Suchergebnisse

The topic of the book is the incremental growth of linguistic knowledge from lexical to structural-cum-textual during the so-called later language development. Language mastery does not presuppose any acquaintance with prescriptive grammar but, instead, concerns the core of language which the so-called consensus principle applies to: the most frequent words and structures are mastered with certainty by everybody, but uncertainty increases as less frequent and more variable phenomena are taken into consideration. It is the goal of the study to make explicit the knowledge that is common to school children of different age groups, and to show how it develops both in its core and in its fringe areas. The mastery of less common aspects exhibits considerable statistical variation. The research embodies methodological pluralism insofar as it has been carried out by means both of the corpus method and the experimental method. Here experimental subsumes writing tasks, paper-and-pencil tests, and behavior under experimental conditions. The amount of participants native in Finnish varies from 300–2000. The book has a bipartite structure: mastery of meanings (Part I), and mastery of forms (Part II).

Finnish Lapland is a historical borderland of Finnish and Sámi cultures. Such a region offers various social-political identifications for people to choose: people may see it possible to identify as Finnish, Laplanders, Lappish or Sámi, for instance. However, the choices have social and political limits, and some identifications are more contested than others. The book examines the processes of identifications in the middle parts of Lapland, just south of the region defined as Sámi homeland in Finland. While the study reveals differences and nuances in people's thinking, it also shows that there is a recognizable sense of shared cultural specifity around the region. Lapland is conceptualized as an extraordinary place with unusual nature and history, characterized by particular livelihoods (such as reindeer herding) and lively cultural interaction. The book concludes that while Lapland is extraordinary as a historical dwelling region of indigenous Sámi, it may be politically significant to recognize it as a unique borderland of cultures with features of its own.

The nineteenth century has been called an age of monuments. In some places even one piece made a difference. This book is a study of the intellectual background and physical making of Finland's first public sculpture, the statue of Professor Henrik Gabriel Porthan by Carl Eneas Sjöstrand. The idealised but sombre Porthan was born under the influence of German neoclassicism. Development on the project was slow but sure. The Swedish artist had to be supported over three years while he was putting together his first monumental piece in Munich and Rome, after which came another three years wait before the cast arrived to Finland. The bronze sculpture, commissioned by the Finnish Literary Society and raised by public subscriptions from people of all classes, was unveiled in the city of Turku in September 1864. Finns took some pride in the fact that, unlike other nations that had raised monuments to kings and generals, here the first place was given to a scholar. In this study Sjöstrand's pioneering bronze is placed in a wider context and compared with works by his precursors and contemporaries in the international sculptor colony of Rome.

Participatory approaches and co-research are increasingly employed in the current moment for exploring barriers to equality. Co-research treats research participants as experts in their own lives and as equal research partners. Research conducted with this orientation is based on research problems drafted by the research participants themselves from their aspirations regarding the research process and an active partnership that considers the interests of all parties involved. Participatory methods are used in co-research, particularly for the purpose of deepening the contextualisation of research knowledge about structurally vulnerable or subordinated groups and to challenge the power positions associated with traditional research designs. In co-research, the role of the people involved in the research is more central than in more traditional research. One of the key principles of co-research is that co-investigators (a) can participate in various roles, (b) have the opportunity to participate in different phases of the research according to their own interests and resources, and (c) co-investigators' participation can take many forms, including differences in intensity. The idea is to provide more people with opportunities to contribute to the knowledge production about themselves and their communities from their respective perspectives and interests. Co-research is also seen as an opportunity to improve the relevance and usefulness of scientific knowledge. It aims to genuinely increase interaction and openness and extend science's societal responsibility. In this book, we approach co-research as a means to promote social justice, as an action with a societal impact contributor to social impact and as a means to promote the societal responsibility of science. We discuss and evaluate the ideals of the co-research process concerning the everyday challenges and practices in research. Above all, we offer the knowledge and experience generated by our own projects to support those planning or already implementing co-research projects.

