Suchergebnisse

The article deals with the states sovereignty and national culture reticence problematisation in the process of globalisation. An erosion of the trust on state institutions supposed deconstruction of the national history narratives. The formality of lacunas and fables of the official history and culture conflicted with the world openness and variety and fragmented unified state politics discourse in the social and cultural communitas (V. Turner). The compementarity its relations by dialog are served as a selection machine between its state history and culture of society. The culture of oblivion become the tool for the nation totality reinterpretation, reservation and the cultural memory preservation. Commemoration of the codes, archtypes and constructs of the historical identity in the social, political and ethnical history of Lithuania became condition sine qua non for the legitimation of the discourse of "commonness culture" in modern civilisation.

The article deals with the states sovereignty and national culture reticence problematisation in the process of globalisation. An erosion of the trust on state institutions supposed deconstruction of the national history narratives. The formality of lacunas and fables of the official history and culture conflicted with the world openness and variety and fragmented unified state politics discourse in the social and cultural communitas (V. Turner). The compementarity its relations by dialog are served as a selection machine between its state history and culture of society. The culture of oblivion become the tool for the nation totality reinterpretation, reservation and the cultural memory preservation. Commemoration of the codes, archtypes and constructs of the historical identity in the social, political and ethnical history of Lithuania became condition sine qua non for the legitimation of the discourse of "commonness culture" in modern civilisation.

The article deals with the states sovereignty and national culture reticence problematisation in the process of globalisation. An erosion of the trust on state institutions supposed deconstruction of the national history narratives. The formality of lacunas and fables of the official history and culture conflicted with the world openness and variety and fragmented unified state politics discourse in the social and cultural communitas (V. Turner). The compementarity its relations by dialog are served as a selection machine between its state history and culture of society. The culture of oblivion become the tool for the nation totality reinterpretation, reservation and the cultural memory preservation. Commemoration of the codes, archtypes and constructs of the historical identity in the social, political and ethnical history of Lithuania became condition sine qua non for the legitimation of the discourse of "commonness culture" in modern civilisation.

The article deals with the states sovereignty and national culture reticence problematisation in the process of globalisation. An erosion of the trust on state institutions supposed deconstruction of the national history narratives. The formality of lacunas and fables of the official history and culture conflicted with the world openness and variety and fragmented unified state politics discourse in the social and cultural communitas (V. Turner). The compementarity its relations by dialog are served as a selection machine between its state history and culture of society. The culture of oblivion become the tool for the nation totality reinterpretation, reservation and the cultural memory preservation. Commemoration of the codes, archtypes and constructs of the historical identity in the social, political and ethnical history of Lithuania became condition sine qua non for the legitimation of the discourse of "commonness culture" in modern civilisation.

The governmental promotion of culture philanthropy as a significant issue in culture policy is widely discussed in scientific literature. Many authors (Sulek 2010, Payton, 2000, etc.) argue that, though philanthropy concept has antique origins, at present still there is no comprehensive perception of its full meaning and no well-thought-out definition exists, thus, it is not astonishing that understanding of philanthropy is pretty much embedded in social, cultural and political settings. Culture philanthropy process involves different philanthropy actors – donors, intermediaries and recipients. The paper aims to discuss theoretical and practical aspects of culture philanthropy, using three differents approaches – perceptions by all three groups of actors in culture philanthropy. The paper analyses the concept of philanthropy as well as perceptions of culture policy in Lithuania. Data analysis is dwelling on the findings of the qualitative research conducted in 2014 on culture philanthropy actors' perceptions and experiences.

The governmental promotion of culture philanthropy as a significant issue in culture policy is widely discussed in scientific literature. Many authors (Sulek 2010, Payton, 2000, etc.) argue that, though philanthropy concept has antique origins, at present still there is no comprehensive perception of its full meaning and no well-thought-out definition exists, thus, it is not astonishing that understanding of philanthropy is pretty much embedded in social, cultural and political settings. Culture philanthropy process involves different philanthropy actors – donors, intermediaries and recipients. The paper aims to discuss theoretical and practical aspects of culture philanthropy, using three differents approaches – perceptions by all three groups of actors in culture philanthropy. The paper analyses the concept of philanthropy as well as perceptions of culture policy in Lithuania. Data analysis is dwelling on the findings of the qualitative research conducted in 2014 on culture philanthropy actors' perceptions and experiences.

