Dialectics
In: Soviet review: a journal of translations, Band 4, S. 45-51
ISSN: 0038-5794
2175 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Soviet review: a journal of translations, Band 4, S. 45-51
ISSN: 0038-5794
In: Historical materialism: research in critical marxist theory, Band 13, Heft 1, S. 241-266
ISSN: 1569-206X
In: Administrative science quarterly: ASQ ; dedicated to advancing the understanding of administration through empirical investigation and theoretical analysis, Band 25, Heft 1, S. 72-88
ISSN: 0001-8392
In: International socialism: journal for socialist theory/ Socialist Workers Party, Heft 141, S. 97-118
ISSN: 0020-8736
In: Dialectical anthropology: an independent international journal in the critical tradition committed to the transformation of our society and the humane union of theory and practice, Band 4, Heft 4, S. 289-308
ISSN: 1573-0786
In: Journal for the study of radicalism, Band 17, Heft 2, S. 83-109
ISSN: 1930-1197
In: Journal of civil and human rights, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 92-95
ISSN: 2378-4253
In: Small axe: a journal of criticism, Band 24, Heft 3, S. 228-238
ISSN: 1534-6714
Rounding out a discussion of Moving Against the System: The 1968 Congress of Black Writers and the Making of Global Consciousness, the author engages in a dialogue with his respondents about the significance of the congress. This essay assesses the legacy of the 1968 congress as a manifestation of the black radical tradition and a critical involvement with socialism. Drawing on C. L. R. James and Sylvia Wynter, it argues that black freedom struggles in the Americas and Europe, including slave revolts, have been an essential part of the history of labor and freedom struggles. It also contends that race has been overdetermined in ways that have historically understated the centrality of black labor to the emergence of modern capitalism, to anticapitalist struggle, and to the movement for universal freedom and a more broadly defined socialism. The essay concludes by asserting that black radical politics pose a challenge to the color- and colonial-blindness of the conventional Left while at the same time reimaging what freedom can mean in the present.
In: Critique: journal of socialist theory, Band 39, Heft 1, S. 155-172
ISSN: 1748-8605
In: Critique: journal of socialist theory, Band 39, Heft 1, S. 155-173
ISSN: 0301-7605
In: Philosophy of the social sciences: an international journal = Philosophie des sciences sociales, Band 13, Heft 1, S. 55-62
ISSN: 1552-7441
In: Administrative Science Quarterly, Band 25, Heft 1, S. 72
In: The review of politics, Band 60, Heft 1, S. 5-30
ISSN: 0034-6705
In: The review of politics, Band 60, Heft 1, S. 5-30
ISSN: 1748-6858
In the modern, extant world of practical history, the dominant "democratic" tradition splits sharply into three, often hostile strands. These strands are liberal democracy, social revolutionary democracy, and participatory democracy. Especially for analytical purposes, it is important to see these strands as distinct sharing only the vaguest general commitment to government by and for broad reaches of the population (thedemos). However, the three strands, for all their differences—and hostilities—should be seen historically as standing in profound and significantdialecticalrelationship with each other. In this light, liberal and social revolutionary democracy are opposites in an antithetical tension that is increasingly extreme. Participatory democracy will then appear as a third term, a still emerging synthetical response arising out of attempts to resolve the tension between the two earlier democratic variants, and clearly showing marks of its inheritance from them.