Colonialism and settler colonialism: A comparison
In: Australian outlook: journal of the Australian Institute of International Affairs, Band 33, Heft 3, S. 339-351
277 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Australian outlook: journal of the Australian Institute of International Affairs, Band 33, Heft 3, S. 339-351
In: The Economic Journal, Band 86, Heft 342, S. 417
In: Commonwealth and comparative politics, Band 15, Heft 1, S. 84-88
ISSN: 1743-9094
In: Pacific affairs: an international review of Asia and the Pacific, Band 51, Heft 4, S. 709
ISSN: 1715-3379
In: The economic history review, Band 30, Heft 1, S. 212
ISSN: 1468-0289
In: African affairs: the journal of the Royal African Society, Band 78, Heft 313, S. 567-568
ISSN: 1468-2621
In: African affairs: the journal of the Royal African Society, Band 75, Heft 298, S. 111-112
ISSN: 1468-2621
In: Le mouvement social, Heft 107, S. 135
ISSN: 1961-8646
In: African economic history, Heft 4, S. 186
ISSN: 2163-9108
In: Journal of Palestine studies, Band 9, Heft 4, S. 131-135
ISSN: 1533-8614
In: The Middle East journal, Band 30, Heft 4, S. 501
ISSN: 0026-3141
In: Worldview, Band 23, Heft 6, S. 23-24
Internal colonialism has beeome a popular term in academic parlance. Although suggested in the writings of Lenin, it was probably first developed by the Mexican intellectual Pablo Gonzales Casanova, who employed the term in his Democracy in Mexico to describe the relationship between the Mexican Government and the Indian population. In the United States it has since been used to characterize the status of virtually every minority. The charge is made that blacks, Mexican- Americans, Indians, and even women have been colonized. Virtually all culturally pluralistic societies— outside the socialist bloc—are now stigmatized as instances of internal colonialism.
In: NACLA report on the Americas, Band 13, Heft 5, S. 12-37
In: Telos, Band 34, S. 5-48
ISSN: 0040-2842, 0090-6514
An assessment of the meaning of Stalinism as a case of internal colonialism. Rejected are both Cold War interpretations (& more recent French variations) that see Stalinism as a logical consequence of Marxism, as well as Marxist apologies, which dismiss it as merely a 'Russian accident' explainable in terms of backwardness & otherwise insurmountable historical obstacles. Stalinism is seen as essentially a matter of property transfer carried out with the help of terror administered by a massive bureaucracy & secret police apparatus. The continuity between Stalinism & the 'scientific Marxism' model is emphasized. The Stalinist theory of crime & punishment which guided the terror is analyzed. The contrast with Maoism is explained. Modified HA.
In: International affairs: a Russian journal of world politics, diplomacy and international relations, Heft 3, S. 65-75
ISSN: 0130-9641
World Affairs Online