Marxismin mukaan kapitalistisen yhteiskunnan jäsenet jakaantuvat kolmeen luokkaan: porvaristoon, keskiluokkaan ja työväenluokkaan. Jotkut marxismin tukijat jakavat keskiluokan talonpojistoon ja muuhun keskiluokkaan. Talonpojisto on vähenevä luokka. Koska marxismin luokkateorian mukaan poliittiset puolueet vaalivat yhteiskuntaluokien intressejä, tutkin pitääkö tämä väite paikkansa. Ensin selvitin marxilaisen teorian luokista ja niiden intresseistä eli eduista, joiden puolustamiseski luokat järjestäytyvät poliittisiksi puolueiksi. Ne laativat itselleen yhteiskuntapoliittiset ohjelmansa, joita ne pyrkivät politiikansa avulla toteuttamaan. Tutkimusaineistona käytän Suomen eduskunnassa tutkimusvuosina edustettina olelleiden puolueiden tavoite- ja yleisohjelmia, joista selvitän sisällön analyysiä käyttäen niiden sisällön ja julkilausutut tavoitteet. Erityisesti pyrin selvittämään orientoituvatko puolueet ohjelmissaan tiettyjen luokkien etujen puolustajiksi vai missä määrin ne esiintyvät yhteiskunnan yleisten etujen vaalijoina. Tutkimus tapahtuu toisaalta puolueiden eduskuntoimintaa selvittämällä. Tällöin pyrin saamaan selville sen toimivatko puolueet periaate- ja tavoiteohjelmiensa mukaisesti laatiessaan lakialoitteita eduskunnassa. Kolmantena tutkimuskohteena on hallituksen esitysten sisällön eritteleminen intressiorientaation pojalta. Kysymys kuuluu palvelevatko hallituksen esitykset yleistä vai luokkien erityisetuja. Tutkimuksessa selvisi, että puolueet niin ohjelmalausumissaan kuin eduskuntatoiminnassaan vaalivat sekä yleistä etu, josta käytän nimitystä luokkien yhteisetu, että luokkien erityisetuja. Eniten puolueet vaalivat yhteisetua. Erityiseduista puolueet vaalivat kukin tiettyä luokkaetua enemmän kuin toista. Tämän perusteella puolueet jakaantuvat ensijaisesti porvariston, keskiluokan ja työväenluokanetuja vaaliviksi. Hallituksen esityksissä luokkaorientaatio on heikompaa kuin kansanedustajien lakialoitteissa. Tutkimustuloksistani selviää myös se, että vaikka puolueet ovat viime vuosikymmeninä ottaneet vaaliakseen aikaisempaa enemmän kaikkien luokkien intressejä ja niiden yleispuolueominaisuudet ovat lisääntyneet, tietty luokkaorientaatio on säilynyt. ; Classes continually alter and influence party strategies and also the behaviour of voters. The members of classes form economic, professional and political organisations. Every class aims to exert the greatest influence upon the state with the help of its political party. This study researches the class basis of political competition, the effect of class interests on the policies of nine Finnish parties in their political programmes and initiative work in the Parliament. The investigation is based on historical materialism and its class structure theory developed by Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels and other Marxists. The aim of study is to estimate how appropriate the class schema of historical materialism is for analysing the political partisanships and ideological conflicts in advanced industrial society. The statements and aims of political party programmes are put into practice in Parliament. This research analyses how parties represent their aims in their political programmes and what their parliamentarians do in Parliament. Is a party the representative of one class or does it equally promote the interests of many classes? Is it a class party or a generally oriented party? As in historical materialism, the programmes and legislative initiatives have been classified into five groups. The first group contains general class interest, oriented towards the common good. The next four groups comprise bills with a specific class interest orientation: bourgeoisie, the middle class, farmers and workers. The parties investigated are The National Coalition Party /The Conservative Party, The Swedish People`s Party, The Finnish Centre Party, The Finnish Social Democratic Party, The Left Alliance, The Liberals, The True Finns, The Christian Democratic Party and The Greens. The changes in politics and in party relationships over thirty years are investigated by comparing the parliamentary actions of parties from the 1960´s to the 1990´s. The study concerns the legislative initiatives of the years 1965, 1972, 1988 and 1999. The data on the programmes were collected from the two political programmes of nine parties from the years 1950 2003. The programmes of political parties are the public flag of the party as Engels expressed it, although their programmes have lost some of their class orientation. In the programmes of all nine political parties the contents aiming at the common good are the first, most important aim, the percentages being 76 98 %. Differences in the programmes of the political parties can still be found. The political parties emphasise their interests and aims in their own ways. The Conservative Party, The Swedish People´s Party and The Liberals have the next important interest in the bourgeoisie. The Swedish People´s Party, The Finnish Centre Party and The True Finns emphasise the middle class and the farmers. The Finnish