The governmental promotion of culture philanthropy as a significant issue in culture policy is widely discussed in scientific literature. Many authors (Sulek 2010, Payton, 2000, etc.) argue that, though philanthropy concept has antique origins, at present still there is no comprehensive perception of its full meaning and no well-thought-out definition exists, thus, it is not astonishing that understanding of philanthropy is pretty much embedded in social, cultural and political settings. Culture philanthropy process involves different philanthropy actors – donors, intermediaries and recipients. The paper aims to discuss theoretical and practical aspects of culture philanthropy, using three differents approaches – perceptions by all three groups of actors in culture philanthropy. The paper analyses the concept of philanthropy as well as perceptions of culture policy in Lithuania. Data analysis is dwelling on the findings of the qualitative research conducted in 2014 on culture philanthropy actors' perceptions and experiences.

The governmental promotion of culture philanthropy as a significant issue in culture policy is widely discussed in scientific literature. Many authors (Sulek 2010, Payton, 2000, etc.) argue that, though philanthropy concept has antique origins, at present still there is no comprehensive perception of its full meaning and no well-thought-out definition exists, thus, it is not astonishing that understanding of philanthropy is pretty much embedded in social, cultural and political settings. Culture philanthropy process involves different philanthropy actors – donors, intermediaries and recipients. The paper aims to discuss theoretical and practical aspects of culture philanthropy, using three differents approaches – perceptions by all three groups of actors in culture philanthropy. The paper analyses the concept of philanthropy as well as perceptions of culture policy in Lithuania. Data analysis is dwelling on the findings of the qualitative research conducted in 2014 on culture philanthropy actors' perceptions and experiences.

This article is a short introduction to how interdisciplinary theoretical perspectives can be developed for analyzing the phenomenon of national mobilization. The successful mass mobilization in Lithuania demonstrantes that Soviet mental programming was not successful in changing, using Rorty's terminology, the most parochial terms in the final vocabularies of Lithuanians. National identity was preserved during the period of occupation, and provided the grounds for collective action. The success of mobilization (in the "noisy phase") was closely connected with national values that were preserved during the period of Soviet occupation (the "quiet phase"), using various unobtrusive practices of contention in the context of bureaucratic nationalism, when state institutions in Lithuania were employing people who were nationally conscious. This, when a political opportunity emerged, allowed a rapid mass mobilization led by Sąjūdis.

This article is a short introduction to how interdisciplinary theoretical perspectives can be developed for analyzing the phenomenon of national mobilization. The successful mass mobilization in Lithuania demonstrantes that Soviet mental programming was not successful in changing, using Rorty's terminology, the most parochial terms in the final vocabularies of Lithuanians. National identity was preserved during the period of occupation, and provided the grounds for collective action. The success of mobilization (in the "noisy phase") was closely connected with national values that were preserved during the period of Soviet occupation (the "quiet phase"), using various unobtrusive practices of contention in the context of bureaucratic nationalism, when state institutions in Lithuania were employing people who were nationally conscious. This, when a political opportunity emerged, allowed a rapid mass mobilization led by Sąjūdis.

This article is a short introduction to how interdisciplinary theoretical perspectives can be developed for analyzing the phenomenon of national mobilization. The successful mass mobilization in Lithuania demonstrantes that Soviet mental programming was not successful in changing, using Rorty's terminology, the most parochial terms in the final vocabularies of Lithuanians. National identity was preserved during the period of occupation, and provided the grounds for collective action. The success of mobilization (in the "noisy phase") was closely connected with national values that were preserved during the period of Soviet occupation (the "quiet phase"), using various unobtrusive practices of contention in the context of bureaucratic nationalism, when state institutions in Lithuania were employing people who were nationally conscious. This, when a political opportunity emerged, allowed a rapid mass mobilization led by Sąjūdis.