Suchergebnisse

In the paper the issues of nature and keynote attributes of share, ordinary shares, different types of preference shares, the use and value of voting rights, and types of shares in regard of voting rights attributed to it are discussed. Given that the 'one share – one vote' principle is of fundamental importance in the context of company law, part of this paper is devoted to analysing its rationale and possible legitimacy. The overview of ordinary shares serves in unravelling its nature and the process of comparing ordinary shares with preference shares defines their inherent differences. Different ways in which granting of voting rights can be structured enable the entities concerned to respond to the market forces, however it can also result in negative outcomes to the parties involved in business transactions. Complex share capital structures may in assist the dominant shareholders in exploiting the non-controlling shareholders and empowering them to extract benefits at the expense of the latter. With a view to avoiding such negative outcomes, proper regulation rightly balancing the interests of parties involved should be enforced. In examining voting rights enjoyed by the shareholders, the principle of 'one share – one vote' deserves adequate scrutiny. The opinions as to the necessity of adherence to the proportionality principle are divergent. Although most favour implementation of the principle, strict observance of 'one share – one vote' is not always desirable. The significance of 'one share – one vote' principle can best be witnessed in the context of takeovers. The legal rules and implementation of the principle is related to certain decisions of political and economical nature, for it does not solely depend on the need to protect the interests of the weaker party, but also have to measure its possible effects on competitiveness and structure of the market. In the European Union the principle of 'one share – one vote' is provided for in the Takeover Directive in a form of an optional breakthrough rule. Since the common approach to essential company law rules on the European level has not been reached, the present-day breakthrough rule is not able to attain the objectives initially sought by the harmonization. As the mainstream authors point out, the effect of the breakrought rule is likely to be insignificant.

In the paper the issues of nature and keynote attributes of share, ordinary shares, different types of preference shares, the use and value of voting rights, and types of shares in regard of voting rights attributed to it are discussed. Given that the 'one share – one vote' principle is of fundamental importance in the context of company law, part of this paper is devoted to analysing its rationale and possible legitimacy. The overview of ordinary shares serves in unravelling its nature and the process of comparing ordinary shares with preference shares defines their inherent differences. Different ways in which granting of voting rights can be structured enable the entities concerned to respond to the market forces, however it can also result in negative outcomes to the parties involved in business transactions. Complex share capital structures may in assist the dominant shareholders in exploiting the non-controlling shareholders and empowering them to extract benefits at the expense of the latter. With a view to avoiding such negative outcomes, proper regulation rightly balancing the interests of parties involved should be enforced. In examining voting rights enjoyed by the shareholders, the principle of 'one share – one vote' deserves adequate scrutiny. The opinions as to the necessity of adherence to the proportionality principle are divergent. Although most favour implementation of the principle, strict observance of 'one share – one vote' is not always desirable. The significance of 'one share – one vote' principle can best be witnessed in the context of takeovers. The legal rules and implementation of the principle is related to certain decisions of political and economical nature, for it does not solely depend on the need to protect the interests of the weaker party, but also have to measure its possible effects on competitiveness and structure of the market. In the European Union the principle of 'one share – one vote' is provided for in the Takeover Directive in a form of an optional breakthrough rule. Since the common approach to essential company law rules on the European level has not been reached, the present-day breakthrough rule is not able to attain the objectives initially sought by the harmonization. As the mainstream authors point out, the effect of the breakrought rule is likely to be insignificant.

This article analyses social inequality and political processes in post-Communist Lithuania, using the neo-Weberian class theory of Robert Erikson, John Goldthorpe and Lucienne Portocarero (EGP). The opening section considers why the analysis of social structure, which was a central concern in classical sociology, has been so neglected in Lithuanian sociology since the restoration of independence. There are just two exceptions to this trend, discussed in the same section - Rūta Brazienė's 2002 thesis and the 2005 volume edited by Arvydas Matulionis. The first part also compares inductive (data-driven) and deductive (theory-driven) methodologies of social structure analysis to substantiate the advantages of the latter for this article's empirical analysis. The second part outlines EGP class theory, considered as a creative continuation of Weber's classical analysis of social structure, and as a genuine alternative to Marx's theory of classes and class struggle. EGP class theory is compared with two other approaches - Erik Olin Wright's neo-Marxist class theory, which emphasises exploitation relations between classes, and American social stratification analysis, which focuses on the measurement of socio-economic status (SES). The third section offers a neo-Weberian examination of post-Communist Lithuania's class structure, represented by four different EGP class types. Diachronic and synchronic comparisons and historical analysis are used to point out the features of Lithuanian class structure that are shared with other similar countries and those features that are nationally specific. To this end, data from Round 4 of the European Social Survey in Lithuania (conducted at the end of 2009) is used. In the last section, which applies statistical methods of correspondence analysis, a slightly modified EGP class model is used to explore manifestations of social inequality [.]

