Suchergebnisse

Under conditions of open economy the Stability of the banking system of states operating under conditions of open economy them, including Lithuania, mostly depends on the condition of world economy and the state of fi­nancial markets. Therefore financial crises and their effect on the economies of countries and, stability of the fi­nancial sector are analyzed by scientists in different countries. In scientific researches analyzing on banking crises the crisis of the banking system in Sweden in the beginning of 1991 was at the time then an extraordinary phenomenon, as over time the Swedish banking system was considered stable and able to handle any crisis, and this forced the government of the country to undertake large scale operations to rescue the financial system of the country. The analysis of the reasons of the Swedish bank crisis reveals that bank regulation procedures and regulations rules to be used during a crisis have to be legalized. It is too risky to rely on quick decisions and measures adopted taken during a crisis and quick instruments as was the case in 1991 during the crisis in Sweden. Moreover, it is necessary to find Methods to reduce the tension between the bank creditors and its owners have to be found and help them find common solutions. The fact that the measures used to tackle the bank crisis in Sweden were effective and that the crisis management of crisis is presented as exemplary in scientific literature shows that during this crisis suitable. [to full text]

Under conditions of open economy the Stability of the banking system of states operating under conditions of open economy them, including Lithuania, mostly depends on the condition of world economy and the state of fi­nancial markets. Therefore financial crises and their effect on the economies of countries and, stability of the fi­nancial sector are analyzed by scientists in different countries. In scientific researches analyzing on banking crises the crisis of the banking system in Sweden in the beginning of 1991 was at the time then an extraordinary phenomenon, as over time the Swedish banking system was considered stable and able to handle any crisis, and this forced the government of the country to undertake large scale operations to rescue the financial system of the country. The analysis of the reasons of the Swedish bank crisis reveals that bank regulation procedures and regulations rules to be used during a crisis have to be legalized. It is too risky to rely on quick decisions and measures adopted taken during a crisis and quick instruments as was the case in 1991 during the crisis in Sweden. Moreover, it is necessary to find Methods to reduce the tension between the bank creditors and its owners have to be found and help them find common solutions. The fact that the measures used to tackle the bank crisis in Sweden were effective and that the crisis management of crisis is presented as exemplary in scientific literature shows that during this crisis suitable. [to full text]

Under conditions of open economy the Stability of the banking system of states operating under conditions of open economy them, including Lithuania, mostly depends on the condition of world economy and the state of fi­nancial markets. Therefore financial crises and their effect on the economies of countries and, stability of the fi­nancial sector are analyzed by scientists in different countries. In scientific researches analyzing on banking crises the crisis of the banking system in Sweden in the beginning of 1991 was at the time then an extraordinary phenomenon, as over time the Swedish banking system was considered stable and able to handle any crisis, and this forced the government of the country to undertake large scale operations to rescue the financial system of the country. The analysis of the reasons of the Swedish bank crisis reveals that bank regulation procedures and regulations rules to be used during a crisis have to be legalized. It is too risky to rely on quick decisions and measures adopted taken during a crisis and quick instruments as was the case in 1991 during the crisis in Sweden. Moreover, it is necessary to find Methods to reduce the tension between the bank creditors and its owners have to be found and help them find common solutions. The fact that the measures used to tackle the bank crisis in Sweden were effective and that the crisis management of crisis is presented as exemplary in scientific literature shows that during this crisis suitable. [to full text]