Social Democratic Party, The Left Alliance and The Greens take care of working class. The main task of Parliament is to enact legislation. Bills can be submitted to Parliament by the Government or as private members bills. In this process the class interests notably emerge in private members bills of plenary sessions. The main Finnish political parties took into consideration the interests of all classes. All nine parties have made in the largest extent common good legislative initiatives. For all nine parties, the most prevalent type of legislative initiatives was those for the common good (84 -67 %). At the same time they tended to favour special class interests. The least specific class parties were The Christian Democratic Party, The Green Party and The Swedish People´s Party. Among special class interests all the parties oriented more to middle class interests in Parliament than in their declared objectives (18.8 7.0 %). The Liberals, The Conservative Party, The Social Democratic Party, The Left Alliance and The True Finns had the strongest middle class orientation. The Conservative Party were the most bourgeois party (10.2%). The strongest working class interest was found in The Left Alliance, The Social Democratic Party and The Green Party (18.8 13.1 %). The Finnish Centre Party and The Social Democratic party, The Left Alliance and The True Finns were closest to working class interests. Are there class oriented differences in the contents of the legislative initiatives and political programmes of the nine political parties? The contents were classified into eleven groups: administration, civil rights, nature conservation, economics, occupation structure, social policy, public health, education, culture, labour market and international affairs. All nine parties have the same three most important contents of legislative initiatives. These were finance/economics, social policy and administration systems. And all nine parties were more interested in financial and economic aims than their political manifestos suggest. The fourth important content for The Conservative Party, The Swedish People`s Party, The Liberals and The Christian Democratic Party was education. Employment was the fourth aim of The Finnish Centre Party and The True Finns. The Labour Market was also important to The Finnish Social Democratic Party, The Left Alliance and The Greens. Nature conservation was important to The Greens, too. The contents of government bills are more oriented towards the common good than are the private members bills. The conclusion is that the main Finnish political parties took the interests of all classes into consideration. At the same time they reveal preferences for special class interests. This emerges in political manifestos and legislative initiatives and government proposals. The Finnish political parties are not purely general parties devoid of class background. Finance and economics was the basis upon which the people arranged their lives and formed political opinions. The class structure of historical materialism is suitable to demonstrate political partisanship in Finland during the second half of the twentieth century. Social changes affect both the class structures and the political aims of parties and give rise to social and ideological conflicts in advanced industrial societies. The consensus policy is one appearance of civilized class struggle.

Tutkimuksen aiheena on kunta ja sen muutos. Tutkin sitä, minkälaisena kunta näyttäytyy sen tehtäväkenttää voimakkaasti rajaavan hallinnonuudistuksen kontekstissa, ja minkälaisia vaikutuksia tällaisella hallinnonuudistuksella on kuntiin. Tutkimuksen tavoitteena on lisätä ymmärrystä siitä, miten moniulotteisesta ja laajavaikutteisesta muutoksesta kunnan tehtäviä vähentävässä hallinnonuudistuksessa on kyse. Teen näkyväksi sen, minkälaisia merkityksiä kunnalle annetaan, minkälaisia laajempia yhteiskunnallisia vaikutuksia kuntamuutokseen liittyy, ja mistä kuntamuutoksessa itse asiassa on kyse. Tarkastelen kuntaa alati muuttuvana sosiaalisena konstruktiona. Fenomenologisen tutkimusotteen avulla teen näkyväksi kuntajohdon haastatteluista koostuvaa aineistoa analysoimalla, mistä puhumme, kun puhumme kunnasta. Tällä tavoin rekonstruoin kuntakäsitteen. Tutkimuksen käsitteellisinä lähtökohtina ovat kuntakäsitteen ulottuvuudet, hallinnonuudistusten sivuvaikutukset ja kunnan onttoutuminen analogiana valtion onttoutumisesta. Tutkin aihetta empiirisesti tapausesimerkin avulla, Kainuun hallintokokeilua tarkastelemalla. Kuntaan kohdistuvia vaikutuksia ovat haastatteluaineistoni analyysin perusteella organisatoris-toiminnalliset, johtamiseen liittyvät ja kuntakäsitysten muutokset. Muutospuhuntaa värittää läpileikkaavasti ristiriitaisuus. Grounded theory -menetelmää soveltaen olen muodostanut empirialähtöisen teorian kunnasta. Olen määritellyt neljä kunnan olemusta kuvaavaa perustehtävää: demokratiatehtävä, taloustehtävä, yhteisötehtävä ja hyvinvointitehtävä. Näitä tehtäviä yhdistää, niistä ammentaa ja niitä samanaikaisesti ruokkii määrittelemäni kunnan ydintehtävä, raison