This article analyses social inequality and political processes in post-Communist Lithuania, using the neo-Weberian class theory of Robert Erikson, John Goldthorpe and Lucienne Portocarero (EGP). The opening section considers why the analysis of social structure, which was a central concern in classical sociology, has been so neglected in Lithuanian sociology since the restoration of independence. There are just two exceptions to this trend, discussed in the same section - Rūta Brazienė's 2002 thesis and the 2005 volume edited by Arvydas Matulionis. The first part also compares inductive (data-driven) and deductive (theory-driven) methodologies of social structure analysis to substantiate the advantages of the latter for this article's empirical analysis. The second part outlines EGP class theory, considered as a creative continuation of Weber's classical analysis of social structure, and as a genuine alternative to Marx's theory of classes and class struggle. EGP class theory is compared with two other approaches - Erik Olin Wright's neo-Marxist class theory, which emphasises exploitation relations between classes, and American social stratification analysis, which focuses on the measurement of socio-economic status (SES). The third section offers a neo-Weberian examination of post-Communist Lithuania's class structure, represented by four different EGP class types. Diachronic and synchronic comparisons and historical analysis are used to point out the features of Lithuanian class structure that are shared with other similar countries and those features that are nationally specific. To this end, data from Round 4 of the European Social Survey in Lithuania (conducted at the end of 2009) is used. In the last section, which applies statistical methods of correspondence analysis, a slightly modified EGP class model is used to explore manifestations of social inequality [.]

This article analyses social inequality and political processes in post-Communist Lithuania, using the neo-Weberian class theory of Robert Erikson, John Goldthorpe and Lucienne Portocarero (EGP). The opening section considers why the analysis of social structure, which was a central concern in classical sociology, has been so neglected in Lithuanian sociology since the restoration of independence. There are just two exceptions to this trend, discussed in the same section - Rūta Brazienė's 2002 thesis and the 2005 volume edited by Arvydas Matulionis. The first part also compares inductive (data-driven) and deductive (theory-driven) methodologies of social structure analysis to substantiate the advantages of the latter for this article's empirical analysis. The second part outlines EGP class theory, considered as a creative continuation of Weber's classical analysis of social structure, and as a genuine alternative to Marx's theory of classes and class struggle. EGP class theory is compared with two other approaches - Erik Olin Wright's neo-Marxist class theory, which emphasises exploitation relations between classes, and American social stratification analysis, which focuses on the measurement of socio-economic status (SES). The third section offers a neo-Weberian examination of post-Communist Lithuania's class structure, represented by four different EGP class types. Diachronic and synchronic comparisons and historical analysis are used to point out the features of Lithuanian class structure that are shared with other similar countries and those features that are nationally specific. To this end, data from Round 4 of the European Social Survey in Lithuania (conducted at the end of 2009) is used. In the last section, which applies statistical methods of correspondence analysis, a slightly modified EGP class model is used to explore manifestations of social inequality [.]

This article analyses social inequality and political processes in post-Communist Lithuania, using the neo-Weberian class theory of Robert Erikson, John Goldthorpe and Lucienne Portocarero (EGP). The opening section considers why the analysis of social structure, which was a central concern in classical sociology, has been so neglected in Lithuanian sociology since the restoration of independence. There are just two exceptions to this trend, discussed in the same section - Rūta Brazienė's 2002 thesis and the 2005 volume edited by Arvydas Matulionis. The first part also compares inductive (data-driven) and deductive (theory-driven) methodologies of social structure analysis to substantiate the advantages of the latter for this article's empirical analysis. The second part outlines EGP class theory, considered as a creative continuation of Weber's classical analysis of social structure, and as a genuine alternative to Marx's theory of classes and class struggle. EGP class theory is compared with two other approaches - Erik Olin Wright's neo-Marxist class theory, which emphasises exploitation relations between classes, and American social stratification analysis, which focuses on the measurement of socio-economic status (SES). The third section offers a neo-Weberian examination of post-Communist Lithuania's class structure, represented by four different EGP class types. Diachronic and synchronic comparisons and historical analysis are used to point out the features of Lithuanian class structure that are shared with other similar countries and those features that are nationally specific. To this end, data from Round 4 of the European Social Survey in Lithuania (conducted at the end of 2009) is used. In the last section, which applies statistical methods of correspondence analysis, a slightly modified EGP class model is used to explore manifestations of social inequality [.]