Under conditions of open economy the Stability of the banking system of states operating under conditions of open economy them, including Lithuania, mostly depends on the condition of world economy and the state of fi­nancial markets. Therefore financial crises and their effect on the economies of countries and, stability of the fi­nancial sector are analyzed by scientists in different countries. In scientific researches analyzing on banking crises the crisis of the banking system in Sweden in the beginning of 1991 was at the time then an extraordinary phenomenon, as over time the Swedish banking system was considered stable and able to handle any crisis, and this forced the government of the country to undertake large scale operations to rescue the financial system of the country. The analysis of the reasons of the Swedish bank crisis reveals that bank regulation procedures and regulations rules to be used during a crisis have to be legalized. It is too risky to rely on quick decisions and measures adopted taken during a crisis and quick instruments as was the case in 1991 during the crisis in Sweden. Moreover, it is necessary to find Methods to reduce the tension between the bank creditors and its owners have to be found and help them find common solutions. The fact that the measures used to tackle the bank crisis in Sweden were effective and that the crisis management of crisis is presented as exemplary in scientific literature shows that during this crisis suitable. [to full text]

The twentieth century is an era of pervasive turmoil. There were two cataclysmic full-scale wars and many wars and conflicts of lesser importance in all parts of the world. The term crisis is among the most widely used verbal symbols of turmoil in politics among nations. Scholars and journalists, too, often write about such things as incidents, disputes, riots, and rebellions etc. as crisis. In short, crisis is a pervasive term to describe dis ruption and disorder in the global arena. Many political scientists have been researching this phenomenon of international system but there is still a need for new researches and analysis of crisis in world politics. New technological tools and data-sets enable further development of analytical aspects of crisis theory: eruption of conflictual situations, context and reasons of crisis escalation and de-escalation, decision making process etc. The main reason impelled to write this article is the lack of integral theory on crisis issues. That is why the main objective of this study is to make a quantitative and comparative research of the crisis in the 20th century in order to highlight the main influential factors of this process in different time and space dimensions. A quantitative and comparative analysis in this article was performed using International Crisis Behavior (ICB) data-set of international crisis (by the SPSS 12.0 package). The results of the research confirm the presumption that the analysis of different "levels" provides different outcomes.[.].

The twentieth century is an era of pervasive turmoil. There were two cataclysmic full-scale wars and many wars and conflicts of lesser importance in all parts of the world. The term crisis is among the most widely used verbal symbols of turmoil in politics among nations. Scholars and journalists, too, often write about such things as incidents, disputes, riots, and rebellions etc. as crisis. In short, crisis is a pervasive term to describe dis ruption and disorder in the global arena. Many political scientists have been researching this phenomenon of international system but there is still a need for new researches and analysis of crisis in world politics. New technological tools and data-sets enable further development of analytical aspects of crisis theory: eruption of conflictual situations, context and reasons of crisis escalation and de-escalation, decision making process etc. The main reason impelled to write this article is the lack of integral theory on crisis issues. That is why the main objective of this study is to make a quantitative and comparative research of the crisis in the 20th century in order to highlight the main influential factors of this process in different time and space dimensions. A quantitative and comparative analysis in this article was performed using International Crisis Behavior (ICB) data-set of international crisis (by the SPSS 12.0 package). The results of the research confirm the presumption that the analysis of different "levels" provides different outcomes.[.].

The twentieth century is an era of pervasive turmoil. There were two cataclysmic full-scale wars and many wars and conflicts of lesser importance in all parts of the world. The term crisis is among the most widely used verbal symbols of turmoil in politics among nations. Scholars and journalists, too, often write about such things as incidents, disputes, riots, and rebellions etc. as crisis. In short, crisis is a pervasive term to describe dis ruption and disorder in the global arena. Many political scientists have been researching this phenomenon of international system but there is still a need for new researches and analysis of crisis in world politics. New technological tools and data-sets enable further development of analytical aspects of crisis theory: eruption of conflictual situations, context and reasons of crisis escalation and de-escalation, decision making process etc. The main reason impelled to write this article is the lack of integral theory on crisis issues. That is why the main objective of this study is to make a quantitative and comparative research of the crisis in the 20th century in order to highlight the main influential factors of this process in different time and space dimensions. A quantitative and comparative analysis in this article was performed using International Crisis Behavior (ICB) data-set of international crisis (by the SPSS 12.0 package). The results of the research confirm the presumption that the analysis of different "levels" provides different outcomes.[.].

