Film review
In: Asian studies review, Band 21, Heft 2-3, S. 277-279
ISSN: 1467-8403
8 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Asian studies review, Band 21, Heft 2-3, S. 277-279
ISSN: 1467-8403
In: Asian studies review: journal of the Asian Studies Association of Australia, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 170-172
ISSN: 1035-7823
"This book improves the understanding of recent developments, affiliations, transformations and convergences, in the "Digital Age'" which raise significant questions, and concerns, about the pursuit of social justice in the 21st century at multiple levels of the information and knowledge society; about the role of governments, networks and organizations, teams and work groups; about integrity in the use and application of information systems and digital media; and about trust at the level of individuals as actors in the networked and digital environments in the 21st century"--
The question of the ethical life is arguably one of the most compelling, and urgent, questions of our time. As Peter Singer, among others, has pointed out, almost 10 million children die each year due to poverty, some of whom would not die if the amount of aid that we now offer increases significantly. As Singer has also pointed out, the exploitation of human beings and other animals is a major ethical and practical concern. There can be little reasonable doubt that pain and suffering abound, in the world today, due to many causes such as poverty, disease, environmental degradation and destruction and anthropocentrism among others, just as there can be little reasonable doubt that some of the pain and suffering is preventable.So, what does it mean to live ethically today? Does it mean taking the point of view of the universe, as Sidgwick put it, memorably, rather than a narrow anthropocentric or speciesist view? Does it mean living in accordance with duties or obligations, or in light of recognised virtues, or with the minimisation of pain and suffering primarily in mind? Does it entail a consideration of the interests of other species and a rejection of the principle of the sanctity of human life? Does it mean not eating animals when other healthy alternatives are available, especially when those animals have been treated in ways that are inconsistent with their interests, whatever they may be? Does it mean taking active steps to reduce poverty on our part on a day to day basis? Is ethics exhausted in some sense today?And if we could reach some consensus on these questions, what difference would the ethical life make? Some argue that speciesism and the exploitation of human beings and other animals might diminish; that pain and suffering, especially gratuitous pain and suffering, would decrease, or at the very least, not increase; or that we
In: European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 229-238
In: European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 157-176
In: Metascience: an international review journal for the history, philosophy and social studies of science, Band 6, Heft 1, S. 49-62
ISSN: 1467-9981
In: Asian studies review, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 163-214
ISSN: 1467-8403