Suchergebnisse

Journey of the indonesia cannot be separated from the whose name corruption, various problems corruption then make a nation it tries to with very hard to do the eradication of corruption, then now kpk, the commission would grow up and incarnate as a power terlembaga, however kpk but many that blocks, so that his movement often in politician, in addition problems arise related the area of that causes limited kpk in running tasks and functions. Then institutions here needed in regions have motion based in society to be opposition from government in the fight against corruption the , one of which is unfortunate corruptions watch that is unfortunate highway , to attract football to scrutinize about lunge mcw as of a motion social , this research use the model descriptive qualitative , with data source of interviews and documentation. MCW is non-governmental organizations which has grown and developed social as of a motion that which appears or present of former activist in the era of reformasi, mcw use 3 strategies in efforts to eradicate corruption namely, prevention, law enforcement, anti-corruption education.

The research aims to analyze the implementation of Sufism values to prevent corruption in PT. Telkom Witel Medan. This research uses qualitative methods. In this research, the researcher analyzed module books that were used as a guide for lecturers in PT. Telkom. Besides, the researcher interviewed members of the Board of Prosperity Mosque, namely, the manager of lectures, lecturers, and the management of PT. Telkom Witel Medan. This research shows that the values of Sufism, which is implemented in PT. Telkom Witel Medan has been quite effective in preventing corruption, even though it is not the only determinant. At the national level, this success is evidenced by the achievement of the Best of the best BUMN in the Mental Revolution Award 2018. PT Telkom also won two awards from the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) as an Institution with the best Implementation of the State Assets Property Report (LHKPN) 2018 and BUMN with the Best Gratuity Control System in 2018.

Purpose of the study: This paper will discuss the application of maqasid al shariah as a benchmark in the Corruption Measurement Model (CMM) based on Maqasid Syariah. Dimensions to be assessed on maqasid al shariah based on the opinions of Syathibi include hifdzun Dhin, hifdzun an-nafsh, hifdzun al-aql, hifdzun an-nasl, and hifdzun al-maal. Methodology: In addition to successfully formulating all the relevant details of maqasid al shariah for corruption measurement, this study is the first research that uses quantitative methods like ANOVA on data from all provinces in Indonesia. Main findings: The result is the average score from the Corruption Measurement Model (CMM) in Indonesia which is found to be good enough. The empirical study using ANOVA shows that there is no significant difference in the maqasid dimension among provinces in Indonesia, with a significance of 0.05. Applications of this study: The results of this study enables researcher, practitioner and policy maker to understand the implication of corruption and its impact on the society. Novelty/ Originality of this study: The application of maqasid al shariah is tested to explain the impact of corruption on the inadequacy of infrastructure and inefficient bureaucracy.

Foreign direct investment is the largest source of external funds in both developed and developing countries. Some literature explains that one of the barriers to investment flow is corruption. Thus, this study aims to determine the effect of corruption as measured by the corruption perception index on foreign direct investment. Corruption is a political risk that affects the flow of foreign direct investment. The estimation results of the Generalized Method of Moment (GMM) show that the corruption perception index has a significant positive effect on foreign direct investment. The author also uses market seeking and efficiency seeking variables as potential factors that influence investors to direct foreign direct investment.

The rise of corruption cases that occur in Indonesia today, if we see corruption cases in Indonesia every year is always increasing, not decreasing, this causes people to feel angry with corruptors. The percentage and network of corruption Angelina Sondakh of the Supreme Court Judge's Decision No. 1616k / Pis.Sus / 2013 is quite interesting to examine especially if we can see who the dominant actors are in this case, both from the planning process, the bidding process, the bid evaluation process, and implementation and evaluation. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach which illustrates the phenomenon of Angelina sondakh corruption case in the Supreme Court's Decision No. 1616 K / Pid.Sus / 2013. Descriptive analysis in this study uses the Nvivo 12 Plus software. Data from this study were sourced from the Supreme Court Decision No. 1616 K / Pid.Sus / 2013 and previous research relating to the Corruption of Angelina Sondakh. The results of this discussion The conclusions that the author can take from the presentation of the analysis above are based on the decision of the Supreme Court No. 1616 K / Pid.Sus / 2013 analyzed with Nvivo 12 Plus in general from the four processes above can be seen Corporate 9.05%, Government 7.62%, Political Parties 0.32% and Political Consultants 0%. Keyword: Corruption; Bribery; Network

