Disability Expertise: Claiming Disability Anthropology
In: Current anthropology, Band 61, Heft S21, S. S26-S36
ISSN: 1537-5382
15185 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Current anthropology, Band 61, Heft S21, S. S26-S36
ISSN: 1537-5382
In: TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, Band 1, Heft 1-2, S. 77-81
ISSN: 2328-9260
Abstract
This section includes eighty-six short original essays commissioned for the inaugural issue of TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly. Written by emerging academics, community-based writers, and senior scholars, each essay in this special issue, "Postposttranssexual: Key Concepts for a Twenty-First-Century Transgender Studies," revolves around a particular keyword or concept. Some contributions focus on a concept central to transgender studies; others describe a term of art from another discipline or interdisciplinary area and show how it might relate to transgender studies. While far from providing a complete picture of the field, these keywords begin to elucidate a conceptual vocabulary for transgender studies. Some of the submissions offer a deep and resilient resistance to the entire project of mapping the field terminologically; some reveal yet-unrealized critical potentials for the field; some take existing terms from canonical thinkers and develop the significance for transgender studies; some offer overviews of well-known methodologies and demonstrate their applicability within transgender studies; some suggest how transgender issues play out in various fields; and some map the productive tensions between trans studies and other interdisciplines.
In: Journal of Philosophy of Disability (online first: April 5, 2022)
SSRN
In: Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, Band 5, Heft 4, S. 25
ISSN: 1929-9192
Disability studies, although an emerging discipline, has already advanced in the Global North compared to the Global South in that the discourse around disability has shifted its focus from mere survival debates of the persons with disabilities to subtler and more nuanced forms and manifestations of disability existence. Even at the policy level, the "medical model" of disability has been substituted by different versions of the "social model." The main idea of the "social model" of disability is that human beings are extremely diverse in terms of mental and bodily faculties, functions and structures, and disability indeed results from the "disabling" infrastructures and environment that society has created without taking this human diversity into account. Some versions of the "social model" go so far as to glorify the bodily and mental disabilities, deeming them merely as manifestations of human variation or diversity that offers a unique experience to be valued and celebrated (Roush & Sharby, 2011). Disability in any form is merely a variation of humanity, but the disadvantages this diversity creates are the lived-realities that should not and cannot be left unattended. What I find even more problematic is the idea of glorifying and romanticizing disability. Such a glorified notion of disability, I argue, becomes yet another means to oppressing the persons with disabilities. The "medical model" that some disability studies scholars in the Global North have discarded can prove still relevant to the Global South, and particularly to South Asia. If disability activists and civil society organizations relish only in the rhetoric of disability as a "human rights" issue, and not pay ample attention to the physical and mental realities of the persons with disabilities, the "rights-based" discourse could ultimately be counterproductive.
In: 105 California Law Review 837 (2017)
SSRN
In: Hypatia: a journal of feminist philosophy, Band 31, Heft 4, S. 762-778
ISSN: 1527-2001
In this essay, I develop an account of disability exclusion that, though inspired by Julia Kristeva, diverges from her account in several important ways. I first offer a brief interpretation of Kristeva's essays "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity and … Vulnerability" and "A Tragedy and a Dream: Disability Revisited" and, using this interpretation, I assess certain criticisms of Kristeva's position made by Jan Grue in his "Rhetorics of Difference: Julia Kristeva and Disability." I then argue that Kristeva's concept ofabjection,especially as developed by Sara Ahmed and Tina Chanter, offers important insights into disability oppression; Ahmed's and Chanter's contributions improve upon Kristeva's account. Understanding disability as abject helps to explain both resistances to interacting with disabled others and ways to resist disability oppression. Finally, I argue that understanding disability as abject is preferable to recent deployments of Lacanian theory in disability studies and that this account is compatible with social models of disability.
In: Journal of literary and cultural disability studies, Band 14, Heft 4, S. 387-401
ISSN: 1757-6466
In: Scandinavian journal of disability research, Band 13, Heft 3, S. 239-240
ISSN: 1745-3011
SSRN
In: Annual review of anthropology, Band 42, Heft 1, S. 53-68
ISSN: 1545-4290
Disability is a profoundly relational category, shaped by social conditions that exclude full participation in society. What counts as an impairment in different sociocultural settings is highly variable. Recently, new approaches by disability scholars and activists show that disability is not simply lodged in the body, but created by the social and material conditions that "dis-able" the full participation of those considered atypical. Historically, anthropological studies of disability were often intellectually segregated, considered the province of those in medical and applied anthropology. We show the growing incorporation of disability in the discipline on its own terms by bringing in the social, activist, reflexive, experiential, narrative, and phenomenological dimensions of living with particular impairments. We imagine a broad future for critical anthropological studies of disability and argue that as a universal aspect of human life this topic should be foundational to the field.
SSRN
In: Disabilities, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 317-329
ISSN: 2673-7272
Persons with disabilities still experience challenges in obtaining employment even though obligations associated with their employment are in place in legislative frameworks that strive to support transformation within the labour market. This paper explores employers' perspectives on the employment of persons with disabilities in South Africa identified in a case study. The influence of social capital on disability inclusive employment was explored from the perspective of two employers who employed trainees who completed an auxiliary training programme for persons with disabilities, which provides opportunities to facilitate pathways to economic inclusion and/or employment. Findings reveal that despite the call for increased labour inclusivity, the development of social capital is not clearly apparent when persons with disabilities are considered for employment. Organisational attitudes and beliefs seem to stem from the obligatory standpoint of the organisations. The paper highlights the need for employers to look beyond impairments so that employment goals are shared and re-enforced by understanding and possibly re-evaluating their views on their organisation's obligations, norms, values and mission, and goals. Insights can guide employers to think more holistically about ways to facilitate the economic inclusion of persons with disabilities.
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 307, Heft 1, S. 144-155
ISSN: 1552-3349
In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resig nation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the Same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by Law pro vide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the Presi dent and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a Presi dent shall be elected.
In: Cultural studies, Band 31, Heft 1, S. 171-173
ISSN: 1466-4348
In: Policy studies journal: an international journal of public policy, Band 21, S. 720-800
ISSN: 0190-292X
Pt. 1, Disability issues in public policy; pt. 2, Disability politics and practice. Comparison of the disabled rights movement to the women's rights movement, cost restrictions on some telecommunications decoders, organizing to obtain passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, media treatment of disability, employment of mentally ill persons, parenting standards in the field of child protection, and research and training capacity.