Suchergebnisse

The article is devoted to the characteristics of the object of related rights of a broadcasting organization. The subject matter of the study is the legal regulation of this object in the Laws of Ukraine "On Television and Radio Broadcasting", "On Copyright and Related Rights" of 1993, and the Civil Code of Ukraine whose provisions contained conflicts for a long time, and the Law of Ukraine "On Copyright and Related Rights" of 2022. The purpose of the article is to provide a comprehensive characterization of the broadcasting organization program as an object of related rights and to determine its relationship with the separate show of the broadcasting organization. The study was conducted using historical, comparative legal, formal legal, dialectical and logical methods. It is substantiated that a separate show, in case of a creative contribution to its creation, is an oral work (radio show) or an audiovisual work (television show) capable of copyright protection. Related rights of broadcasting organizations extend to a set of shows and other materials combined in the program but not to individual components of this program. This approach is also reflected in the provisions of the new Law of Ukraine "On Copyright and Related Rights" of 2022. It is determined that the program of broadcasting organization is not identical to a composite work since its legal protection covers the result of not creative selection and arrangement of certain materials but organizational and technical efforts to compose certain objects into a complete program.

This article examines the impact of recent changes in the management and organization of British broadcasting on gender. It follows two key lines of inquiry. The first explores the structural relations between men and women and argues that changes in the terms and conditions of work in the major broadcasting corporations have fallen disproportionately heavily on women. The second explores the discursive and cultural processes that work within broadcasting organizations to construct a range of gendered occupational identities. Although these still remain constrained for women, the new organizational arrangements have opened up spaces wherein women may challenge the traditional ways in which they have been represented and may construct alternative, more challenging, identities.

Examines changes in management and organization; argues that impact has fallen disproportionately on women and explores construction on gendered occupational identities.

"The Global News Challenge tackles one of the timeliest topics in mass communication today--the challenges facing international broadcasters with universal branding strategies in developing countries. In these heavily government-controlled media environments with a scarcity of reliable information, international news providers traditionally had an influential position. With the ongoing media liberalization, however, commercial domestic providers have gained in strength to become strong competitors. Additionally, in a number of countries, pan-Arab broadcasting enterprises have widened their reach, contributing to the growing competition for traditional international providers such as the BBC or France 24. This book employs a global perspective to explore the subject across the whole population and different media platforms in select developing markets of Africa and South Asia. It is unique in providing a theoretical framework by which to analyze demand and usage of and trust in news from international broadcasters across the whole population, not just opinion leaders. It outlines the strategic options for international broadcasters in these evolving market contexts. "--

This study is an attempt to understand 'fake news' from the unique perspective of public broadcasting organizations in the Asia-Pacific region; the focus is on how – and how well – they have adapted to the growing incidence of various forms of disinformation, and how they see their role in educating diverse audiences about the phenomenon. This research provides public broadcasting organizations and (news) media practitioners with up-to-date, evidence-based insights on how to combat 'fake news' and disinformation effectively. In collaboration with the Asia-Pacific Institute for Broadcasting Development, a census survey was conducted among their members, resulting in 57 completed questionnaires, representing 24 public broadcasting organizations in eighteen countries. A major finding is that public broadcasting organizations have to get used to revisiting, revising and refining what it is they do (practices), how it is being done (systems, operating procedures, technologies, financial resources) and by whom (human but also IT resources). The analysis also points up the need for collaboration so that scarce resources can be utilized more efficiently.

The socially useful effect of broadcasts by broadcasting organizations aimed at distributing creative objects and information to representatives of the public is rewarded by the recognition of exclusive rights to the results of their intellectual activity by these organizations. Although illegal rebroadcasting of radio and television broadcasts on the air or by cable are not excluded, most violations of the exclusive rights of broadcasting organizations are currently committed in information and telecommunications networks, including the Internet. The purpose of this article is to identify problematic aspects in the protection of the rights of broadcasting organizations in court. The article analyzes the Russian legislation concerning the activities of broadcasting organizations, as well as judicial practice in cases of violation of the exclusive rights of broadcasting organizations. In case of violations of the exclusive rights of broadcasting organizations on the Internet, broadcasting organizations use, among other things, protective mechanisms provided for by the legislation on information, information technologies and information protection, and may also apply to the Moscow City Court for the application of preliminary interim measures of copyright and related rights protection against illegally used objects. However, broadcasting on the Internet around the world remains a gray area from the point of view of law, and legal relations with the participation of broadcasting organizations require additional legal regulation. There is no unambiguous answer in Russian legislation to the question whether the rebroadcasting on the Internet can be considered as making to the public, or such rebroadcasting should be considered as an independent way of using broadcasting that is not reflected in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. ; Общественно полезный эффект от трансляций организаций вещания, направленных на распространение творческих объектов и информации представителям публики, вознаграждается признанием за данными организациями исключительных прав на результаты их интеллектуальной деятельности. Хотя не исключены инеправомерные ретрансляции радио- ителепередач вэфир или по кабелю, большинство нарушений исключительных прав организаций вещания внастоящее время совершается в информационно-телекоммуникационных сетях, включая интернет. Цель настоящей статьи— выявление проблемных аспектов при защите прав организаций вещания всудебном порядке. В статье анализируются российское законодательство, касающееся деятельности организаций вещания, атакже судебная практика по делам о нарушении исключительных прав организаций вещания. Вслучае нарушений исключительных прав организаций вещания винтернете организации вещания пользуются втом числе защитными механизмами, предусмотренными законодательством об информации, информационных технологиях и о защите информации, атакже могут обратиться вМосковских городской суд за применением вотношении неправомерно используемых объектов предварительных обеспечительных мер защиты авторского права и смежных прав. Однако вещание винтернете во всем мире остается сточки зрения права серой зоной, аправоотношения сучастием организаций вещания требуют дополнительного правового регулирования. Вроссийском законодательстве отсутствует однозначный ответ на вопрос, может ли ретрансляция сообщения передач винтернете рассматриваться как доведение до всеобщего сведения или такую ретрансляцию следует рассматривать как самостоятельный способ использования сообщений, не нашедший отражение вГражданском кодексе Российской Федерации.