Factors Mediating the Adjustment to Involuntary Childlessness
In: Family relations, Band 37, Heft 3, S. 338
ISSN: 1741-3729
496 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Family relations, Band 37, Heft 3, S. 338
ISSN: 1741-3729
In: Economic Development and Cultural Change, Band 33, Heft 3, S. 503-519
ISSN: 1539-2988
In: The family coordinator, Band 27, Heft 2, S. 179
In: Journal of biosocial science: JBS, Band 15, Heft 4, S. 441-452
ISSN: 1469-7599
SummaryThis paper examines rates of marital childlessness in the developing countries of the world and separates them into voluntary, involuntary and related components through a decision-tree model based on fecundity, contraceptive behaviour, pregnancy status, age, years married, and other variables. The principal data are taken from World Fertility Surveys. The conclusion is reached that virtually all of the permanent childlessness in the developing countries examined is involuntary.
In: Journal of family history: studies in family, kinship and demography, Band 34, Heft 2, S. 206-223
ISSN: 1552-5473
We perform a content analysis of twenty marriage and family textbooks published between 1950 and 2000 to study how the voluntarily childless are presented in undergraduate courses. Throughout the time period studied, independence, pursuit of a career, and romance were prominent themes in the representation of voluntary childlessness. Other themes emerged specific to each decade—the 1950s portrayed parenthood as a challenge, while the 1990s concentrated on alleviating negative stereotypes of the voluntarily childless.
In: Vienna yearbook of population research, Band 8, S. 51-75
ISSN: 1728-5305
In: Balkanite: ezik, istorija, kultura, Band 6, Heft 1
ISSN: 2535-1346
In: International journal of Japanese sociology, Band 17, Heft 1, S. 42-62
ISSN: 1475-6781
Abstract: This paper focuses on childlessness in Germany and Japan and its sociological meanings in family formation in postmodern societies. First, it shows the trends of fertility decline and increasing childlessness, and clarifies the similarities and differences in both countries, by comparing parity composition, educational attainment, and other socioeconomic correlates of childlessness. Second, using the data of attitudinal surveys, such as the 2003 Population Policy Acceptance Study (PPAS) in Germany and the 13th National Fertility Survey (JNFS; 2005) in Japan, the reasons for having no children are observed. Third, referring to the discussions of German scholars, it tries to explain the sociological meanings of childlessness and to describe the development toward a childless society (even if it's demographically not sustainable) as one of the possible consequences of the Second Demographic Transition. Important findings are as follows: (1) In Germany the fertility decline began early in the mid‐1960s but in Japan later from mid‐1970s so that the increase of childlessness has been a little delayed. The proportion of childless women in Western Germany increased to 28% for the 1967 cohort. In Japan, it has increased to 12.7% for the 1960 cohort, but is expected to reach 30% for the 1970 cohort. (2) The educational gap in childlessness is clearly observed in Germany; however, this is not so simple in Japan. Corresponding with the increase of childlessness, the desired number of children in average is declining. The emergence of a child‐free culture is observed in Germany by PPAS, but not yet in Japan by JNFS. (3) Polarization may proceed further in both countries, between childless people and people with many children.
In: Women's studies quarterly: WSQ, Band 37, Heft 2, S. 157-172
ISSN: 1934-1520
In: Marriage & family review, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 1-26
ISSN: 1540-9635
In: Sociological spectrum: the official Journal of the Mid-South Sociological Association, Band 9, Heft 4, S. 425-438
ISSN: 1521-0707
In: Families in society: the journal of contemporary human services, Band 70, Heft 1, S. 43-50
ISSN: 1945-1350
In: The family coordinator, Band 22, Heft 2, S. 199
In: International journal of forecasting, Band 8, Heft 3, S. 477-493
ISSN: 0169-2070
In: Journal of biosocial science: JBS, Band 4, Heft 4, S. 443-454
ISSN: 1469-7599
The common belief that childlessness is positively associated with instability of marriage derives from official statistics which appear to show higher divorce rates for childless than for fertile couples. The official findings are a procedural artifact, however, and the relationship shown is certainly exaggerated and possibly spurious.The appropriate strategy in determining whether divorcees are relatively infertile is to find a population with disrupted marriages and measure its fertility experience. In doing so it is necessary to take note of the definition of fertility, the remarriage factor, and (most importantly) the duration of marriage. The official statistics use the conception of legal duration of marriage. Since this ignores separation before divorce, its use exaggerates the infertility of divorcees, as does failure to exclude remarriages. De facto duration of marriage (wedding to separation) is a superior statement of opportunity to conceive, and calculations on this basis eliminate or even reverse the fertility differential between divorcing and stable couples. Local figures are used to illustrate this effect, and the finding is supported by evidence from a sample of marriages ending in legal proceedings lesser than divorce. It is concluded that the alleged relationship between childlessness and instability of marriage is probably either non-existent or the reverse of that normally assumed, and that in any case measurement of the net overall effect of childlessness does not provide a helpful datum. An alternative strategy of research is suggested, which would seek patterns of effect rather than net overall effect, taking heed of relevant variables, and also considering all forms of marital breakdown including marriages in which cohabitation continues only with disharmony.