Ecocide
In order for ecocide to be recognized as international law, the International Criminal Court's Statute of Rome would have to be amended with the consent of 86 countries. Can political leaders and corporate executives be held accountable if the United States commits ecocide? To begin with, the International Criminal Court (ICC) was established to try those who had committed war crimes, crimes against humanity, or genocide. In order to prevent ecocide, it is necessary to consider not just human groups, but also the environment. Can we anticipate a genuine ecocide trial to take place in the near future now that the pretend court has been adjourned? In reference to the same battle, the then-Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme branded it as an "outrage of ecocide" two years later. Lawyer turned legal environmental activist, Polly Higgins, the organizer of the trial, urged to the United Nations that ecocide — the systematic destruction of ecosystems — be designated as the fifth international crime against peace. Despite the fact that a fake ecocide trial was a wonderfully entertaining event, the ramifications of the trial might have serious consequences for economic and governmental decision makers. Those who support the new definition, on the other hand, aim to establish ecocide as a distinct crime with the same symbolic and normative power as genocide. The idea of ecocide, on the other hand, refers to the treatment of nature and nonhuman animals as beings with intrinsic worth and rights that must be respected.