Theologia : Jurnal Teologi Interdisipliner. Vol. 1, no. 1, Februari 2014, p. 1 - 15 ; This paper deals with Corruption, Collution and Nepotism which become very deteriorate habits in many developing countries in Asia, especially Indonesia. It shows various negative effects of corruption for building a community of peace and justice for all. Within this paper, the author also tries to make some remarks about the reasons why corruption is practiced by many people even though they are aware of its destructive impacts. Among the reasons mentioned in this paper, the author makes a long explanation on sociological and theological reasons. Question as to how to get rid of a society from corruption, collution and nepotism forms an important part of this paper. The author argues that these deteriorate habits can not be totally eliminated. It can only be reduced. Education, according to the author, plays a substantial role in reducing these problems

Corruption is a crime against humanity which is classified as an extraordinary crime. The reform movement that took place in 1998 was motivated by public distrust of the ruling government at that time which was thought to be full of collusion, corruption and nepotism (KKN). After the government in power at that time fell, it was followed by a reformation government. One of the agendas of the reform government is the Eradication of Collusion, Corruption and Nepotism (KKN). Various efforts have been made by the government in preventing and eradicating corruption but corruption is still growing. In the midst of rampant corruption committed by public officials, who in fact mostly come from Political Party cadres, it is only natural for political parties (Parpol) to take responsibility and play a role in anti-corruption measures. Through this paper the author tries to look at the factors behind public officials committing acts of corruption, most of which are thought to come from political party cadres (parpol) and see the role of political parties in the prevention and eradication of corruption.From the above discussion, it can be concluded that all efforts and actions through various approaches have been made by law enforcement officials to prevent and eradicate corruption that has been running for years in this country. The responsibility of political parties (parpol) can be started from the recruitment of party cadres before being distributed to various public positions in the government. Political parties are also responsible for cadres who are involved in criminal acts of corruption by not obstructing law enforcers in the investigation and investigation process carried out.Keywords: Political parties, prevention and eradication of corruption.

The purpose of this study is to ascertain the causal link between corruption and sustainable development. The Corruption Perception Index (CPI), Human Development Index (HDI), Carbon Dioxide Emissions (CO2), and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) variables were used in this study. The data for this analysis were derived from secondary sources such as the World Bank, the United Nations Development Programme, and Transparency International. The stationary test, cointegration test, optimum lag test, and Granger causality test were all employed in this study. The study's findings indicate that corruption and sustainable development are causally related. Corruption and sustainable development have a two-way causative link from a socioeconomic viewpoint, a one-way causal relationship from an environmental perspective, and a one-way causation relationship between corruption and foreign direct investment. Corruption has proven to be an obstacle to the sustainable development of every country.

