Suchergebnisse

This research shed lights on the strategic impact of the regulatory factors on the administrative decision in the period from 2006 to 2016 - an applied study on Jordan Phosphate Company. The study focused mainly on observations and questionnaire. The questionnaire included personal data and statements dealing with organizational factors and administrative decision. The most important results are: The regulations and instructions helped to develop the administrative decision of Jordan Phosphate Company, and the process of administrative authorization within the Jordan Phosphate Company helped to achieve efficiency and good performance. In the light of the results, a number of recommendations were made, including: the need to take into account the internal and external factors so as not to adversely affect the process of administrative decision-making, the use of experts in the field of administrative decision-making to solve problems in the Jordanian Phosphate Company and raise the efficiency of performance, besides the attention to remove the obstacles that limit the participation of employees in Jordan Phosphate in administrative decision-making.

The cause of disagreement -- Disagreement over the rulings of the religion -- Against disagreement over the rulings of the religion -- The method of the adherents of the truth when the correct ruling on an issue is not known -- Against arbitrary submission to authority -- The difference between submission to illegitimate authorities and referral to the legitimate authorities -- Against consensus -- Against speculative -- Against analogy -- Against preference -- Against inference -- Against legal interpretation and personal judgment

تتولّى الإدارةُ العامَّةُ إدارةَ شؤونِ الدولةِ وتسييرَ أُمورِها بما لها مِنْ سُلُطاتٍ وامتيازاتٍ منحها إيّاها المُشرِّعُ تحقيقًا للمصلحةِ العامَّةِ، وإنَّ أخطرَ هذهِ الامتيازاتُ هو حقّها في إصدارِ قراراتٍ مُلزِمةٍ بإرادتها المنفردة ومن ثم يجد الأفراد أنفسهم في مواجهةِ قرارٍ مُلزَمين بتنفيذهِ من دون أنْ يكون لهم الحقَّ في رفضهِ أو إبداء رأيهم فيه، وينبغي ظهور هذه الإرادة الباطنة بمظهرٍ خارجيٍّ حتى يعلم بها الأفراد المعنيون بتنفيذها وهو ما يُطلَق الظهور عليه"شكل القرار الإداري" لذا يُعَدُّ ضمانةً للأفرادِ لأنَّه يُحيطهُم عِلمًا بما تُقرِّره الإدارة تجاههم. ويُعَدُّ عيبَ الشكلِ في القرارِ الإداريِّ من أسبابِ الطعنِ فيه بالإلغاءِ؛ لأنَّه ينصَبُّ على رُكنٍ أساسيٍّ من أركانِ القرارِ الإداريِّ لا يستقيم من دونه، فالإدارةُ مُلزَمةٌ بأنْ تُفرِغَ إرادتَها بالشكل الذي يُحدِّده القانون وللقضاء الإداري سلطةَ إلغاءِ القرارِ المعيبِ بعيبِ الشكلِ. وتَبرزُ أهمّية ركن الشكل في خصوصيَّته؛ لأنَّه يُنظِّمُ ويضبطُ عملَ الإدارةِ في صورةٍ محدَّدةٍ دقيقةٍ وقانونيَّةٍ ممَّا يَستتبِعهُ ضمانُ مشروعيَّةِ القرارِ الذي تُصدِره الإدارة، فالتزام الإدارة به يُؤدِّي إلى تحقيق المصلحة العامَّة؛ لأنَّه يُظهِر إرادة الإدارة في صور ومظاهر خارجيةٍ معلومةٍ للأفرادِ بِغيةَ الالتزامَ بها وتنفيذها. ; The Public Administration Assumes The Management of The Affairs of The State And The Conduct of Its Affairs With The Powers And Privileges Granted To It By The Legislator In order To Achieve The Public Interest، And The Most Dangerous of These Privileges Is Its Right To Issue Decisions That Are Binding on Their Individual Will، And Therefore Individuals Find Themselves With A Refusal To Confront Them Without Facing Their opinion on It، And Since This Inner Will of The Administration Should Appear In An External Appearance Until The Individuals Concerned With Its Implementation Know About It And This Appearance Is What Is Called The "Administrative Decision Form" So It Is Considered A Guarantee For Individuals Because Debriefed Note Determined By The Administration Towards Them. The Importance of The Corner of The Form Emerges In Its Privacy Because It ...