Competition Policy and Innovation
International audience ; L'article analyse les complémentarités et les tensions entre la concurrence et l'innovation tant du point de vue des instruments d'analyse que du point de vue des politiques économiques.
5082 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
International audience ; L'article analyse les complémentarités et les tensions entre la concurrence et l'innovation tant du point de vue des instruments d'analyse que du point de vue des politiques économiques.
BASE
In: European economy, Heft 3, S. 171-197
ISSN: 0379-0991
World Affairs Online
In: Australian journal of public administration: the journal of the Royal Institute of Public Administration Australia, Band 55, Heft 2, S. 100-103
ISSN: 0313-6647
In: Competition Policy in the European Union, S. 179-193
In: Perspective Paper Series, No. 4
World Affairs Online
World Affairs Online
In: Economic affairs: journal of the Institute of Economic Affairs, Band 10, Heft 3, S. 22-23
ISSN: 1468-0270
How large a role is there for government in competition policy? Graham Mather, general director of the Institute of Economic Affairs and a part‐time member of the Monopolies and Mergers Commission, argues the case for loosening the Stock Exchange listing requirements.
Only recently, competition authorities tend to agree on comparative advertising being helpful in promoting competition. They now encourage firms to use it. They reason that comparative advertising, if fair and not misleading, increases consumers' information about alternative brands. For this to work, comparative claims must be credible. Competition policy and legal practice are essential in making comparative advertising (directly and indirectly) informative. In this paper, first we provide a legal background of comparative advertising in in Europe and the US. Second, we provide an economic analysis of comparative advertising. Here, we discuss the ways comparative advertising can affect market outcomes. Third, we provide an analysis of some recent legal cases in Europe and the US. Overall, we focus on the scope of information transmission through comparative advertising and on the way antitrust laws affect it.
BASE
Only recently, competition authorities tend to agree on comparative advertising being helpful in promoting competition. They now encourage firms to use it. They reason that comparative advertising, if fair and not misleading, increases consumers' information about alternative brands. For this to work, comparative claims must be credible. Competition policy and legal practice are essential in making comparative advertising (directly and indirectly) informative. In this paper, first we provide a legal background of comparative advertising in in Europe and the US. Second, we provide an economic analysis of comparative advertising. Here, we discuss the ways comparative advertising can affect market outcomes. Third, we provide an analysis of some recent legal cases in Europe and the US. Overall, we focus on the scope of information transmission through comparative advertising and on the way antitrust laws affect it.
BASE
In: Australian journal of public administration, Band 55, Heft 2, S. 104-105
ISSN: 1467-8500
Identifying the 'downside' of competition policy raises the question of whether there is an 'up‐side'. Competition is supposed to drive the organisers of commodity production to minimise the costs they have to bear in some short to medium term, within environments more or less circumscribed by government regulations. The actual period tends to be that for which the providers of finance are prepared to wait for returns after a poorly performing company is restructured. Economists used to say that cost minimisation requires an industry structure in which there are many independent producers. Nowadays, more enlightened writers speak of ensuring that the market positions held by existing producers are contestable by prospective new producers.The question of what government in Australia may do to establish competition in this sense of competition has recently focussed on the desirable re‐organisation of public enterprises, perhaps especially those that exist at the level of the states. So what are the dimensions of the 'downside' of opening the market positions occupied by public enterprises to contestation by private companies, especially those which are monopolies? The answer takes a large measure of the gloss off the Hilmer promises. The problems to be addressed are: the limit put on contestability where there is an element of natural monopoly; the tendency for cost minimisation to depend on the tighter management of labour; and, the difficulty of insisting simultaneously on both 'competition' and the satisfaction of 'community service obligations' (CSOs).
In: Microeconomic Policy
In: Economists of the twentieth century