Boljsevizacija i ideologizacija hrvatske kulture i umjetnosti (1948.)
In: Časopis za suvremenu povijest: Journal of contemporary history, Band 26, Heft 1, S. 47-63
ISSN: 0590-9597
589 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Časopis za suvremenu povijest: Journal of contemporary history, Band 26, Heft 1, S. 47-63
ISSN: 0590-9597
World Affairs Online
In: Mežregionalʹnye issledovanija v obščestvennych naukach
In: Serija monografii 11
In: Avhandlingar från Historiska Institutionen i Göteborg 34
In: Politička misao, Band 42, Heft 1, S. 9-36
World Affairs Online
In: Biblioteka Studije
In: University of Southern Denmark studies in history and social sciences 425
In: Biblioteka Jazon 13
In: Politička misao, Band 35, Heft 1, S. 119-137
Defining the dimensions of political culture is a precondition in the elaboration of the theory of this phenomenon and for its systematic empirical study. It has been demonstrated that Almond-Verba's concept of the dimensions of political culture, in the form of a matrix of the three orientations (cognitive, affective, and evaluative) times four political objects ("system", "input-objects", "output-objects" and "I" as an object) is not plausible. If political culture is defined as a set of beliefs about polit (which it indeed is), then it is clear that each belief at the same time contains an intricate mix of knowledge, emotions, and evaluations. This makes it difficult to determine the dimensions according to the mentioned orientations. It seems this was sensed by Almond himself in one of his later works. Using his more recent concept, we define the dimensions of political culture according to the "objects" of politics and not vice versa, according to the orientations in relation to these "objects". Thus we have elaborated on the three fundamental dimensions according to the three fundamental objects of politics: the "system" as a universal object, the "process" as a dynamic object of politics, and the "conduct" as a manner of decision-making and the outcome of governing. It has been found that each of these basic dimensions of political culture has a series of subdimensions (a total of about twenty-five). Surely, this matrix may be added to or perhaps amended, but basically it is unassailable, since it represents a sort of a map of political culture. (SOI : PM: S. 137)
World Affairs Online
In: Politička misao, Band 34, Heft 4, S. 109-128
The essay describes the evolution of the concept of political culture, from th concepts such as Comte's 'consensus', Durkheim's 'collective awareness', Weber's 'significance of individual actions', to Parson's 'action frame of reference', and Mead's 'national character'. The development began with Comte's search for differentia specifica of social sciences in relation to oth positive sciences and finished in 1963 with the introduction of the concept of political culture into political science by G. Mmond and S. Verba. Our analysis has shown that many definitions of political culture point out that i essence lies in people's beliefs since political culture is a set of beliefs regarding politics. As much as it may seem a paradox, it cannot be reduced to mere individual beliefs, but represents a system of inter-subjective opinions on various political objects. This explains the possible discrepancies between the political events and the political beliefs of the people, between their behaviour and political culture, and so on. Contrary to the belief of some authors, it has been shown how political culture may and should be taken as a common denominator for a variety of opinions on politics. Political attitudes, values, norms, public opinion and political ideologies are nothing but different manifestations of political culture. Thus, the concept of political culture includes diverse facets of the subjective attitude of people towards politics. This is the asset and not the downside of this concept, as some authors would have it. It is pointed out that the manifold manifestations of political culture do not carry the same 'weight' in explaining the political activism of people and the functioning of political systems. The relationship between these manifestations is extremely complex and a challenge for research. It is this very relationship that could explain the stable and less stable (i.e. stable and vacillating) reactions of people in their political activity. (SOI : PM: S. 128)
World Affairs Online
In: Jezik kao zapis kulture u etnološkoǰ i lingvističkoǰ analizi na ralaciǰi Srbiǰa - Makedoniǰa Tom 1
In: Tekin Nümismatik Kültür yayınları 1