Suchergebnisse

AbstractBronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory (EST) is among the most widely adopted theoretical frameworks for studying individuals in ecological contexts. In its traditional formulation, different levels of ecological systems are viewed as nested within one another. In this article, we use Simmel's notion of intersecting social circles and Bronfenbrenner's earlier writing on social networks to develop an alternative 'networked' model that instead views ecological systems as an overlapping arrangement of structures, each directly or indirectly connected to the others by the direct and indirect social interactions of their participants. We redefine each of the systems discussed byEST—micro, meso, exo, macro, and chrono—based on patterns of social interaction, and then illustrate how this alternative model might be applied in the classic context of the developing child. We conclude by discussing future directions for how the networked model ofESTcan be applied as a conceptual framework, arguing that this approach offers developmental researchers with a more precise and flexible way to think about ecological contexts. We also offer some initial suggestions for moving a networkedESTmodel from theory to method.

A substantial proportion of sexual abuse victims report repeat sexual victimization within childhood or adolescence; however, there is limited understanding of factors contributing to revictimization for youth. Thus, the present study examined predictors of sexual revictimization prior to adulthood using ecological systems theory. Records of 1,915 youth presenting to a Child Advocacy Center (CAC) were reviewed to identify individual, familial, and community factors as well as initial abuse characteristics associated with risk for revictimization. Results showed that 11.1% of youth re-presented to the CAC for sexual revictimization. At the individual level, younger children, girls, ethnoracial minority youth, and those with an identified mental health problem were most likely to experience revictimization. Interpersonal factors that increased vulnerability included the presence of a noncaregiving adult in the home, being in mental health treatment, and domestic violence in the family. Community-level factors did not predict revictimization. When factors at all levels were examined in conjunction, however, only individual-level factors significantly predicted the risk for revictimization. Findings from this study provide valuable information for CACs when assessing risk for re-report of sexual abuse and add to the field's understanding of revictimization within childhood.

The deinstitutionalization of social care in Lithuania started in 2012 after the adoption of the strategic guidelines by the Ministry of Social Security and Labour. The goal of this reform was to improve the care conditions and introduce new community-based services for persons with disabilities. Almost ten years of the reform resulted in only five percent of persons with disabilities who moved to community settings, mainly group-living homes. The slow-motion of the reform, as well as the tensions in the communities, suggests the need for a thorough analysis of the process of deinstitutionalization and its improvement.
Bronfenbrenner's ecological theory is applied as a conceptual and methodological tool for understanding the roles of deinstitutionalization agents at different levels, including the Ministry of Social Security and Labour, municipalities, non-governmental organizations, social care institutions, and local communities. All of these agents are involved and diversely interact among themselves during the transformation process of the social care system. The ecological theory provides the necessary integrated approach to the analysis of the process of deinstitutionalization of the social care system at the micro-, meso-, exo-, and macro levels.
Deinstitutionalization and the trajectories of its participants reveal resilient connections with different fields of the ecological system and show that different system components not only represent different systems but become microsystems themselves that affect all elements in the ecological system.
The complexity of environmental systems constitutes the basis of ecological systems theory. It serves as a lens to guide the analysis of the transformation of a particular person's life in the context of deinstitutionalization. Herewith, it is an appropriate tool for understanding the impact of deinstitutionalization on specific local communities.

In diesem Beitrag diskutiere ich, inwiefern der ökosystemische Ansatz von BRONFENBRENNER (1981) als ein Sensibilisierungs- und Betrachtungsraster in Verbindung mit der qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse (MAYRING 2000, 2010) für die Untersuchung von empirischen Phänomen, insbesondere für eine mehrperspektivische Betrachtung (von Erklärungsmustern), geeignet ist. Dies geschieht jeweils unter theoretischer sowie forschungspraktischer Perspektive. Dementsprechend thematisiere ich nicht nur den Mehrwert des ökosystemischen Sensibilisierungs- und Betrachtungsrasters als ein analytisches (Hilfs-) Mittel, sondern ebenso, welche Konsequenzen der Einsatz zur Folge hat. Die verschiedenen Realitätsebenen (Mikro-, Meso-, Exo-, Makrosystem), die BRONFENBRENNER in seinem Ansatz definiert, ermöglichen einen differenzierten Blick auf unterschiedliche Entwicklungskontexte. Wie der ökosystemische Ansatz konkret als Sensibilisierungs- und Betrachtungsraster für empirische Phänomene mit der qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse verknüpft und an das empirische Material angelegt, also forschungspraktisch eingesetzt werden kann, wird anhand eines Forschungsbeispiels zu subjektiven Theorien von Lehrkräften illustriert.

