stage I hypertension by the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) hypertension guidelines. Drug treatment is recommended for stage I hypertensive patients aged ≥65 years without cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines, but not in the 2018 Chinese guidelines. However, the cost-effectiveness of drug treatment among this subgroup of Chinese patients is unclear. This study developed a microsimulation model to compare costs and effectiveness of drug treatment and non-drug treatment for the subgroup of stage I hypertensive patients over a lifetime horizon from a government affordability perspective. Event rates of mortality and cardiovascular complications were estimated from three cohorts in Chinese population. Costs and health utilities were obtained from national statistics report and published literature. The model predicted that drug treatment generated quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of 13.52 and associated with expected costs of $6825 in comparison with 13.81 and $7328 produced by non-drug treatment over a lifetime horizon among stage I hypertensive patients aged ≥65 years without CVD. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $8836/QALY (the gross domestic product per capita in 2017), drug treatment only had a 1.8% probability of being cost-effective compared with non-drug treatment after 10000 probabilistic simulations. Sensitivity analysis of treatment costs, benefits expected from treatment, health utilities, and discount rates did not change the results. Our results suggested that drug treatment was not cost-effective compared to non-drug treatment for stage I hypertensive patients aged ≥65 years without CVD in China.
BASE
In: CELL-HOST-MICROBE-D-22-00063
SSRN