Suchergebnisse

Title page -- Introduction to the ISHTAR Project -- Contents -- Chapter 1: The ISHTAR White Paper -- Chapter 2: Security of Electronic Health Care Records: A Clinical Perspective -- Chapter 3: Implications of the EU Data Protection Directive and Council of Europe Recommendations for Healthcare Establishments -- Chapter 4: Legal Liability for Telemedicine and Healthcare Networking -- Chapter 5: Current Security Issues Faced by Health Care Establishments and Resulting Requirements for a Secure Health Information System Architecture -- Chapter 6: IT Security Training -- Chapter 7: The ISHTAR Security Guidelines -- Chapter 8: Developing a European Computer Security Incident Reporting Service for Health Care -- Chapter 9: The ISHTAR World Wide Web Dissemination and Advisory Service for Healthcare Information Security -- Chapter 10: Verification of ISHTAR Activities -- Chapter 11: Security Consultancy to and Implementation in Healthcare Telematics Projects -- Chapter 12: Conclusion -- Annex: Complete Summary of Recommendations Regarding Legal Liability -- Author Index

Title Page -- Contents -- Introduction to the SEISMED Guidelines -- Getting Started With The SEISMED Guidelines -- Guideline Index Table -- Health Informatics Deontology Code -- Guidelines on IT Security Risk Analysis For Health Care Management -- High Level Security Policy Guidelines -- Baseline Security Guidelines for Health Care Management -- Security of Medical Database Systems for Health Care Management -- Network Security Guidelines for Health Care Management -- Guidelines for Secure Systems Procurement, Development and Design for Health Care Management -- Guidelines for Secure System Implementation for Health Care Management -- Annex: Guideline for Cryptographic Mechanisms for Health Care Management -- BIBLIOGRAPHY -- Glossary -- The SEISMED Consortium -- Author Index

Title Page -- Contents -- Introduction to the SEISMED Guidelines -- Getting Started With The 5EISMED Guidelines -- Guideline Index Table -- Health Informatics Deontology Code -- Guidelines on IT Security Risk Analysis for Health Care IT and Security Personnel -- High Level Security Policy Guidelines -- Baseline Security Guidelines for Health Care IT and Security Personnel -- Security of Medical Database Systems For Health Care IT And Security Personnel -- Network Security Guidelines for Health Care IT and Security Personnel -- Guidelines for Secure Systems Procurement, Development and Design for Health Care IT and Security Personnel -- Guidelines for Secure System Implementation for Health Care IT and Security Personnel -- Annex: Technical Recommendations on Cryptographic Mechanisms for IT and Security Personnel -- BIBLIOGRAPHY -- Glossary -- The SEISMED Consortium

Title Page -- Contents -- Introduction to the SEISMED Guidelines -- Getting Started With The SEISMED Guidelines -- Guideline Index Table -- Health Informatics Deontology Code -- Guidelines On IT Security Risk Analysis For Health Care System Users -- High Level Security Policy Guidelines -- Baseline Security Guidelines for Health Care System Users -- Security Of Medical Database Systems for Health Care System Users -- Network Security Guidelines for Health Care System Users -- Annex: Guideline for Cryptographic Mechanisms for Health Care System Users -- BIBLIOGRAPHY -- Glossary -- The SEISMED Consortium -- Author Index

This article critically reviews the literature on urban informality, inequity, health, well-being and accountability to identify key conceptual, methodological and empirical gaps in academic and policy discourses. We argue that critical attention to power dynamics is often a key missing element in these discourses and make the case for explicit attention to the operation of power throughout conceptualization, design and conduct of research in this space. We argue that: (a) urban informality reflects the exercise of power to confer and withhold advantage; (b) the dominant biomedical model of health poorly links embodied experiences and structural contexts; (c) existing models of accountability are inadequate in unequal, pluralistic governance and provision environments. We trace four conceptual and empirical directions for transformative approaches to power relations in urban health equity research.