Suchergebnisse

In preliminary proceedings, for which for the purposes of this paper we mean part of the procedure in which authority conducting proceedings is public prosecutor, prosecutor's offices in Serbia have been making decisions for ten years that according to the CPC they can not make. First, decisions of dismissal of criminal complaint are made when the prosecutor, after undertaking criminal prosecution in preliminary proceedings for criminal offences for which a fine or a term of imprisonment of up to eight years shall be prescribed as the principal penalty, determines that there is not a sufficient degree of probability that the defendant committed the crime. Second mistake is the decision of dismissal of criminal complaint in a situation when the criminal proceedings began by the issuance of a ruling ordering detention before submitting a motion to indict in summary proceedings. The third mistake is issuing an order discontinuing the investigation after the conclusion of the investigation. In the first and third case, a decision to abandon criminal prosecution should be made and in the second case, the public prosecutor should submit a statement of abandoning criminal prosecution to the judge for the preliminary proceedings after which that judge will issue a ruling discontinuing criminal proceedings.

Intro -- Contents -- Preface -- Introduction -- CRIME, GENDER, AND SEXUALITY IN CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS -- Violence, Vendetta, and Peacemaking in Late Medieval Bologna -- Female Criminality and Subversion in Early Modern Ireland -- Foucault Redux?: The Roles of Humanism, Protestantism, and an Urban Elite in Creating the London Bridewell, 1500- 1560 -- Blackmail as a Crime of Sexual Indiscretion in Eighteenth- Century England -- Henry Mayhew and the Criminal Classes of Victorian England: The Case Reopened -- Consolidation of the Raj: Notes from a Police Station in British India, 1865- 1928 -- The White Slave Trade and the British Empire -- Book Review Essay: New Directions in the History of Crime and the Law in Early Modern England -- Book Reviews -- Index -- About the Editor and Contributors.

Violence, vendetta, and peacemaking in late medieval Bologna / Trevor Dean -- Female criminality and subversion in early modern Ireland / Andrea Knox -- Foucault 'Redux'? : the roles of humanism, protestantism, and an urban elite in creating the London Bridewell, 1500-1560 / Lee Beier -- Blackmail as a crime of sexual indiscretion in eighteenth-century England / Antony Simpson -- Henry Mayhew and the criminal classes of Victorian England : the case reopened / David Englander -- Consolidation of the Raj : notes from a police station in British India, 1865-1928 / Arvind Verma -- The White slave trade and the British Empire / Philippa Levine -- Book review essay : New directions in the history of crime and the law in early modern England / by Malcolm Gaskill -- Book reviews

Currently, they are attracting public attention and causing public resonance problems associated with the reassessment of the feat of the Soviet people in World War II. Various kinds of insinuations arise related to the denial of the persecution and mass extermination of Jews living in Germany, in the territory of its allies and in the territories occupied by them during the Second World War; the systematic persecution and extermination of European Jews by Nazi Germany and collaborators during 1933-1945. Practice shows that those guilty of Holocaust denial try to avoid criminal liability and influence judicial practice, referring to freedom of speech enshrined in Art. 5 Abs. 1 of the Basic Law of Germany. The purpose of the article. Investigate the institution of criminal responsibility for Holocaust denial in Germany. Based on an analysis of the norms of criminal law and judicial practice in Germany in specific criminal cases, investigate the difficulty of delimiting criminal liability for denying the Holocaust freedom of expression. Methodology and methods. For the purposes of this article, the author uses the methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, diduction, as well as comparative legal, historical legal and historical comparative methods. Conclusions. After conducting a study, the author concludes that in Germany the issue of criminal liability for Holocaust denial is complex. The article points out the fact of heterogeneity of court decisions, analysis of judicial practice shows that this issue is resolved extremely ambiguously. Despite this, the author points out the high role of the legislator and the practice of law enforcement in shaping the right attitude to historical events, the high role of peoples in certain significant facts that are part of the foundation of historical and cultural heritage. Scope of the results. This work may be of interest to students of higher educational institutions, as well as graduate students interested in criminal law of foreign countries. The article can be used by teachers of law schools as an addition to the educational material.