The purpose of this study is to compare how Swedish school principals understand basic values that are important in fulfilling the Swedish national curriculum, Curriculum 1994 (a new curriculum, Curriculum 2011, which came into operation in autumn 2011, has only minor differences compared to the common text in Curriculum 1994), considering Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory. Two rounds (in 1998 and 2009) of somewhat different interview questions were conducted in the southern part of Sweden, and the data analysis technique of content analysis was chosen. The main results show a need to add levels into the original Bronfenbrenner ecological systems theory regarding basic values in the Swedish compulsory school system.

This book offers a paradigm shift in the framing of identity development by advancing a new, shock-sensitive framework for diverse young adult identity development after high school. The author builds on the critical theoretical contributions of Urie Bronfenbrenner and Margaret Beale Spencer that highlight the person-context nature of development and the dynamic nature of vulnerability, risk, and coping. The inclusive, policy-relevant theoretical approach emerges from the author's mixed-methods study that examines the context-dependent identity development experiences of young adults. The book also accounts for the unique person-context dynamics during the Great Recession and COVID-19 global shocks that drive how diverse young adults make meaning of risk as they cope with the shock-related disruptions on their individual postsecondary journeys toward building their adult identities. Given that the qualitative interview component of the study occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, this research offers a unique, in-real-time vantage point from participants who are making meaning of their choices and decisions as the shock was underway. The book also tracks the heightened importance of online tools during this period and the implications of virtual contexts where developmental activities are pursued, such as online education, work, and socializing. Advancing a new, shock-sensitive, interdisciplinary theory of identity development in postsecondary journeys of diverse young adults, it will appeal to scholars and students at the graduate level working across psychology, human development, educational psychology, sociology of education, and public policy.

Well-being can be described as the balance point between an individual's resources and difficult events in their life (Dodge et al., 2012). A student's well-being at school determines their educational success and functioning within their peer group in the school environment (Karataias et al., 2001; Huebner & Gilman, 2002; Polard & Lee, 2003; Engels et al., 2004; Konu & Lintonen, 2005; Soutter et al., 2013; Renshaw et al., 2015; Opre et al., 2018). The purpose of this article is to identify indicators of student well-being in four categories: school conditions, interpersonal relationships, means of self-realization, and health referring to the School Well-Being Model by Konu and Rimpelā (Konu et al., 2002) (based on Allardt's concept) and situating them in Bronfenbrenner's socio-ecological system. Having analyzed Erik Allardt's concept we decided to apply the dimensions of wellbeing he proposes to create measurable categories for recognizing levels of well-being. Allardt identifies three dimensions: having, loving, and being. Students' assessment of the school situation in the context of individual preferences cannot be neglected, since well-being affects taking on challenges related to various educational tasks. Adequate recognition of difficulties makes it possible to intervene in areas that are most important to promoting well-being. The development and functioning of individuals depend on contexts which are described as the five systems in the ecological model: the microsystem, the mesosystem, the exosystem, the macrosystem, and the chronosystem. The proposed well-being indicators can be used as items in questionnaire studies to obtain a multifaceted view of the conditions that influence students' sense of well-being. Recognizing the problem correctly allows the student to take corrective measures. The presented structure of student well-being indicators can be supplemented and expanded, to adapt to social, political, and health changes. ; Samopoczucie ucznia w szkole decyduje o jego sukcesie edukacyjnym oraz funkcjonowaniu w grupie rówieśników w przestrzeni szkoły. Celem niniejszego artykułu stało się wskazanie na możliwość wykorzystania koncepcji dobrobytu Erika Allardta dla określenia wymiarów samopoczucia ucznia w szkole przy uwzględnieniu kontekstów środowiskowych. Wyodrębniono wskaźniki samopoczucia ucznia, umocowane w systemie ekologicznym Bronfenbrennera, które pozwolą na określenie interesującego badawczo przedmiotu. Nie można pominąć osobistej oceny sytuacji szkolnej w kontekście indywidualnych preferencji, skoro samopoczucie rzutuje na realizację wyzwań związanych z różnorodnymi zadaniami edukacyjnymi. Właściwe rozpoznanie trudności pozwala na wkroczenie z działaniem interwencyjnym w te miejsca, które wymagają naprawy. Zaproponowane wskaźniki samopoczucia mogą służyć jako itemy zastosowane w badaniach kwestionariuszowych. Pozwalają na wielopłaszczyznowy ogląd uwarunkowań, wpływających na odczucie dobrostanu ucznia. Właściwe rozpoznanie problemu daje szansę podjęcia działań korekcyjnych.