This article analyses social inequality and political processes in post-Communist Lithuania, using the neo-Weberian class theory of Robert Erikson, John Goldthorpe and Lucienne Portocarero (EGP). The opening section considers why the analysis of social structure, which was a central concern in classical sociology, has been so neglected in Lithuanian sociology since the restoration of independence. There are just two exceptions to this trend, discussed in the same section - Rūta Brazienė's 2002 thesis and the 2005 volume edited by Arvydas Matulionis. The first part also compares inductive (data-driven) and deductive (theory-driven) methodologies of social structure analysis to substantiate the advantages of the latter for this article's empirical analysis. The second part outlines EGP class theory, considered as a creative continuation of Weber's classical analysis of social structure, and as a genuine alternative to Marx's theory of classes and class struggle. EGP class theory is compared with two other approaches - Erik Olin Wright's neo-Marxist class theory, which emphasises exploitation relations between classes, and American social stratification analysis, which focuses on the measurement of socio-economic status (SES). The third section offers a neo-Weberian examination of post-Communist Lithuania's class structure, represented by four different EGP class types. Diachronic and synchronic comparisons and historical analysis are used to point out the features of Lithuanian class structure that are shared with other similar countries and those features that are nationally specific. To this end, data from Round 4 of the European Social Survey in Lithuania (conducted at the end of 2009) is used. In the last section, which applies statistical methods of correspondence analysis, a slightly modified EGP class model is used to explore manifestations of social inequality [.]

This article analyses social inequality and political processes in post-Communist Lithuania, using the neo-Weberian class theory of Robert Erikson, John Goldthorpe and Lucienne Portocarero (EGP). The opening section considers why the analysis of social structure, which was a central concern in classical sociology, has been so neglected in Lithuanian sociology since the restoration of independence. There are just two exceptions to this trend, discussed in the same section - Rūta Brazienė's 2002 thesis and the 2005 volume edited by Arvydas Matulionis. The first part also compares inductive (data-driven) and deductive (theory-driven) methodologies of social structure analysis to substantiate the advantages of the latter for this article's empirical analysis. The second part outlines EGP class theory, considered as a creative continuation of Weber's classical analysis of social structure, and as a genuine alternative to Marx's theory of classes and class struggle. EGP class theory is compared with two other approaches - Erik Olin Wright's neo-Marxist class theory, which emphasises exploitation relations between classes, and American social stratification analysis, which focuses on the measurement of socio-economic status (SES). The third section offers a neo-Weberian examination of post-Communist Lithuania's class structure, represented by four different EGP class types. Diachronic and synchronic comparisons and historical analysis are used to point out the features of Lithuanian class structure that are shared with other similar countries and those features that are nationally specific. To this end, data from Round 4 of the European Social Survey in Lithuania (conducted at the end of 2009) is used. In the last section, which applies statistical methods of correspondence analysis, a slightly modified EGP class model is used to explore manifestations of social inequality [.]

