Leslie F. Goldstein: The U.S. Supreme Court and Racial Minorities: Two Centuries of Judicial Review on Trial. (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2017. Pp. v, 461.)
In: The review of politics, Band 82, Heft 1, S. 192-194
ISSN: 1748-6858
28 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The review of politics, Band 82, Heft 1, S. 192-194
ISSN: 1748-6858
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
"Constitutionalism" published on by Oxford University Press.
In: Political science quarterly: a nonpartisan journal devoted to the study and analysis of government, politics and international affairs ; PSQ, Band 132, Heft 1, S. 182-184
ISSN: 1538-165X
In: Political science quarterly: a nonpartisan journal devoted to the study and analysis of government, politics and international affairs ; PSQ, Band 130, Heft 2, S. 390-392
ISSN: 1538-165X
In: Political science quarterly: PSQ ; the journal public and international affairs, Band 130, Heft 2, S. 390
ISSN: 0032-3195
In: Presidential studies quarterly: official publication of the Center for the Study of the Presidency, Band 42, Heft 4, S. 912-914
ISSN: 1741-5705
In: Studies in law, politics, and society, Band 58, S. 73-99
One of the most dramatic controversies over judicial independence in the United States occurred at the state level, in antebellum Kentucky, when two entirely different state high courts remained in operation, each claiming to be the only legitimate tribunal. This chapter describes Kentucky's two-court crisis, but focuses primarily on the constitutional convention of 1849, which followed it. Through the lens of modern scholarship about judicial independence, the lessons that antebellum Kentuckians drew from their own history seem quite counterintuitive. They did not view their project of judicial design as a matter of balancing judicial independence with accountability, a task that many modern scholars of American politics have posited as the central problem of judicial design. Instead, Kentucky's constitutional convention sought to structure an institution that would allow the state's courts to respond to popular sentiment without compromising their independence. Thus, these debates suggest frameworks for understanding judicial independence that do not pit independence against judicial accountability or popular politics, but attempt to discern which forms of politics threaten the independence of courts, and which forms may not. [Copyright Elsevier Ltd.]
In: Presidential studies quarterly, Band 42, Heft 4, S. 912-915
ISSN: 0360-4918
In: Special Issue: The Discourse of Judging; Studies in Law, Politics and Society, S. 73-99
In: APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: Polity, Band 43, Heft 3, S. 388-403
ISSN: 1744-1684
In: Polity: the journal of the Northeastern Political Science Association, Band 43, Heft 3, S. 388-403
ISSN: 0032-3497
In: Polity: the journal of the Northeastern Political Science Association, Band 43, Heft 3, S. 388-403
ISSN: 0032-3497
In: Polity: the journal of the Northeastern Political Science Association, Band 43, Heft 3, S. 388-403
ISSN: 0032-3497
In: Polity: the journal of the Northeastern Political Science Association, Band 43, Heft 3, S. 388-404
ISSN: 0032-3497