Land governance and tenure security at scale: Lessons from the field
In: Land use policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Band 110, S. 105451
ISSN: 0264-8377
38 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Land use policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Band 110, S. 105451
ISSN: 0264-8377
In: Land use policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Band 85, S. 21-32
ISSN: 0264-8377
The use of land consolidation on customary lands has been limited, though land fragmentation persists. Land fragmentation on customary lands has two main causes—the nature of the customary land tenure system, and the somewhat linked agricultural system. Since attempts to increase food productivity on customary lands have involved fertilisation and mechanisation on the small and scattered farmlands, these approaches have fallen short of increasing food productivity. A study to develop a responsible approach to land consolidation on customary lands using a design research approach is undertaken and reported here. Based on a comparative study, it is found that three factors inhibit the development of a responsible land consolidation approach on customary lands—the coverage of a land administration system, a land valuation approach, and a land reallocation approach the fits the customary land tenure system. To fill these gaps, firstly, this study developed the participatory land administration that brought together traditional land administration approaches with emerging bottom-up approaches, as well as technological advances that drive these approaches together with the growing societal needs. Secondly, a valuation approach was developed to enable the comparison of the farmlands in rural areas that are without land markets. Finally, a land reallocation approach was developed based on the political, economic and social, as well as technical and legal characteristics of rural customary farmlands. This study concludes that though the land consolidation strategy developed is significantly able to reduce land fragmentation, both physical and land tenure, the local customs are an obstruction to the technical processes to achieve the best form of farmland structures.
BASE
The use of land consolidation on customary lands has been limited, though land fragmentation persists. Land fragmentation on customary lands has two main causes—the nature of the customary land tenure system, and the somewhat linked agricultural system. Since attempts to increase food productivity on customary lands have involved fertilisation and mechanisation on the small and scattered farmlands, these approaches have fallen short of increasing food productivity. A study to develop a responsible approach to land consolidation on customary lands using a design research approach is undertaken and reported here. Based on a comparative study, it is found that three factors inhibit the development of a responsible land consolidation approach on customary lands—the coverage of a land administration system, a land valuation approach, and a land reallocation approach the fits the customary land tenure system. To fill these gaps, firstly, this study developed the participatory land administration that brought together traditional land administration approaches with emerging bottom-up approaches, as well as technological advances that drive these approaches together with the growing societal needs. Secondly, a valuation approach was developed to enable the comparison of the farmlands in rural areas that are without land markets. Finally, a land reallocation approach was developed based on the political, economic and social, as well as technical and legal characteristics of rural customary farmlands. This study concludes that though the land consolidation strategy developed is significantly able to reduce land fragmentation, both physical and land tenure, the local customs are an obstruction to the technical processes to achieve the best form of farmland structures.
BASE
In: Land use policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Band 78, S. 539-554
ISSN: 0264-8377
In: Habitat international: a journal for the study of human settlements, Band 117, S. 102437
In: Land use policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Band 104, S. 105352
ISSN: 0264-8377
In: Land use policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Band 99, S. 105081
ISSN: 0264-8377
In: Land use policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Band 81, S. 553-564
ISSN: 0264-8377
In: Survey review, S. 1-25
ISSN: 1752-2706
In: Land use policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Band 117, S. 106087
ISSN: 0264-8377
In: Land use policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Band 113, S. 105887
ISSN: 0264-8377
In: Land use policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Band 81, S. 21-38
ISSN: 0264-8377
In: Land use policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Band 42, S. 695-705
ISSN: 0264-8377
In: Land use policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Band 31, S. 595-604
ISSN: 0264-8377