Master's final paper is devoted to research an institute of class action, aiming to explore the possibilities of class action regulation in Lithuania. The main goal of this Final paper is to present the options of class action regulation in the civil procedure to a legislator of Republic of Lithuania. The author of the Final paper analyses different models of class action in the first part of Final paper. The research is based on different jurisdictions, such as the USA (traditional class action), Sweden, Finland and Norway (law systems close to the Republic of Lithuania and these systems have class action regulation). Also, the research contains initiatives of the regulation of collective actions in the institutions of the European Union. The author leads to the findings that class action regulation in different countries differs a lot. Anyway, it is possible to formulate a class action definition according to goal of class action (defend the rights of the members of a group), individual right to claim, res judicata of a judgment, and efficiency, expediency and eligibility of a group claim. The author of the Final paper analyses and qualifies the initiatives of class action regulation in the Republic of Lithuania. The authors leads to the findings that the legislator's initiative of the year 2006 is not adaptive to Lithuanian civil procedure. That is why because The law draft of 2006 retains an overwhelming connection between group action and public interest. Also, to the procedures of class action The law draft of 2006 proposed to use process abetting and there is no consolidated possibility to claim for damages. However, the legislator's initiative of the year 2012 is valued in a very positive way. That is why because The law draft of 2012 is based on the opt-in system, it provides a clear definition of a group, the claims for damages are possible and res judicata of a judgment is based on all the members of the group. In the third part of Final paper the author proposes to adopt the institute of a class action in Lithuanian civil procedure, accepting The law draft of 2012. However, the author proposes several improvements to The law draft of 2012, which are to make a non-judicial proceeding more attractive and clear, to improve a process of appeal and the role of the group leader. In addition, there is a need to identify the arias there class action is needed most and make sure that all the weak groups of a society will have a chance to claim. In addition, there is a need to adopt safeguards to The law draft of 2012. The attachments number one and number two present the preliminary law draft of the proposal of class action regulation in the civil procedure of the Republic of Lithuania. In the end of the Final paper the author leads to a conclusion that class action is an appropriate implement to protect the rights of the classes and to get a redress in the civil procedure of the Republic of Lithuania.

Master's final paper is devoted to research an institute of class action, aiming to explore the possibilities of class action regulation in Lithuania. The main goal of this Final paper is to present the options of class action regulation in the civil procedure to a legislator of Republic of Lithuania. The author of the Final paper analyses different models of class action in the first part of Final paper. The research is based on different jurisdictions, such as the USA (traditional class action), Sweden, Finland and Norway (law systems close to the Republic of Lithuania and these systems have class action regulation). Also, the research contains initiatives of the regulation of collective actions in the institutions of the European Union. The author leads to the findings that class action regulation in different countries differs a lot. Anyway, it is possible to formulate a class action definition according to goal of class action (defend the rights of the members of a group), individual right to claim, res judicata of a judgment, and efficiency, expediency and eligibility of a group claim. The author of the Final paper analyses and qualifies the initiatives of class action regulation in the Republic of Lithuania. The authors leads to the findings that the legislator's initiative of the year 2006 is not adaptive to Lithuanian civil procedure. That is why because The law draft of 2006 retains an overwhelming connection between group action and public interest. Also, to the procedures of class action The law draft of 2006 proposed to use process abetting and there is no consolidated possibility to claim for damages. However, the legislator's initiative of the year 2012 is valued in a very positive way. That is why because The law draft of 2012 is based on the opt-in system, it provides a clear definition of a group, the claims for damages are possible and res judicata of a judgment is based on all the members of the group. In the third part of Final paper the author proposes to adopt the institute of a class action in Lithuanian civil procedure, accepting The law draft of 2012. However, the author proposes several improvements to The law draft of 2012, which are to make a non-judicial proceeding more attractive and clear, to improve a process of appeal and the role of the group leader. In addition, there is a need to identify the arias there class action is needed most and make sure that all the weak groups of a society will have a chance to claim. In addition, there is a need to adopt safeguards to The law draft of 2012. The attachments number one and number two present the preliminary law draft of the proposal of class action regulation in the civil procedure of the Republic of Lithuania. In the end of the Final paper the author leads to a conclusion that class action is an appropriate implement to protect the rights of the classes and to get a redress in the civil procedure of the Republic of Lithuania.