Well-being can be described as the balance point between an individual's resources and difficult events in their life (Dodge et al., 2012). A student's well-being at school determines their educational success and functioning within their peer group in the school environment (Karataias et al., 2001; Huebner & Gilman, 2002; Polard & Lee, 2003; Engels et al., 2004; Konu & Lintonen, 2005; Soutter et al., 2013; Renshaw et al., 2015; Opre et al., 2018). The purpose of this article is to identify indicators of student well-being in four categories: school conditions, interpersonal relationships, means of self-realization, and health referring to the School Well-Being Model by Konu and Rimpelā (Konu et al., 2002) (based on Allardt's concept) and situating them in Bronfenbrenner's socio-ecological system. Having analyzed Erik Allardt's concept we decided to apply the dimensions of wellbeing he proposes to create measurable categories for recognizing levels of well-being. Allardt identifies three dimensions: having, loving, and being. Students' assessment of the school situation in the context of individual preferences cannot be neglected, since well-being affects taking on challenges related to various educational tasks. Adequate recognition of difficulties makes it possible to intervene in areas that are most important to promoting well-being. The development and functioning of individuals depend on contexts which are described as the five systems in the ecological model: the microsystem, the mesosystem, the exosystem, the macrosystem, and the chronosystem. The proposed well-being indicators can be used as items in questionnaire studies to obtain a multifaceted view of the conditions that influence students' sense of well-being. Recognizing the problem correctly allows the student to take corrective measures. The presented structure of student well-being indicators can be supplemented and expanded, to adapt to social, political, and health changes. ; Samopoczucie ucznia w szkole decyduje o jego sukcesie edukacyjnym oraz funkcjonowaniu w grupie rówieśników w przestrzeni szkoły. Celem niniejszego artykułu stało się wskazanie na możliwość wykorzystania koncepcji dobrobytu Erika Allardta dla określenia wymiarów samopoczucia ucznia w szkole przy uwzględnieniu kontekstów środowiskowych. Wyodrębniono wskaźniki samopoczucia ucznia, umocowane w systemie ekologicznym Bronfenbrennera, które pozwolą na określenie interesującego badawczo przedmiotu. Nie można pominąć osobistej oceny sytuacji szkolnej w kontekście indywidualnych preferencji, skoro samopoczucie rzutuje na realizację wyzwań związanych z różnorodnymi zadaniami edukacyjnymi. Właściwe rozpoznanie trudności pozwala na wkroczenie z działaniem interwencyjnym w te miejsca, które wymagają naprawy. Zaproponowane wskaźniki samopoczucia mogą służyć jako itemy zastosowane w badaniach kwestionariuszowych. Pozwalają na wielopłaszczyznowy ogląd uwarunkowań, wpływających na odczucie dobrostanu ucznia. Właściwe rozpoznanie problemu daje szansę podjęcia działań korekcyjnych.

In March 2020, The state of New York became the American epicenter of the Covid-19 pandemic with the most vulnerable of populations including older adults being affected. As a result of the Government shut-down to slow the spread of Covid-19, many primary care social workers, including this writer pivoted to remote telework detail on short notice. While utilizing an ecological systems theoretical framework, this article will explore how primary care social workers in the Veterans Health Administration worked through the Covid-19 pandemic to effectively provide social work services and case management to older adult Veterans.