Suchergebnisse

PurposeUnder the circumstance that the development of developing countries is a major issue that has long been of concern to Marxist scholars, the research is focused on the category of development benefit, which Xi Jinping has mentioned many times.Design/methodology/approachBased on the Marxist theory of international value, the authors of this paper indicate that development benefit is the result of developing countries' consistently increasing labor productivity, reducing squandering in labor and transforming more labor into real value, and thus the fundamental cause of unequal development in international economics turns from the field of circulation to the area of production.FindingsAlso, the authors summarize China's experience of obtaining the development benefit and China's development path featuring common development and criticized the comparative advantage of mainstream Western economics, revealed the path of dependency development represented by mainstream Western economics.Originality/valueFinally, the authors analyze the essence of the economy and trade conflict between China and the US and the respective strategic goals of the two countries and provide an outlook on the contest between the two roads of development and the evolutionary trend of the relationship between developed and developing countries.

Researchers have explored extensively into aspects of importance in the decision making process, however, the field of researches on building an integrative decision making model is uncultivated. To bridge the chasm, a systematic decision making model under crisis conditions is built in this paper by integrating factors into the classical decision making model. There are five main elements in the construction of the integrative decision making model, i.e., classical decision making model, decision making under crisis, psychological effects, risk and uncertainty and cross-cultural differences. By incorporating similar elements into integrative factors, three factors as key components in the decision making model, i.e., external environment, risk and idiosyncratic characteristics are listed. The model is expressed in two formats; the first being a simple mathematical formula while the second a flowchart that transforms the abstract thinking process into concrete phases, namely, status quo, identification, development and selection. The focus is centered more on the second method since it matches the reality better. From the analysis, the conclusion is derived that when the decision process is a stochastic dynamic Markov process, the final choice will approach a standard function of the factors in the current state with certain factors dominating the process in different circumstances as the times of making similar decisions increase. In terms of practicability, the model can properly explain the decision processes in the Asiana Airlines crash case and the Jiaduobao Trademark withdrawal case.