d´être, jonka mukaisesti kunta on elämisen edellytyksiä luova itsehallinnollinen paikallisyhteisö. Perustehtävät painottuvat eri tavoin eri kunnissa ja niiden painotukset vaihtelevat eri aikoina myös yksittäisen kunnan sisällä. Kunta voi siis olla kunta monella eri tavalla säilyttäen kuitenkin perusolemuksensa. Tutkimukseni perusteella kunnan tehtäväkentän rajaaminen näyttäytyy eri tavoin eri kunnissa. Tehtävien väheneminen itsessään ei horjuta kunnan asemaa ja merkitystä instituutiona. Muutoksen kokemisessa olennaista on kuntajohdon käsitys kunnasta. Palvelutehtävään nojaavissa kunnissa muutos näyttää vaikeammalta, kun taas sellaisissa kunnissa, joissa kunta nähdään moniulotteisempana kokonaisuutena, muutos näyttäytyy helpompana. Palvelukuntakäsitykseen perustuva näkemys kunnasta saa muutoksen näyttämään lopun alulta. Monipuolisempi kuntakäsitys auttaa näkemään muutoksessa uuden alun, jossa kunta on mahdollista keksiä uudelleen. Kunta ei sen tehtävien vähenemisen myötä onttoudu. Sen sijaan muutos paljastaa palvelukuntakäsityksen onttouden, jossa valtion kunnille määräämiin palvelutehtäviin keskittyneen kunnan idea on kadonnut vuosikymmeniä kasvaneen palvelukuorman alle. Tutkimukseni perusteella kuntamuutos näyttäytyy kumulatiivisena prosessina, jossa ei ole selväpiirteistä alkua eikä loppua, vaan jossa erilaiset sykäykset laittavat liikkeelle uusia muutosvoimia, jotka johtavat uusiin muutoksiin. Muutosten suunta vaihtelee eri kunnissa, mikä lisää kuntien erilaistumista. Kunnan olemassaolo näyttäytyy alati muuttuvana jatkumona, jossa kuntaa jatkuvasti rekonstruoidaan, ja jossa kuitenkin on eräitä kiinteästi mukana kulkevia peruselementtejä, jotka jäsentävät kuntana olemista. Hallinnonuudistuksen myötä kuntiin kohdistunut muutos on avannut mahdollisuuden tehdä näkyväksi kunnan olemuksen eri ulottuvuuksia ja kuntana olemisen monia tapoja. Kuntien erilaisuus ja kiihtyvä erilaistuminen haastaa vuosikymmeniä kuntia koskevaa lainsäädäntöä ohjanneen käsityksen kunnista geneerisenä, homogeenisena joukkona. Tämä ajattelutavan muutos vaikuttaa niin paikallistasolla, valtion kuntapolitiikkaan kuin kuntatutkimukseen. Kunta pakenee yhteen muottiin pakottavaa yhtenäiskunta-ajattelua, ja esiin tulevat monet rinnakkaiset kuntatodellisuudet. ; Local government, change and the change of local government This research concerns the change of local government. I focus on the question, how local government appears in a context of administrative reform that reduces the tasks of local government. I also study what kinds of effects the reform has on local government. The aim of this research is to increase understanding about the multidimensionality and the extension of this kind of reform. The research is em-pirical focusing on one case, the regional self-government experiment in Kainuu region, Finland. In my empirical case study research I show what meanings local government is given to, what kinds of broader societal effects the change of local government is connected to and what the change of local government as a whole is about. I consider local government as a constantly changing social construction. By using phenomenological research setting and by analyzing the interview data, I demonstrate what we talk about when talking about local government. By doing this I reconstruct the concept of local government. The conceptual basis of this research is based on the concept of local government, the side-effects of adminis-trative reforms and hollowing out of the local government as an analogy of hollow-ing out of the state. As a result of my grounded theory based analysis I have built an empirically based theory of local government. I examine the effects of the reform that are re-lated to local government and the meanings that local government is given to in the reform context. The local government related effects are 1) organizational and functional effects, 2) effects related to management and 3) the changes in local government conceptions. The rhetoric about change is contradictory when it comes to change, constancy and the nature of change. In my research I have also defined four main tasks for local government based on the data. These tasks are 1) democracy task, 2) economy task, 3) community task and 4) well-being task. These tasks are combined by the core task, raison d´être, of local government that ac-cording to my definition is as follows: local government is a local self-governmental community creating prerequisites for living. The basic tasks are em-phasized differently in different municipalities and the emphasis varies over time also in single municipalities. Local government can, thus, be local government in various ways still maintaining its basic essence. My research indicates that reducing local government tasks affect differently in different municipalities. Task reduction as such does not destabilize the status and meaning of local government. The way local government leaders understand local government seems to be essential when figuring out how the change is experienced. The change seems to be more