Suchergebnisse

AbstractObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the longitudinal cross‐lagged association between family mutuality, depression, and anxiety among Chinese adolescents before and after the COVID‐19 lockdown in 2020.BackgroundLimited attention has been paid to the longitudinal links between family mutuality, depression, and anxiety in the context of the COVID‐19 pandemic.MethodWe used self‐administered questionnaires to collect data from three high schools and two middle schools in Chengdu City at two time points: Time 1 (T1), December 23, 2019–January 13, 2020; Time 2 (T2), June 16–July 8, 2020. The sample consisted of 7,958 participants who completed two wave surveys before and after the COVID‐19 lockdown. We analyzed the data using cross‐lagged structural equation modeling.ResultsThe longitudinal cross‐lagged model showed family mutuality at T1 significantly predicted depression, anxiety, and family mutuality at T2. We observed a decreasing prevalence of depression and anxiety after the COVID‐19 lockdown.ConclusionFamily mutuality plays an important role in mitigating long‐term mental health disorders, such as depression and anxiety. More family‐centered psychological interventions could be developed to alleviate mental health disorders during lockdowns.ImplicationsImproving family mutuality (e.g., mutual support, interaction, and caring among family members) could be beneficial for reducing mental health disorders among Chinese adolescents during the COVID‐19 pandemic.

Purpose: This study developed and validated a novel measure that captures the diverse positive experiences related to perceived informal support. We also examined its cross-sectional and longitudinal correlates in people with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Method: We analyzed data from an international clinical trial. Participants with PTSD symptoms completed assessments at baseline (N = 230) and after 1 month (N = 80). Results: The 34-item Perceived Informal Support Questionnaire (PISQ) had a two-factor structure, was internally consistent, and showed convergent validity with a general measure of social support. Additionally, baseline emotional support predicted fewer depressive symptoms (β = -.356, p = .015) and lower levels of impairments (β = -.271, p = .018) at 1-month follow-up. Discussion: This study offers a novel measure that captures the diverse experiences related to perceived informal support. It also highlights the importance of involving and supporting caregivers of individuals with mental health struggles, specifically PTSD symptoms.

Purpose: This study examined the cross-cultural validity of nonviolent communication (NVC) behaviors as measured using the Nonviolent Communication Behaviors Scale (NVCBS) and explored their potential relationship with post-traumatic stress (PTS). Methods: We analyzed data from two samples (N = 412 Chinese adults and N = 283 English-speaking adults). Results: The best-fitting model of NVCBS was the proposed three-factor model ("self-connection," "authentic self-expression," and "empathic listening"), with configural, metric, and scalar invariance established across samples with different languages and sociocultural backgrounds. The NVCBS had satisfactory internal consistency and convergent validity and was negatively associated with PTS. The findings were replicated across the two samples. Discussion: NVC behaviors can be reliably and validly measured using the NVCBS. Given its brevity and measurement invariance across cultures, the NVCBS is a promising tool to facilitate future studies on NVC. Moreover, a lack of NVC behaviors may be a social-behavioral feature associated with PTS.