The issue of mass migration to the European Union, although it has been present in the public space for several years, is still topical. Following the population movements in Europe and the massive influx of migrants from the Middle East to the borders of the European Union, the accumulation of which occurred in 2015, a number of phenomena related to the so-called migration crisis have been subject to research analysis. The aim of the considerations undertaken in this case study is to present the way in which Poland's position towards the EU's proposals for solving the migration crisis has evolved. A content analysis of the literature on the subject and the legal acts provided an answer to the question of how Poland's attitude changed after the 2015 parliamentary elections. And what factors underpinned the change of approach regarding the reception of refugees. This study uses mainly theoretical research methods such as analysis, which includes content analysis of the literature and available documents, and statistical studies on the research phenomenon. The analysis of the problem leads to the reflection that the proposal for a solution to the EU migration crisis has divided both the European Community and many other countries. In the face of a crisis, solidarity with the community and responsibility for the security of citizens were at stake. In 2015, this issue aroused a lot of emotion during the ongoing political campaign in Poland and was part of the electoral game. The victorious party and the new government have unequivocally rejected the idea of relocation, confirming that security is their overriding priority.

This article aims to make an insight into the conditions of immigration policy and actions undertaken by the Swedish authorities and political parties in the face of the migration crisis in Europe after 2015. A hypothesis presented here assumes that a decisive evolution of the attitudes of the Swedish authorities, political parties, and society towards a restrictive
approach to immigration arose from the awareness of the negative consequences of migration management for the Swedish socio-economic model and the political scene. The theoretical framework used in this article is the concept of policy responsiveness, including the ability of
political authorities to respond effectively and lawfully to the needs and expectations of the citizens. Process tracing was applied as a research method useful for following the transformation process Sweden's immigration policy. Statistical data, documents issued by the government and political parties, as well as the subject literature were the sources
utilised in the research. Conclusions drawn from the research point to the tightening of immigration policy as a result of the fear of a prolonged pull effect on foreigners and concern surrounding the appropriate handling of immigration in full accordance with the adopted model of immigration policy.

The beginning of the Ukraine crisis, in sense of international relations a kind of symbolyses the relatively peaceful period between the United States and Russia,which had started with the collapse of the Berlin Wall in 1989. It also highlights the importance of the crisis in Ukraine as a new, but the resurgent US and Russia competition as the two actors of international relations in the context of tension in international relations. Eastern and Central European region find themselves zoomed with Kremlin aggression in potential point. Among other things, the two biggest emerging international relations of participants in US-Russian struggle for power, raises fears of another international conflict threat. An important role attributable Eastern European region, especially in the Baltic countries, which are being formed for the new situation in international relations, kylančiuos Russian threat, finds himself elevated insecurity grėsmėje. Therefore, these arguments imply justification of the suitability of this study and further analysis. The work goal – is to find out what foreign policy and strategies of the United States is trying to influence Russia and its destabilizing policies in eastern Ukraine. Work tasks: 1.To present the theoretical foundations for the classical realism 2. To reveal the roots of the main triggers of the crisis in Ukraine and the influencing factors of the US and Russian interests in this crisis. 3. To analyze 2015 - US National Security Strategy and the US Supreme political leaders official positions on Russia's actions in Ukraine. 4. To analyze the US-Russian political relations between the Ukrainian crisis and provide essential analysis of US action on Russia's actions in the process of Ukraine crisis US action policies on Russia's actions in the context of the crisis in Ukraine is analyzed by combining several research methods: the official languages of the analysis of the event data set and applying descriptive and comparative methods. The paper concludes that the US-Russian relationship Ukraine crisis characterized by classical realism theory of consolidation. The fundamental basis of the work - the US action analysis of Russian aggression in the context of the crisis in Ukraine, confirmed active, coherent action program, although the National Security Strategy of the United States for more considering action policy programs. US actions on Russian aggression in Ukraine based on the economic, political and diplomatic spheres analysis showed that most US policy actions organized by the reaction principle of the case, nor the steering base.