difficult in municipalities that lean on the service task while the change seems to be easier in municipalities where local government is seen as a more multidimensional unity. Grounding the local government conception on the service task makes the change appear as the beginning of the end while the more versatile conception helps in seeing a new beginning in the change where it is possible to re-invent local government. Thus, local government will not hollow out due to the task reduction but the change reveals the hollowness of service municipality conception. Instead, it seems that the idea of local government has been lost during the decades when the state has given constantly new tasks to the local level. In the light of my research the change of local government appears as a cumulative process with no clear beginning nor clear end, as a process in which various pulses cause new drivers that lead to new changes. The direction of change varies in different municipalities which increases the differentiation of municipalities. The change fosters change so that the existence of local government can be seen as a constantly changing continuum where local government is continuously reconstructed and where are some firm basic elements that structure the existence of local government. The change that the reform has brought up has opened up the chance to make visible the various dimensions of the essence of local government and the various ways of how local government can exist. The difference and differentiation of municipalities challenge the conception of local government as a generic, homogenous group, the conception that has for decades steered the legislation concerning Finnish local government. This change of mindset will have effects not only on the local level but also on the national policy and research concerning local govern-ment. Local government cannot be categorized in one, single unitary form, but instead, various parallel local government realities emerge.

Kunnat ovat suuren muutoksen keskellä. Kuntarakenneuudistus sekä sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollon palvelurakenneuudistus tulevat muuttamaan kuntien hallintoa merkittävästi. Kari Hakarin tutkimus tarkastelee yhden suuren kaupungin hallinnonuudistusta uuden julkisen hallinnan teorian näkökulmasta. Uusi julkinen hallinta on kunnallishallinnon uudistamisen kolmas vaihe, joka on kehittynyt perinteisestä julkishallinnosta ja tätä seuranneesta uudesta julkisjohtamisesta. Tutkimuksen tavoitteena on arvioida, onko uudesta julkisesta hallinnasta kuntien hallinnonuudistusten uudeksi suunnaksi. Tutkimuksella tuetaan myös kuntien käytännön kehittämistoimintaa. Tutkimuskohteena on Tampereen kaupungin toteuttama kokonaisvaltainen toimintamallin uudistus. Uudistus muodostuu kolmesta osasta: pormestarijärjestelmästä, tilaaja–tuottaja-mallista sekä asiakaslähtöisestä prosessiajattelusta. Tutkimustulokset osoittavat, että Tampereen muutosprosessi toteuttaa varsin hyvin uuden julkisen hallinnan mukaista ajattelua. Se ei kuitenkaan edusta tätä moderneimmillaan, vaan perustuu vahvasti sekä byrokraattisen organisaation rakenteisiin että uuden julkisjohtamisen mukaiseen markkinoistumisen tavoitteeseen. Näyttää siltä, että Tampereenkin toimintamalli kaipaa päivittämistä, jotta se pystyy vastaamaan paremmin tulevaisuuden haasteisiin. Moderni uuden julkisen hallinnan kokonaisuus kuntien hallinnon kehittämisen näkökulmasta muodostuu 1) avoimesta kumppanuudesta asukkaiden, palvelutuottajien ja muiden sidosryhmien kanssa, 2) paikallisuuden ja yhteisöllisyyden korostamisesta, 3) monimuotoisesta suorasta ja edustuksellisesta demokratiasta, 4) asiakaslähtöisestä palvelujen kehittämisestä, 5) tulosperusteisesta palveluiden hankinnasta sekä 6) monimuotoisesta palvelutuotannosta. Muutos vallankäytössä on yksi uuden julkisen hallinnan ominaispiirre. Kunnan johtaminen edellyttää monimutkaistuvassa yhteiskunnassa uusia välineitä ja toimintatapoja. Tutkimuksen mukaan moderni kunnan johtaminen perustuu onnistuneelle yhdistelmälle pehmeää ja kovaa valtaa. Tutkimuksen mukaan uusi julkinen hallinta voi kehittyä kuntien hallinnonuudistusten perustaksi. Tätä tukee se, että uudessa julkisessa hallinnassa kehittämisperiaatteet muodostavat loogisen kokonaisuuden, jota voidaan käytännössä toteuttaa monin välinein erilaisissa tilanteissa. Lisäksi on olemassa ilmeinen tarve yhteiselle visiolle, jotta välttämättä edessä oleva kuntien hallinnonuudistus pystytään toteuttamaan. Uudet, isot reformit tarvitsevat aina mallin, johon muutos voidaan perustaa. Uuden julkisen hallinnan kehittymistä tukee myös se, että hallinnon kehittämisen käytännön toteutukset sekä kansainvälisesti että Suomessa toteuttavat jo monella tavoin uuden julkisen hallinnan mukaisia hallinnonuudistuksen kehityssuuntia. Tutkimus tuo uutta tietoa uuden julkisen hallinnan käytännön toteutuksesta suuressa suomalaisessa kaupungissa. Se näyttää myös suuntaa kuntien kehittämistyölle yhdistäen käytäntöä ja teoriaa ja tuo näin tietoa sekä käytännön kuntien kehittämistehtävissä toimiville että tutkijoille. Tampereen