Comparative Regionalism
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies
"Comparative Regionalism" published on by Oxford University Press.
1104 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies
"Comparative Regionalism" published on by Oxford University Press.
In: Library of essays in international relations
In: Regionalism / ed. by Philippe De Lombaerde ..., 4
World Affairs Online
This book comprises key essays on comparative regionalism and, more broadly, on regional conflict and cooperation by Professor Etel Solingen. The study of regionalism, a subject pioneered by Solingen in the 1990s, is now an established field of inquiry, with a large community of scholars and practitioners around the world. This book provides a window into an evolving conceptual framework for comparing regional arrangements, with a special emphasis on non-European regions. Framed by a comprehensive, previously unpublished introduction, the chapters provide a broad spectrum of analysis.
In: The library of essays in international relations
In: Rethinking Regionalism, S. 62-78
In: Global governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 186
ISSN: 2468-0958, 1075-2846
In: Global governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 186
ISSN: 2468-0958, 1075-2846
In: Oxford handbooks online
In: Political science
A systematic and wide-ranging survey of the scholarship on regionalism, regionalisation, and regional governance. Unpacking the major debates, leading authors of the field synthesise the state of the art, provide a guide to the comparative study of regionalism, and identify future avenues of research.
In: Review of international studies: RIS, Band 36, Heft 3, S. 731-753
ISSN: 1469-9044
AbstractThere is virtually no systematic debate on the fundamentals of comparative research in the study of international regionalism. The field of research is very fragmented and there is a lack of interaction between EU studies and regionalism in the rest of the world. There is also a lack of communication between scholars from various theoretical standpoints and research traditions. Related to these two divides is the tension between idiographic and nomothetic methodologies. The purpose of this article is to contribute to the largely neglected debate on how to conduct and address three interrelated problems: a conceptual, a theoretical and a methodological one. Our claim is that the future of comparative regionalism should be one where old divides are bridged. This requires a combination of conceptual rigor, theoretical eclecticism, and sounder empirical research methods.
In: Review of International Studies, Band 36, Heft 3, S. 731-753
SSRN
1\. Introduction 2\. The History of Regionalism: European Integration and Beyond 3\. The Outcome of Regionalism: Inter-, Supra- or Post-National? 3.1 From Cooperation to Integration 3.2 New and Old Regionalism 3.3 Persisting Diversity or Emerging Similarity? 4\. The Drivers of Regionalism: Old Theories and New Puzzles 4.1 The Demand for Regionalism. It Is Not Only the Economy, Stupid! 4.2 The Supply of Regionalism. Interests, Power, and Norms 5\. When Regionalism Hits Home. Policy Harmonization and Structural Change 5.1 From Second Image Reversed. 5.2 . to Europeanization and Domestic Change 6\. Conclusions Literature ; After the end of the Cold War, students of International Relations observed an expansion of inter-state activities at the regional level. Regional and sub- regional groupings appeared to gain momentum as the way in which countries cooperate and should cooperate to pursue peace, stability, wealth and social justice. The surge and resurgence of regionalism has triggered the proliferation of concepts and approaches. The focus of this paper will be on processes and structures of state-led regionalism driven by the delegation of policies and political authority to regional institutions. Based on this understanding of regionalism, the existing literature will be reviewed with regard to three general questions. These questions do not only require research across regions but also allow developing a common research agenda to accumulate knowledge generated about specific regions. First, what are the outcomes of regionalism? How can we describe and compare the results of the delegation of policies and political authority? Second, what are the drivers of regionalism? Why do some governments choose to delegate policies and political authority while others do not? Finally, what are the internal effects of regionalism? How does the delegation of policies and political authority impact back on the domestic structures of the states involved?
BASE
In: Handbook of International Relations, S. 503-530