The beginning of the Ukraine crisis, in sense of international relations a kind of symbolyses the relatively peaceful period between the United States and Russia,which had started with the collapse of the Berlin Wall in 1989. It also highlights the importance of the crisis in Ukraine as a new, but the resurgent US and Russia competition as the two actors of international relations in the context of tension in international relations. Eastern and Central European region find themselves zoomed with Kremlin aggression in potential point. Among other things, the two biggest emerging international relations of participants in US-Russian struggle for power, raises fears of another international conflict threat. An important role attributable Eastern European region, especially in the Baltic countries, which are being formed for the new situation in international relations, kylančiuos Russian threat, finds himself elevated insecurity grėsmėje. Therefore, these arguments imply justification of the suitability of this study and further analysis. The work goal – is to find out what foreign policy and strategies of the United States is trying to influence Russia and its destabilizing policies in eastern Ukraine. Work tasks: 1.To present the theoretical foundations for the classical realism 2. To reveal the roots of the main triggers of the crisis in Ukraine and the influencing factors of the US and Russian interests in this crisis. 3. To analyze 2015 - US National Security Strategy and the US Supreme political leaders official positions on Russia's actions in Ukraine. 4. To analyze the US-Russian political relations between the Ukrainian crisis and provide essential analysis of US action on Russia's actions in the process of Ukraine crisis US action policies on Russia's actions in the context of the crisis in Ukraine is analyzed by combining several research methods: the official languages of the analysis of the event data set and applying descriptive and comparative methods. The paper concludes that the US-Russian relationship Ukraine crisis characterized by classical realism theory of consolidation. The fundamental basis of the work - the US action analysis of Russian aggression in the context of the crisis in Ukraine, confirmed active, coherent action program, although the National Security Strategy of the United States for more considering action policy programs. US actions on Russian aggression in Ukraine based on the economic, political and diplomatic spheres analysis showed that most US policy actions organized by the reaction principle of the case, nor the steering base.

The beginning of the Ukraine crisis, in sense of international relations a kind of symbolyses the relatively peaceful period between the United States and Russia,which had started with the collapse of the Berlin Wall in 1989. It also highlights the importance of the crisis in Ukraine as a new, but the resurgent US and Russia competition as the two actors of international relations in the context of tension in international relations. Eastern and Central European region find themselves zoomed with Kremlin aggression in potential point. Among other things, the two biggest emerging international relations of participants in US-Russian struggle for power, raises fears of another international conflict threat. An important role attributable Eastern European region, especially in the Baltic countries, which are being formed for the new situation in international relations, kylančiuos Russian threat, finds himself elevated insecurity grėsmėje. Therefore, these arguments imply justification of the suitability of this study and further analysis. The work goal – is to find out what foreign policy and strategies of the United States is trying to influence Russia and its destabilizing policies in eastern Ukraine. Work tasks: 1.To present the theoretical foundations for the classical realism 2. To reveal the roots of the main triggers of the crisis in Ukraine and the influencing factors of the US and Russian interests in this crisis. 3. To analyze 2015 - US National Security Strategy and the US Supreme political leaders official positions on Russia's actions in Ukraine. 4. To analyze the US-Russian political relations between the Ukrainian crisis and provide essential analysis of US action on Russia's actions in the process of Ukraine crisis US action policies on Russia's actions in the context of the crisis in Ukraine is analyzed by combining several research methods: the official languages of the analysis of the event data set and applying descriptive and comparative methods. The paper concludes that the US-Russian relationship Ukraine crisis characterized by classical realism theory of consolidation. The fundamental basis of the work - the US action analysis of Russian aggression in the context of the crisis in Ukraine, confirmed active, coherent action program, although the National Security Strategy of the United States for more considering action policy programs. US actions on Russian aggression in Ukraine based on the economic, political and diplomatic spheres analysis showed that most US policy actions organized by the reaction principle of the case, nor the steering base.

