Was erklart politische Patronage in den Landern Westeuropas? Defizite des politischen Wettbewerbs oder historisch-formative Phasen der Massendemokratisierung
In: Politische Vierteljahresschrift: PVS : German political science quarterly, Band 43, Heft 1, S. 20-45
ISSN: 0032-3470
Every major paradigm in the social sciences since the 1950s has offered its own explanation for the varying incidence of party patronage & political clientelism in modern democracies. Today the two main contenders are (RC-based) positive political economy & historical institutionalism. Positive political economy emphasizes the crucial importance of effective political competition as a control device against the ever-present temptation for politicians to use "improper political practices" like patronage or clientelism. Historical institutionalism highlights the importance of formative moments in the history of mass democratization & party formation. The article argues that both approaches suffer from considerable weaknesses. The article proposes a modified historical-institutionalist explanation, which emphasizes the importance of state formation rather than party formation & which explains varying degrees & different forms of political patronage in Europe with different paths of modern state-building. 3 Tables, 1 Illustration, 1 Appendix, 73 References. Adapted from the source document.