toimintamallin päivittämiselle se tarjoaa päämäärän, jota kohti edetä. ; The subject of this dissertation is the new public governance from the perspective of the local government management reforms. The research question is: how is the new public governance reflected in local government reforms? The research ques-tion will be examined from the perspectives of theory, practice and power relations. The empirical object of the study is the management reform of the City of Tampere, Finland. The reform includes three parts: the mayoral system, the purchaser-provider model and the customer-oriented process organization. The study also aims at the development of municipal operations, and presents new public governance as a comprehensive "theory of practice", which combines theory and practice and allows municipalities to find perspectives, tools and a theoretical framework for their management reforms. The study consists of four separate published sub-studies and this summary. The first sub-study deals with the theory of new public governance within the framework of the management reform of the City of Tampere. The second and third sub-studies are concerned with a variety of practical implementations of new public governance in the City of Tampere management reform. The fourth sub-project addresses power relations. In this summary the results are presented from the perspective of a management model, networked service development and the change in the exercise of power. Questionnaires were the empirical basis of the first two sub-studies, the third examined written documents and used interviews with experts and fourth sub-study relied on theme interviews with directors. New public governance (NPG) represents the third wave of the management re-forms evolving from a traditional public administration, and that following the new public management. An essential feature of the new public governance is that it does not completely reject earlier administrative reforms, but rather complements them with new solutions. NPG is based on the view that the public administration is no longer able alone to control society, but the success of governance is based on the partnership with the private and third sectors as well as with the citizens. Within the framework of new public governance one can, at least to some extent, identify three distinct trends. The differences between the trends are mainly in emphasis placed on various matters. Discussion of the new public governance started in network governance. Next, the new public governance was discussed from the perspective of democratic decision-making and public participation. The third emphasis seems to be on the new public governance as a development of customer-focused services and co-production. The results show that the process of change of the City of Tampere can be imple-mented quite well within the new public governance paradigm. At the beginning of the process the new public management was a decided basis of the reform. In the phases of preparation and implementation constraints and international experiences of weaknesses were perceived in the new public management model. On the basis of this, the management model has been developed further so that issues of new public governance such as local democracy, participation, networks and transparency of government have become stronger. The management model of Tampere does not, however, represent the new public governance in its modern form. The Tampere model is built on a basis of democracy and regulation of traditional public administration as well as the quasi-markets of the new public management. The modern new public governance reform seems to be moving especially towards a customer-oriented service development. According to this study the change in the use of power seems to be one of the characteristics of society's growing complexity and new public governance. There is a need for new instruments for leadership and in the exercise of power in an in-creasingly complex society. The modern municipal leadership is based on a suc-cessful combination of soft and hard power. The growth of new public governance as the next paradigm of management re-forms can be justified from three different perspectives. First, the new public gov-ernance is a logical entity. It brings together coherent principles of management reform, which can be implemented in practice by a variety of techniques in different situations. Second, there is an obvious need for a common vision for local gov-ernment reforms. New, large-scale reforms always need a new paradigm in which a change can be set up. There is a need for a common vision for the municipalities and their functions in order to implement local government reform. The new public governance could be the entirety that can show the way for the necessary man-agement reform of municipalities in Finland. Third, the practical implementations of management reforms both internationally and in Finland are already realizing the trends of management reform of new public governance in a number of ways.