Suchergebnisse

AbstractThe ups and downs of COVID-19 were motivated by the neglect of the rule of law. China was the first country to be affected by COVID-19 as well as a country that managed to overcome it. This success is the result of the hard work of the Chinese government and its people. The theory initiated by Seidman emphasizes the existence of a good legal culture, but every rule of law that is successfully enforced in one place cannot necessarily be applied elsewhere. The purpose of this study was to find out the methods of preventing the spread of COVID-19 used by China and their relevance to other countries in the application of these methods. This is done by using Seidman's theory as an analytical knife. This research method is qualitative-normative literature-based. The results showed that China implemented a system of lockdown and Chinese Medicine (CM).Keywords: Coping with COVID-19, legal culture, Seidman's theory. AbstrakPasang-surut COVID-19 dilatarbelakangi adanya pengabaian aturan hukum. Cina merupakan negara yang pertama kali terkena dampak COVID-19 sekaligus sebagai negara yang berhasil menanggulanginya. Keberhasilan tersebut merupakan hasil dari adanya kerja keras yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah Cina dan masyarakatnya. Teori yang digagas oleh Seidman menekankan adanya budaya hukum yang baik, namun setiap aturan hukum yang berhasil diberlakukan di suatu tempat tidak semerta-merta bisa terapkan oleh tempat lain. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui metode pencegahan penyebaran COVID-19 yang digunakan oleh Cina dan relevansinya dengan negara-negara lain dalam penerapan metode tersebut. Demikian dilakukan dengan menggunakan teori Seidman sebagai pisau analisis. Metode penelitian ini adalah kualitatif-normatif yang berbasis kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Cina menerapkan sistem lockdown dan Chinese Medicine (CM).Kata Kunci: Penanggulangan COVID-19, budaya hukum, teori Seidman.

Determination procedure of the beginning of Islamic months in Indonesia is done through isbat convened by Ministry of Religious Affairs. The result is considered as the official decision of government. In Malaysia, the determination is preceded by the execution of ru'yah set by the officials of Keeper of the Rulers' Seal. The falak data are prepared by the Falak Unit at the Department of Islamic Development, the Mufti Members of the States of Malaysia as the practitioners. The results are announced by appointed officers from Mufti and Falak experts. The effort of the Indonesian Government on the unification of beginning of Islamic months determination is by establishing the Organization of Ḥisâb Ru'yah. One of its tasks and functions is to seek the unification of the beginning of Islamic months' determination through several programs. Whereas Malaysian Government does it by synchronizing understanding about the beginning of Islamic months' determination and after that relying on King's decision whether there will be strict sanction related to dissimilarity of the beginning of Islamic months' determination.

The emergence of criteria made by the Minister of Religion of Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore (MABIMS) in the determination of the beginning of the Islamic month which was the result of the meeting of the Southeast Asian ministers of religion, namely Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore which was first held in 1989 in Brunei. The meeting discussed cooperation in the field of hisab ru'yat between the four countries. In Indonesia, the MABIMS criterion is better known as the hisab imkān al-ru'yah method and was discussed for the first time in 1998 in March by hisab and ru'yat experts and representatives of Islamic social organizations - such as Muhammadiyah, NU, Persis, Al- Ershad and others. The deliberation that took place on September 28, 1998 resulted in a decision on 8 criteria for MABIMS in Indonesia. However, in reality the Indonesian government is considered inconsistent with the application of the MABIMS Criteria. According to the initial assumption, Indonesian researchers sometimes prefer the use of rukyat rather than using the MABIMS criteria reckoning. Meanwhile, Brunei Darussalam was impressed with Indonesia when it applied the MABIMS criteria inconsistently, because Brunei Darussalam only applied the MABIMS Criteria reckoning in the determination of the beginning of the Islamic month apart from Ramadan, Shawwal and Dzulhijjah. This research is a normative type of research using a qualitative approach, using primary and secondary data in the study. This research resulted in: First, the two countries only apply in the months other than Ramadan, Syawal and Dzulhijjah, while the determination of the first three months of Islam uses the guidelines of rukyatul hilal. Second, in terms of the validity of the application of the MABIMS Criteria in Indonesia and Brunei Darusslam according to fiqh and astronomy, it is permissible to use the approach of observational data or rukyatul hilal in the field.