The style of building our constitutional legal system today is very varied, it has implications for the shifting functions and rights of the State organs including the State organs of the Republic of Indonesia House of Representatives. To understand the conception of the functions and rights of the organs of the Republic of Indonesia Representative Council (DPR RI), it is seen as two sides of a coin (two sides of one coin). The DPR RI's inquiry right is a supervision that must be carried out on policies implemented by the executive. The KPK is an organ that is within the executive family, because it carries out investigations, investigations and prosecutions of corruption cases, such as those carried out by the Prosecutors' Office and the Police. Thus if the KPK is referred to as part of the judiciary. The task of investigation, investigation and prosecution is the task of the executive, not the legislative and judiciary. In addition, the KPK has been an institution that uses the State budget, so it should be overseen by the DPR. if the DPR cannot exercise the right to question the KPK on the grounds of independence. The reason is, it is not right to refuse the right to question the KPK. With the decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) in the main essence of the decision which positions the KPK in institutions that are in the realm of power, the executive for carrying out the task of investigation, investigation and prosecution in corruption, which is actually the same as the authority of the police and prosecutors. The KPK is a state institution that is within the executive power cluster, so the KPK can be the object of using the DPR's questionnaire right as the people's representative who carries out the supervisory function. But the use of the questionnaire right by the DPR cannot be applied in the case that the KPK is carrying out its investigative, investigative and prosecution tasks. This means that the KPK cannot be carried out while the KPK is carrying out its duties. ; The style of building our constitutional legal system today is very varied, it has implications for the shifting functions and rights of the State organs including the State organs of the Republic of Indonesia House of Representatives. To understand the conception of the functions and rights of the organs of the Republic of Indonesia Representative Council (DPR RI), it is seen as two sides of a coin (two sides of one coin). The DPR RI's inquiry right is a supervision that must be carried out on policies implemented by the executive. The KPK is an organ that is within the executive family, because it carries out investigations, investigations and prosecutions of corruption cases, such as those carried out by the Prosecutors' Office and the Police. Thus if the KPK is referred to as part of the judiciary. The task of investigation, investigation and prosecution is the task of the executive, not the legislative and judiciary. In addition, the KPK has been an institution that uses the State budget, so it should be overseen by the DPR. if the DPR cannot exercise the right to question the KPK on the grounds of independence. The reason is, it is not right to refuse the right to question the KPK. With the decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) in the main essence of the decision which positions the KPK in institutions that are in the realm of power, the executive for carrying out the task of investigation, investigation and prosecution in corruption, which is actually the same as the authority of the police and prosecutors. The KPK is a state institution that is within the executive power cluster, so the KPK can be the object of using the DPR's questionnaire right as the people's representative who carries out the supervisory function. But the use of the questionnaire right by the DPR cannot be applied in the case that the KPK is carrying out its investigative, investigative and prosecution tasks. This means that the KPK cannot be carried out while the KPK is carrying out its duties.

APBD is one of the most potential target to be corrupted by the irresponsible government officer. For that reason, the participation of the society is needed in arranging APBD because it's related to environment of the society itself, in which the individual and the organization are placed, and also the norms so that the corruption of the APBD could be reduced. The society doesn't aware that they will take disadvantage of the corruption. The fight toward corruption will be success if the society wants to get involved. The purpose of this research is to find out the impact factors which affect the corruption of local fund (APBD) in West Sumatra. Those factors are: the attitude of the individual, governmental organization, and the control. This analysis is based on data taken from 228 responder from local government, academics, and students by using questioner. The method used on this research is multiple regression analysis method. The result of the analysis shows that the attitude of the individual, governmental organization and the control have a significant effect toward corruption of the local fund (APBD) in West Sumatra. Keywords: the attitude of the individual, governmental organization, the control, and corruption of APBD

Abstract Corruption is a criminal act that breaks and against the state law and the religion law. Due tothe fact that this corruption is not only prohibited by the greatest one God but the effectivelegislation rule as well. Furthermore, the corruption can bring about a loss to all side. Forinstance; being able to make a misery society and country, locking the country economygrowth rapidity, putting in disorder country, being able to bring about a bad image for thecountry on the international people's view, in addition to, being able to cut down the countrythrust level on the international worl eithin doing cooperation, mainly in economy sector. Evenfor further more, the corruption make afraid of all foreigner investors to invest their stock orshare in Indonesia.On the other hand, the corruption can also induce the blocked project being carried out inourselves country as well as can hamper routine's job of the country. Thus the corruption actcan become the cause of the stopped country advance or progress. As a final point, thosecorruptors' re properly given a punishment dealing with their deed. Even a great deal ofsociety group wish those corruptors to be killed out or be given as a death sentence or in otherwords, at least is to be imposed as heavy as punishment in order to making them discourageto redo their deed. As a matter of the fact, this is only an example for other people who want todo what was done by the perpetrators before. In the long run, the corruption level can bedecreased in this our motherland's country.Keywords: the corrupt criminal act constitution, constituonal law, the effectivelegislation rule, Islamic law, Al-Qur'an & Al-Hadist.