Suchergebnisse

In this edition of scientific journal Problems of Psychology in the 21st Century scientific research is viewed from the perspective of the complexity of its nature and difficulty of its realization. It is no surprise that nowadays psychology goes through the process of its intensive development that results in the appearance of numerous researches in this sphere. However, the question is how novel or scientifically approved the research should be or how much empirical data has it to contain to be claimed scientifically relevant or interesting. It is not simply the issue of cohesion or scientific grammar that is based on a clear understanding of an algorithm of the whole researching activity when the hypothesis is to be formulated. It is unquestioned as scientific research usually means theory, practice, research question and personal experience. It is even not about the structure of any qualitative research as it in most cases contains general overview and research question that is masterly organized in introduction, discussion of literature or the section of topic discourse. It rather means the necessity to dispute the methodological aspects of any scientific work that is a research design and methods that help gather data and analyse it, proving the trustworthiness of the study. However, methodology and set of scientific methods used in the research are to be viewed as two different notions.

The article discusses the research methodology of Uzbek language syntax and its problems. Linguistics is inextricably linked with sciences such as philosophy, logic, and political science, and the relationship between language and thought has been one of the main issues of both linguistics and philosophy. Even when language and thought are taken separately, they become the object of study of linguistics and philosophy. Thinking and ideology are interdependent phenomena that require each other. This is also based on the fact that their terms are etymologically related. When it comes to the commonality of language and thought, their interconnectedness requires that they be in contact with the concept of ideology at the same time.

AbstractTraditionally, rural scholarship has been limited in its methodological approach. This has begun to change in recent years as rural researchers have embraced a range of different methodological tools. The aim of this article is to contribute to greater methodological pluralism in rural sociology by introducing readers to a method of research that is rarely engaged in the field, that is, Q methodology. The article describes the defining features of the approach as well as providing examples of its application to argue that it is a method that offers particular opportunities and synergies for rural social science research.