For two decades, Lithuania is on the way a democratic state, in keeping with the global information space, involvement in the processes of globalization. It promises greater economic, political, socio-cultural and even moral norms and rules, unification, the transition to a new, comprehensive system of values. Professor J. Vaitkevicius (1995) claimed that Lithuanian revival is directly linked to the school and the teacher's renaissance. Values change pasulyje play a major role in the cycle of art subjects, including dance. Pupils' willingness to learn dance strongly influenced by the personality of the teacher - learner psychological characteristics, the subject of dance knowledge and ability to creatively use a variety of teaching methods that encourage students to act. Dance dance teacher's role in student motivation for learning is one of the most important. Teacher's responsibility - not only impart knowledge, to develop capacity and skills, but also to create an environment that promotes intellectual and emotional expression of students. This creative environment depends on the creation of dance teacher's personality, dance teacher teaching abilities, professional competence and communication with students. In other words, the same dance teacher's personality can be seen as a dance student learning motivation factor. It is difficult to separate the personality from the profession, particularly in the areas of fuel requires constant interaction with other people. The persipynimas obvious case of a teacher. In order to reveal pinavertės and mature personality traits can be based on psychological literature. Psychology, understanding the structure of a single personality nėra.Todėl to reveal the most important personality characteristics, it is to answer three questions: what the personality and where it is, what it can, what it is (Butkienė A. Kepalaitė 1996). Based on these issues suggests that the psychological structure of personality can be divided into the following: the orientation of the intentions, needs, interests, value attitudes, worldview and beliefs, temperament, character, ability, emotion and will. (Butkienė, Kepalaitė, 1996 ) Educational theory and educational practice is important not only for personal research but nothing is more important, and reason in principle and Diversity awareness and knowledge. However, the reasons are not static: they occur, evolve, and, depending on the situation, may enhance or weaken. Some reasons - short-term, others long-term stimulation of human activity. Grounds of origin and dynamics of matter is very important teachers who care about learning effectiveness and motivation of its determinants. Psychology and Educational Sciences reasons dynamics of recognition is very important paving the way for search performance. Reasons creates a single mindedness to learn, and the target depends on what the specific learning factors. The reasons are varied in its depth, the level of aggregation: one which derives from the needs of other interests, the fear of life of goodwill. The authors stress that the reasons arising from the needs of very effective, because the needs of expressing the necessary, vital body and the spiritual life of the contacts with external conditions, which can overcome the shortcomings. The value of the various motives vary: some considerations to keep learning more, others less, one must be more motivated reasoning powers of the younger school age, the other - the older. Learning is enhanced by all types of reasons for the development of social, moral and personal activity of working. For the same reasons of diversity is recognized, it is impossible to create a single, universal theory of motivation, which could explain both animal and human behavior, the reasoning problems of different approaches and different interpretations of the theory. They can be divided conditionally into certain groups: 1st theory of human behavior in reaction to highlight some of the pressure. 2nd theory, which recognizes that human behavior is determined not only the external or internal pressure. 3rd theory explaining human behavior in the inner disposition It can be argued that all discussed various aspects of the theory helps explain individual's behavior and can help teachers, as well as dance teachers seeking to stimulate students' learning motivation. Adapted for the practice of each of these theories can improve educational reality. Reasoning creates a general disposition to learn, but depends on the objectives, what is the specific learning activities.

For two decades, Lithuania is on the way a democratic state, in keeping with the global information space, involvement in the processes of globalization. It promises greater economic, political, socio-cultural and even moral norms and rules, unification, the transition to a new, comprehensive system of values. Professor J. Vaitkevicius (1995) claimed that Lithuanian revival is directly linked to the school and the teacher's renaissance. Values change pasulyje play a major role in the cycle of art subjects, including dance. Pupils' willingness to learn dance strongly influenced by the personality of the teacher - learner psychological characteristics, the subject of dance knowledge and ability to creatively use a variety of teaching methods that encourage students to act. Dance dance teacher's role in student motivation for learning is one of the most important. Teacher's responsibility - not only impart knowledge, to develop capacity and skills, but also to create an environment that promotes intellectual and emotional expression of students. This creative environment depends on the creation of dance teacher's personality, dance teacher teaching abilities, professional competence and communication with students. In other words, the same dance teacher's personality can be seen as a dance student learning motivation factor. It is difficult to separate the personality from the profession, particularly in the areas of fuel requires constant interaction with other people. The persipynimas obvious case of a teacher. In order to reveal pinavertės and mature personality traits can be based on psychological literature. Psychology, understanding the structure of a single personality nėra.Todėl to reveal the most important personality characteristics, it is to answer three questions: what the personality and where it is, what it can, what it is (Butkienė A. Kepalaitė 1996). Based on these issues suggests that the psychological structure of personality can be divided into the following: the orientation of the intentions, needs, interests, value attitudes, worldview and beliefs, temperament, character, ability, emotion and will. (Butkienė, Kepalaitė, 1996 ) Educational theory and educational practice is important not only for personal research but nothing is more important, and reason in principle and Diversity awareness and knowledge. However, the reasons are not static: they occur, evolve, and, depending on the situation, may enhance or weaken. Some reasons - short-term, others long-term stimulation of human activity. Grounds of origin and dynamics of matter is very important teachers who care about learning effectiveness and motivation of its determinants. Psychology and Educational Sciences reasons dynamics of recognition is very important paving the way for search performance. Reasons creates a single mindedness to learn, and the target depends on what the specific learning factors. The reasons are varied in its depth, the level of aggregation: one which derives from the needs of other interests, the fear of life of goodwill. The authors stress that the reasons arising from the needs of very effective, because the needs of expressing the necessary, vital body and the spiritual life of the contacts with external conditions, which can overcome the shortcomings. The value of the various motives vary: some considerations to keep learning more, others less, one must be more motivated reasoning powers of the younger school age, the other - the older. Learning is enhanced by all types of reasons for the development of social, moral and personal activity of working. For the same reasons of diversity is recognized, it is impossible to create a single, universal theory of motivation, which could explain both animal and human behavior, the reasoning problems of different approaches and different interpretations of the theory. They can be divided conditionally into certain groups: 1st theory of human behavior in reaction to highlight some of the pressure. 2nd theory, which recognizes that human behavior is determined not only the external or internal pressure. 3rd theory explaining human behavior in the inner disposition It can be argued that all discussed various aspects of the theory helps explain individual's behavior and can help teachers, as well as dance teachers seeking to stimulate students' learning motivation. Adapted for the practice of each of these theories can improve educational reality. Reasoning creates a general disposition to learn, but depends on the objectives, what is the specific learning activities.

