Constructivism and Justice
In: Hayek and Modern Liberalism, S. 46-83
69 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Hayek and Modern Liberalism, S. 46-83
In: Bagheri Noaparast, Khosrow (1995) Toward a more Realistic Constructivism in "Advances in Personal Construct Psychology", Neimeyer & Neimeyer (eds), Vol. 3, pp. 37-59, Jai Press: London.
SSRN
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 89, Heft 1, S. 135-162
ISSN: 1573-0964
In: Equality and Liberty, S. 196-216
In: Analyse & Kritik: journal of philosophy and social theory, Band 14, Heft 1, S. 18-32
ISSN: 2365-9858
Abstract
This essay argues that Rawls's recent constructivist approach waivers between a relativist defense and a more Kantian account which grounds his conception of justice in the idea of an agreement between free and equal moral persons. It is suggested that this ambiguity lies at the center of his attempt to provide a "political not metaphysical" account which is also not "political in the wrong way".
In: Smith College studies in social work, Band 63, Heft 2, S. 127-146
ISSN: 1553-0426
In: Science, technology, & human values: ST&HV, Band 20, Heft 3, S. 332-351
ISSN: 1552-8251
This article explores possibilities for establishing dialogues between feminism and constructivism in the field of technology studies. Based on an overview of Norwegian feminist debates about technology, it indicates several points where feminism and constructivism meet and can mutually benefit from each other. The article critically examines feminist studies questioning the problems of technological determinism, social deternacnism, and essentialism. It criticizes constructivism for a lack of concern for gender and politics but holds that it is still possible to use theoretical tools from constructivism in feminist analyses. Fruitful dialogues require the application of the principle of symmetry to the dcalogues and sharing some common ground and mutual recognation of each other's strengths and weaknesses
In: The University of Western Ontario series in philosophy of science 44
In: Studies in mathematics education series 6
In: Behavioral science, Band 36, Heft 4, S. 274-297
In: Princeton studies in culture/power/history
In: Children & Schools, Band 17, Heft 1, S. 63-64
ISSN: 1545-682X
In: Man: the journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, Band 29, Heft 4, S. 1014
In: The journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps: JASH, Band 19, Heft 3, S. 191-195
Facilitated communication, a technique that is said to enhance the communicative abilities of individuals with severe language impairments, has engendered much controversy. Biklen and Duchan (1994) and Green and Shane (1994) present two sides of this controversy. Biklen and Duchan argue that from a constructivist's perspective, the primary issue is the underlying cultural presuppositions regarding mental retardation and science rather than the efficacy of facilitated communication. Green and Shane present research evidence challenging the efficacy of facilitated communication within a positivist's framework. We present a brief review of science as viewed through positivists' and constructivists' lenses. Using the framework of social constructivism adopted by Biklen and Duchan, we disagree with them on three points: (a) even though the process of constructing scientific knowledge is strongly affected by human social, emotional, and cognitive processes, it also involves matters of fact that cannot be ignored; (b) social constructivists' accounts of science can be accepted as descriptive without being prescriptive; (c) although we cannot prove that belief systems, including positivism and social constructivism, are true or false in the larger sense, belief systems have differential consequences for technological changes of the type that are valued by persons with severe impairments of communication.