Suchergebnisse

The research was aimed at the analysis of conceptual works of the 20th century on aesthetic education as a component of personal culture and values of mankind in general, together with the examination of the results of the methodological system in art education; with special emphasis, on the influence of this educational and political system on the events in Ukraine in 2022. Also, the methodological systems, conceptual works and arrangements of art education of the XX and XXI centuries are discussed, and the modern vectors of art education development are analyzed. It is concluded that, at the level of development of Ukrainian education, there is an urgent need for balanced decisions regarding changes in modern education. In particular, it is urgent to rethink the cultural values of the Ukrainian people in their relation to the world culture in general, at a comprehensive methodological level, forming aesthetic values and national consciousness, understanding the value of cultural diversity. Changes in all spheres of life in the 21st century are a natural necessity for the development of society. Finally, the political preconditions that have been developing cannot be ignored.

The article summarises the advanced world experience in government regulation of the automotive industry using the example of the leading automotive manufacturing countries – China, Japan, India, South Korea, the USA, and the European Union. Leading approach to the study of this problem is the comparative method that has afforded revealing peculiarities of the primary measures applied by governments of the world to regulate the automotive industry have been identified. A unified model for government regulation of the automotive industry has been elaborated. The presented model contains a set of measures for government support for the automotive industry depending on the life cycle stage (inception, growth, stabilisation, top position, stagnation, decline, crisis) of the automotive industry and the level (high, medium, low) of competitiveness of automotive enterprises.

The article summarises the advanced world experience in government regulation of the automotive industry using the example of the leading automotive manufacturing countries – China, Japan, India, South Korea, the USA, and the European Union. Leading approach to the study of this problem is the comparative method that has afforded revealing peculiarities of the primary measures applied by governments of the world to regulate the automotive industry have been identified. A unified model for government regulation of the automotive industry has been elaborated. The presented model contains a set of measures for government support for the automotive industry depending on the life cycle stage (inception, growth, stabilisation, top position, stagnation, decline, crisis) of the automotive industry and the level (high, medium, low) of competitiveness of automotive enterprises.

The article summarises the advanced world experience in government regulation of the automotive industry using the example of the leading automotive manufacturing countries – China, Japan, India, South Korea, the USA, and the European Union. Leading approach to the study of this problem is the comparative method that has afforded revealing peculiarities of the primary measures applied by governments of the world to regulate the automotive industry have been identified. A unified model for government regulation of the automotive industry has been elaborated. The presented model contains a set of measures for government support for the automotive industry depending on the life cycle stage (inception, growth, stabilisation, top position, stagnation, decline, crisis) of the automotive industry and the level (high, medium, low) of competitiveness of automotive enterprises.