The first part of the master's paper gives an overview of the experience of foreign countries in the implementation of the state zero-energy building concepts. In the review you will see the achievements and challenges of India, the United States and members of the European Union. In both cool and warm climates, the energy efficiency of buildings is sought, with only warm climate countries focusing on reducing the energy consumption of cooling. The second part discusses the methodology of calculations and research. This section reviews the multi-purpose research methods, as well as the simple addetive weight method SAW. In the final and main part of the master's paper, the main currently used thermo-isolating materials are analyzed and compared. These materials of the matched roof of residential building were compared according to selected criteria. The significance of the criteria is determined by the survey method. The survey involved construction workers or related managers, directors, lecturers and other specialists. According to the specialists, the most important indicator at present in construction is the price, and the least important of the selected is the long-term water absorption. The results are obtained using the simple additive weighing method SAW. Polystyrene foam EPS 100 NEO is best suited for the selected roof insulating material. The results and their main factors are discussed in more detail in the calculations and conclusions of this paper.

The first part of the master's paper gives an overview of the experience of foreign countries in the implementation of the state zero-energy building concepts. In the review you will see the achievements and challenges of India, the United States and members of the European Union. In both cool and warm climates, the energy efficiency of buildings is sought, with only warm climate countries focusing on reducing the energy consumption of cooling. The second part discusses the methodology of calculations and research. This section reviews the multi-purpose research methods, as well as the simple addetive weight method SAW. In the final and main part of the master's paper, the main currently used thermo-isolating materials are analyzed and compared. These materials of the matched roof of residential building were compared according to selected criteria. The significance of the criteria is determined by the survey method. The survey involved construction workers or related managers, directors, lecturers and other specialists. According to the specialists, the most important indicator at present in construction is the price, and the least important of the selected is the long-term water absorption. The results are obtained using the simple additive weighing method SAW. Polystyrene foam EPS 100 NEO is best suited for the selected roof insulating material. The results and their main factors are discussed in more detail in the calculations and conclusions of this paper.

The first part of the master's paper gives an overview of the experience of foreign countries in the implementation of the state zero-energy building concepts. In the review you will see the achievements and challenges of India, the United States and members of the European Union. In both cool and warm climates, the energy efficiency of buildings is sought, with only warm climate countries focusing on reducing the energy consumption of cooling. The second part discusses the methodology of calculations and research. This section reviews the multi-purpose research methods, as well as the simple addetive weight method SAW. In the final and main part of the master's paper, the main currently used thermo-isolating materials are analyzed and compared. These materials of the matched roof of residential building were compared according to selected criteria. The significance of the criteria is determined by the survey method. The survey involved construction workers or related managers, directors, lecturers and other specialists. According to the specialists, the most important indicator at present in construction is the price, and the least important of the selected is the long-term water absorption. The results are obtained using the simple additive weighing method SAW. Polystyrene foam EPS 100 NEO is best suited for the selected roof insulating material. The results and their main factors are discussed in more detail in the calculations and conclusions of this paper.