Suchergebnisse

AbstractThis article explores 'post(s)' perspective understandings for the 21st century social work. Drawing mainly on post-debates, this article argues that human beings and their societies will evolve in unimagined ways in the future than these have been in all of their previous historical periods. Social work therefore must re-invent and re-adjust itself in the rest of the 21st century. Such re-invention and re-adjustment, however, will pivot around some complex theoretical narratives concerning to the 'post(s)' contexts and conditions of the 21st century.

This article is a critical autoethnographic investigation in which I explore development and social work vis-à-vis my own life episodes. I examine various tensions, for example, (1) becoming and being a colonial development subject; (2) encountering social work and compliance to it; (3) a U-turn, in disagreement with social work; and (4) a doctoral journey, reinvigorating my 'social worker self' through conceptualisation of a model of 'decolonised, developmental social work'. This autoethnography leads me to critical discourses not only to question development and social work but also to uncover the 'sense of (my) becoming and being' regarding those two.

Disintegration of the Soviet state was unanticipated in Central Asia and the new independent states were unprepared. The end of central planning in the late 1980s led to transitional recession and this got worse with the dissolution of the USSR. In this difficult situation, the five countries moved at different paces to stabilize their economies and establish market-based system. During transition era, Central Asian states introduced stabilization and structural reforms in the form of monetary policy, introduction of national currencies, price liberalization, privatization and fiscal reforms. Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan lead by introducing various reforms while Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan lagged behind and were slow reformers. Tajikistan was one state that suffered due to internal civil war. These stabilization and structural reforms produced mixed results for Central Asian states. Present study will provide an overview of the journey of 25 years of the five Central Asian states since independence, their experience with the reforms and their performance in the region.

The purpose of this article is to assess the Russian banking system for the period 1991–2015. After the disintegration of the Soviet Union, Russia introduced economic reforms to move from a centrally planned economy to a market economy, and banking reforms were part of it. During early years of transition, Russia suffered from negative growth rate: 1998 and 2008 crises. The entire Russian economy, including the banking system, got affected. Therefore, it is essential to know how the Russian banking system performed in these 25 years. The study found that the Russian banking system performance was not satisfactory until 1998–1999; from 2000 onwards, the system showed some signs of resilience. The Russian banking system is largely concentrated and dominated by state-owned banks with 58.4 per cent of share of the total banking assets and 57 per cent share of the total banking capital in comparison to foreign-owned and privately owned banks. Banks are largely concentrated in the regions of Moscow and St. Petersburg in comparison to Ural, Siberia and Russian Far East. Macroeconomic indicators of the Russian banking sector, including banking sector assets, capital, loans, securities and household deposits as per cent to GDP, revealed a rising trend. This indicates the ability of the banking sector to create loans and attract depositors by maintaining their trust in the banking system. Return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE) and non-performing loans (NPL) are the main drivers of profitability, and the trend shows a low growth rate in ROA and equity and high growth rate in NPL, which are of major concern for banking system health.

Nepali social work has Western liberal roots and traditions that impose cultural imperialism, professional sectarianism, and political colonization. There is a mismatch between what is taught in social work education programs in Nepal and Nepali culture. Further, this borrowed social work concept is out of step with the structural problems that Nepali people face on a daily basis, such as casteism, ethnocentrism, poverty, and exclusion. In this study, being inclined to critical pedagogy and decolonization discourse, I argue that Nepali social workers should emphasize and engage in decolonizing social work practice in Nepal. It must listen to the voice of the people at the grassroots and engage in 'people-centred development' to address structural problems perpetuating injustice and inequality in Nepal.

This paper offers the 6 A's model of social worker associations and COVID-19, which includes (i) 'Apprehend', (ii) 'act', (iii) 'advocate', (iv) 'alliance', (v) 'an emphasis on solidarity and resilience' and (vi) 'a future prospect'. The model is based on the findings of qualitative analysis of social worker associations' reports on COVID-19. It also offers insights that can be utilised in similar crises in the future.

Abstract
Despite social work's about three decades of history and most populations being at risk of multiple natural disasters, Nepali social workers are yet to establish their foothold in the sector of disaster in Nepal. Part of this has happened due to ineffective curriculum on disaster and social work. And hence, this article proposes how the curriculum for disaster and social work can be advanced in the future.

A plethora of discussion informs decolonising social work. However, how social work can be decolonised from women's perspective is still unexplored. Using the context of Nepal as a case study, this article theoretically explores 'the what', 'the why' and 'the how' of decolonising social work from women's standpoint. It is hoped this analysis will initiate and contribute to the critical debate on women, social work and decolonisation in Nepal and elsewhere.

COVID-19 has shifted Australia's social service delivery. Understanding the impact on workplace relationships is key. This article used a small-scale sample of social workers ( N = 37) to explore workplace friendship experiences while teleworking. Participants reported opportunities for friendships during COVID-19 but reported ongoing personal and professional concerns.