Suchergebnisse

Editors: Jan. 1922- Giangastone Bolla and others ; Includes section "Libri e riviste." ; Beginning with v. 11, in two parts separately paged ; Mode of access: Internet.

The principle of respecting the separation of political forces in a society gives the legal system the right to issue orders on people's complaints based on the laws approved by the legislative power. There is no question that laws, like other man-made things, have shortcomings. These decisions include the rupture and even the conflict between two or more articles of the law that provoke the creation of different policies in the court of justice and the punitive court of Iran. With a documentary methodology, this article attempts to study the conflicts between different punitive laws and their effect on the creation of different policies in the courts of Iran. It is concluded that, in many cases, due to different reasons there may be defects in the law or in the interpretation of the law that generate defect, ambiguity, clash between laws and contradiction. The existence of all these failures in different cases will cause conflicts between the judges of the criminal courts and these conflicts are the source of the creation of different legal procedures in the criminal courts and in the short time analyzed.

This article discusses the role of the Russian court in accusatory criminal proceedings. At the legislative and practical levels, there is uncertainty about the degree of judicial activity in relation to the question of evidence. The theoretical model of the accusatory system assumes that there is minimal judicial intervention in the investigative proceedings of the parties. The latter must act and defend their position in the criminal case. The court is supposed to have a passive stance. The methodological basis of this study is composed of general scientific and legal methods such as dialectical, historical, systematic, comparative legal, formal-logical methods, etc. Most countries that practice an accusatory model of criminal justice grant the court a certain level of action that allows it to participate fully in the evidence during trials. By way of conclusion, it is suggested to improve the capabilities of the Russian court to actively investigate the evidence, as well as to offer new forms of defense to the parties.

At head of title, 19 : Ministerio de Justicia ; Beginning with 1891 issued as 1.-2. serie, each with 4 to 5 pts.: Legislación y disposiciones de la administración central; Jurisprudencia civil; Jurisprudencia criminal; Competencias, jurisprudencia administrativa y contencioso-administrativo (varies slightly); Jurisprudencia social y de las jurisdicciones especiales ; Issues for 1814-97 called t. 1-162 ; "Edición oficial," 1856- ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Title varies: 1814-33, Decretos del rey don Fernando VII (varies slightly).--1834-36, Decretos de la reina Isabel II.--1837-45, Coleccion de las leyes, decretos y declaraciones de la Cortes ; FOR COMPLETE RECORD SEE CHECKLIST ; Separately cataloged subseries as continued 1891- are: pt. 1, Spain. Laws, statutes, etc. Legislación y disposiciones de la administración central; [pt. 2, v. 1] Spain. Consejo de Estado, Sentencias; pt. 2 [v. 2] Spain. Tribunal de lo Contencioso--administrativa. Jurisprudencia administrativa; [pt. 3, v. 1] Spain. Tribunal Supremo. Sentencias . en materia civil; pt. 3 [v. 2] Spain. Courts. Jurisprudencia civil; pt. 4 [v. 2] Spain. Courts. Jurisprudencia criminal. [pt. 5] Spain. Tribunal Supremo. Sentencias . Recursos de casación ; Includes 3 separately cataloged subseries not numb. with the main work: Sentencias del Tribunal Supremo, 1846-1891; Sentencias del Consejo de Estado, 1877-90. (Classed as [pt. 3, v. 1 & 2] and [pt. 2, v. 1] respectively.)

The violence of Mexico's so-called "war on drugs" has caught the attention of the international community, with calls for the International Criminal Court (ICC) to turn its attention to the country. If they're successful, high-level government officials - or even leaders of drug trafficking organizations - may be prosecuted in the Hague. But it's a difficult road ahead. ; News Analysis (InSight Crime Foundation)

"Compilato per cura di una società di magistrati, professori di diritto e giureconsulti del regno." ; Subtitle varies: v. 1-23, Raccolta generale delle decisioni delle corti di cassazione e di appello in materia civile . ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Supersedes Annali di giurisprudenza. cf. List of the serial publications of foreign governments ; FOR COMPLETE RECORD SEE CHECKLIST

