Suchergebnisse

Mainstream leadership studies tend to privilege and separate leaders from followers. This article highlights the value of rethinking leadership as a set of dialectical relationships. Drawing on post-structuralist perspectives, this approach reconsiders the relations and practices of leaders and followers as mutually constituting and co-produced. It also highlights the tensions, contradictions and ambiguities that typically characterize these shifting asymmetrical and interdependent leadership dynamics. Exploring three interrelated 'dialectics' (control/resistance, dissent/consent and men/women), the article raises a number of issues frequently neglected in the mainstream literature. It emphasizes that leaders exercise considerable power, that their control is often shifting, paradoxical and contradictory, that followers' practices are frequently proactive, knowledgeable and oppositional, that gender crucially shapes control/resistance/consent dialectics and that leaders themselves may engage in workplace dissent. The article concludes that dialectical perspectives can provide new and innovative ways of understanding leadership.

Considering Pragma-Dialectics honors the monumental contributions of one of the foremost international figures in current argumentation scholarship: Frans van Eemeren. The volume presents the research efforts of his colleagues and addresses how their work relates to the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation with which van Eemeren's name is so intimately connected. This tribute serves to highlight the varied approaches to the study of argumentation and is destined to inspire researchers to advance scholarship in the field far into the future. Replete with contributions from highly-esteemed

AbstractThis article first provides an overview and brief history of relational dialectics theory (RDT) before turning to a presentation of RDT's basic tenets and theoretical utility. In addition, it also examines how RDT has been applied in studying family contexts and offers suggestions for future directions of RDT‐based research.

Cover -- Table of contents -- Introduction: On Contemporary French Philosophy, Specters of Hegel, Dialectics, and Modernity -- Part 1: Specters of Totality -- Preliminary remarks -- Chapter 1: The Insufficient Totality -- Ecstasy Beyond Totality -- Ethics beyond Totality -- Chapter 2: The Impossible Totality -- Un-divine History -- Inhuman History -- Chapter 3: The Dangerous Totality -- Ideology and the Problem of Communism -- The Crisis of Meta-narratives and the Problem of Capitalism -- The Ethical Relation and the Problem of Politics -- Part 2: Specters of Rupture -- Preliminary remarks -- Chapter 1: Ruptures with Being -- Chapter 2: The Ruptured Subject and the Problem of the Other -- Chapter 3: Ruptured History. Toward Dispersion -- Part 3: Specters of Dispersion -- Preliminary remarks -- Chapter 1: The Differend as the Stakes of Thought -- Philosophy and Science -- Philosophy, Language, and Metalanguage -- Beyond Ethics and Politics: Philosophy as Art -- Chapter 2: Difference as Repetition -- Chapter 3: Deconstruction of différance -- Afterword: Post-dialectics and Postmodernity -- Main references

Reconsiders the place of dialectics in Marxist philosophy, drawing on a reading of the works of Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels. It is suggested that Marx & Engels built their theory on the foundation of Hegelian dialectics because (1) they were deeply immersed in the German tradition of viewing the material universe as the product of self-differentiation that takes place through stages of growth & decay, & (2) they steadfastly believed that reality revealed itself only in a distorted manner in the material world. By applying Hegelian dialectics to social analysis, Marx produced a scientific framework in which historical proof of the eventual death of capitalism & birth of socialism & communism might be collected. Engels employed Hegelian dialectics with the somewhat more grandiose intention of developing a global worldview wherein all layers of natural & social reality might be explained according to a singular principle & set of laws. In transforming a philosophical tradition into a set of laws, Marx & Engels ultimately delegitimized an entire current of Western thought, which can only be revived if it is restored to its place as a form of philosophical speculation. 24 References. D. Ryfe