Interests driven or socially mobilized? Place attachment, social capital, and neighborhood participation in urban China
In: Journal of urban affairs, Band 44, Heft 8, S. 1136-1153
ISSN: 1467-9906
17 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of urban affairs, Band 44, Heft 8, S. 1136-1153
ISSN: 1467-9906
In: Habitat international: a journal for the study of human settlements, Band 46, S. 44-53
In: Territory, politics, governance, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 194-217
ISSN: 2162-268X
In: Habitat international: a journal for the study of human settlements, Band 135, S. 102812
In: British Accounting Review, Forthcoming
SSRN
In: Accounting & Finance, Band 57, Heft 1, S. 289-315
SSRN
In: Environment and behavior: eb ; publ. in coop. with the Environmental Design Research Association, Band 49, Heft 2, S. 161-191
ISSN: 1552-390X
Drawing on a citywide survey of 39 urban neighborhoods and a qualitative case study of a neighborhood in Guangzhou, China, this research addresses how communal space, social capital, and neighborhood attachment (NA) jointly shape neighborhood participation (NP). Communal space is strongly and significantly associated with NP. Furthermore, we find that communal space is related to NP in two ways: promoting place-based social relations (the social-capital mechanism) and nurturing place attachment (the intrapsychic mechanism). These findings point to the significance of communal space as a civic focal point in community building and place making.
SSRN
Working paper
In: Accounting & Finance, Band 59, Heft 4, S. 2273-2305
SSRN
In: Accounting & Finance, Band 59, Heft 4, S. 2377-2414
SSRN
Based on data from the 2005 National Population Sample Survey and compiled covariates of 205 prefectures, this research adopted principal-component and multilevel-logistic analyses to study homeownership in urban China. Although the housing reform has severed the link between work units and residence, working in state sectors (government, state-owned enterprises and collective firms) remained significant in determining a household's entitlement to reform-era housing with heavy subsidies or better qualities. While the prefecture-level index of marketization reduced local homeownership of self-built housing, affordable housing and privatized housing, its effect is moderated by cross-level interactions with income, education and working in state sectors across different types of housing. Meanwhile, the index of political and market connections promoted all types of homeownership except for self-built housing. By situating the downside of marketization within a context of urban transformation, this research not only challenges the teleological premise of the neoliberal market transition theory but calls for research on institutional dynamics and social consequences of urban transformation in China.
BASE
SSRN
In: China economic review, Band 62, S. 101479
ISSN: 1043-951X
In: Accounting & Finance, Band 57, Heft 1, S. 165-197
SSRN
In: Forthcoming in Journal of Corporate Finance, doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.06.002
SSRN