This article intends to examine Hans Kelsen's contribution to the establishing of the first Austrian Constitutional court, analyzing the key differences between Kelsen's model of Constitutional court and that of his German mentor, the Jurist Georg Jelline ; Este artículo pretende examinar la contribución de Hans Kelsen al establecimiento de la primera corte constitucional austriaca, analizando las diferencias clave entre el modelo de corte constitucional de Kelsen y el de su mentor alemán, el jurista Georg J

This article shows most important history's backgrounds for Criminal Militar Justice and how that backgrounds gave support to Criminal Militar Regulations, and it also shows previousWar Council or Marcial Court Structure, it's jurisdiction, crimes and people qere covered by that jurisdiction, and at the end a review and conclutions of most important laws of precedents about this subject. ; El presente artículo muestra un recuento de los antecedentes históricos más relevantes, que dieron origen y sustento al régimen penal militar actual, donde se observa cómo estaba conformado un Consejo de Guerra o Corte Marcial, cuál era su campo de aplicación, qué delitos y personas eran sometidas a su conocimiento y cual su procedimiento, para terminar con un recuento de las principales posiciones jurisprudenciales relacionadas con este tema.

This article shows most important history's backgrounds for Criminal Militar Justice and how that backgrounds gave support to Criminal Militar Regulations, and it also shows previousWar Council or Marcial Court Structure, it's jurisdiction, crimes and people qere covered by that jurisdiction, and at the end a review and conclutions of most important laws of precedents about this subject. ; El presente artículo muestra un recuento de los antecedentes históricos más relevantes, que dieron origen y sustento al régimen penal militar actual, donde se observa cómo estaba conformado un Consejo de Guerra o Corte Marcial, cuál era su campo de aplicación, qué delitos y personas eran sometidas a su conocimiento y cual su procedimiento, para terminar con un recuento de las principales posiciones jurisprudenciales relacionadas con este tema.

This article studies the process of establishing a supreme court under the government of the King of Spain Josep Bonaparte between 1808 and 1812 by Napoleon's Bonaparte initiative. It first describes the formation of a court of cassation in the drafting of the Constitution of Bayonne (1808), following the model of the French of Cassation Court and with the influence of other Napoleonic constitutions. Then, it analyses the process of development of an overall reform of the tribunals, and the different models of supreme court that were considered, from the Chamartin decrees (December 1808) and since the creation of the «Juntas Contenciosas» in 1809 until 1812. Finally, the article presents the study of the decrees that configured the general reform of the courts and created the new «Court of Replacement» («Tribunal de Reposición») in June and July 1812. ; Este artículo estudia el proceso de establecimiento del Tribunal de Reposición durante el periodo del gobierno del rey José Bonaparte en España entre 1808 y 1812. Describe en primer lugar la formación de un tribunal de casación o de reposición en los trabajos de elaboración de la Constitución de Bayona (1808), a iniciativa de Napoleón, siguiendo el modelo de la corte de casación francesa, y con la influencia de otras constituciones napoleónicas. Seguidamente analiza el proceso de gestación de una reforma general de los tribunales y los modelos que se barajan para tribunal de reposición, a partir de la aprobación de los decretos de Chamartín de 4 de diciembre de 1808 y desde la creación de las Juntas Contenciosas en 1809. Y concluye con el estudio de los decretos que configuraron la reforma general de los tribunales y que crearon el Tribunal de Reposición en 1812.

La Constitución de la República Federal del Brasil de 1988 estableció un conjunto de competencias privativas del Tribunal Supremo Federal para ejercer el control jurisdiccional. Consagra un tribunal competente para decidir las acciones abstractas de inconstitucionalidad contra la mayoría de las disposiciones legales, independientemente de las situaciones específicas a las que se aplican. Este sistema concentrado de control jurisdiccional coexiste con la simultaneidad de los dos modelos tradicionales. El artículo desarrolla la ideología judicial que domina el discurso de la Corte Suprema el cual se mantiene fiel a la imagen de Kelsen de ser un "legislador negativo".