Pakistan and Afghanistan share border – Durand Line, it remains the most dangerous portion of both countries international borders. Kabul has never recognized the line as an international border, instead claiming that Pashtun territories in Pakistan that comprise the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) and parts of North West Frontier Province along the border, were illegally separated from Afghanistan. The Afghan government insists Pakistan increase security and stop incursions by Taliban insurgents into country. As the tribal lands continue to serve as a training base for terrorists and the Taliban, deploying Pakistani troops into the region has harmed efforts to integrate the tribal areas into Pakistan. The wave of militant violence have increased on both sides of the Pakistan-Afghanistan border since 2001, when a US-led military coalition invaded Afghanistan and the Taliban regime collapsed. In the last several years, United States intelligence reports have repeatedly attributed the growing strength and resurgence of Taliban and al- Qaeda to safe havens in this border region. There is growing consensus in Washington and NATO headquarters that to win the war in Afghanistan, it had to address the chaos in Pakistan's tribal areas. Pakistan's civilian politicians are not strong enough to accept U.S. demands if it means contradicting the army's policies. Pakistan's premier intelligence service, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), has been accused of arming, training, and providing logistical support to militants in Kashmir and Afghanistan. Pakistan denies any ongoing collaboration between the ISI and militants, stressing a change of course after September 11, 2001.[.].

Pakistan and Afghanistan share border – Durand Line, it remains the most dangerous portion of both countries international borders. Kabul has never recognized the line as an international border, instead claiming that Pashtun territories in Pakistan that comprise the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) and parts of North West Frontier Province along the border, were illegally separated from Afghanistan. The Afghan government insists Pakistan increase security and stop incursions by Taliban insurgents into country. As the tribal lands continue to serve as a training base for terrorists and the Taliban, deploying Pakistani troops into the region has harmed efforts to integrate the tribal areas into Pakistan. The wave of militant violence have increased on both sides of the Pakistan-Afghanistan border since 2001, when a US-led military coalition invaded Afghanistan and the Taliban regime collapsed. In the last several years, United States intelligence reports have repeatedly attributed the growing strength and resurgence of Taliban and al- Qaeda to safe havens in this border region. There is growing consensus in Washington and NATO headquarters that to win the war in Afghanistan, it had to address the chaos in Pakistan's tribal areas. Pakistan's civilian politicians are not strong enough to accept U.S. demands if it means contradicting the army's policies. Pakistan's premier intelligence service, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), has been accused of arming, training, and providing logistical support to militants in Kashmir and Afghanistan. Pakistan denies any ongoing collaboration between the ISI and militants, stressing a change of course after September 11, 2001.[.].

Pakistan and Afghanistan share border – Durand Line, it remains the most dangerous portion of both countries international borders. Kabul has never recognized the line as an international border, instead claiming that Pashtun territories in Pakistan that comprise the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) and parts of North West Frontier Province along the border, were illegally separated from Afghanistan. The Afghan government insists Pakistan increase security and stop incursions by Taliban insurgents into country. As the tribal lands continue to serve as a training base for terrorists and the Taliban, deploying Pakistani troops into the region has harmed efforts to integrate the tribal areas into Pakistan. The wave of militant violence have increased on both sides of the Pakistan-Afghanistan border since 2001, when a US-led military coalition invaded Afghanistan and the Taliban regime collapsed. In the last several years, United States intelligence reports have repeatedly attributed the growing strength and resurgence of Taliban and al- Qaeda to safe havens in this border region. There is growing consensus in Washington and NATO headquarters that to win the war in Afghanistan, it had to address the chaos in Pakistan's tribal areas. Pakistan's civilian politicians are not strong enough to accept U.S. demands if it means contradicting the army's policies. Pakistan's premier intelligence service, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), has been accused of arming, training, and providing logistical support to militants in Kashmir and Afghanistan. Pakistan denies any ongoing collaboration between the ISI and militants, stressing a change of course after September 11, 2001.[.].