Suchergebnisse

The paper looks same results of last years inter-branch science investigations and follow inevitable inclusion the results in context of economic theory. New parts of inter-branch sciences (behavioral, evolutional, institutional and other economics) doubts of evidence of traditional economic theory main postulates, and offer alternative conceptions for explanation economic phenomena. This is a challenge to economists who maintains of stable fundamentals.

The review presents a discussion at the session of the Scientific Council of Moscow State University on the development of modern economic theory and Russian model of social and economic development. The session, held on November 28, 2019 at the Faculty of Economics in Lomonosov Moscow State University, was dedicated to two dates - the 215th anniversary of the Department of Political Economy and the 115th anniversary of N. A. Tsagolov. The topic of scientific discussion: "Interdisciplinary approach - the key to solving theoretical and practical problems of modern time". During the discussion, issues related to interdisciplinary method in economic theory, University traditions and modern experience of interdisciplinary method in economic science were discussed. Speakers also concentrated on the problems of national political economy development, inseparably connected with the history of the Department of Political Economy at the Faculty of Economics in Moscow University. Special attention was paid to the period of the development of the Department under the leadership of N. A. Tsagolov and formation of the scientific school connected with his name. The discussion focused on the interdisciplinary approach developed by "Tsagolov School", the possibility of its development under the conditions of a new scientific and technological revolution, and its role in the effective study of economy and society in the twenty-first century.

Article about synthesis of theory the self-organizing and the institutional economic theory. The author proves the thesis about exogenous an origin of institutional processes in economy and cyclic institutional development.

Introduction. Economic theory as a fundamental economic and social science, born out of the dominance of the market (capitalist) mode of management, is constantly evolving, improving and enriching by new ideas and concepts. A penetrating analysis of the nature of its historical development makes it possible to identify and characterize certain cycles in the changing ideological attitudes of theoretical economists.Purpose of the research: study of the nature and trends of economic theory through the prism of the main paradigms, the formulation of their own evaluative judgments and the forecast of subsequent paradigmatic changes.Methods: deductive and comparative analyses.Results. The main paradigms of the development of theoretical economic thought are defined by the author as etatism and liberalism. The ideology of etatism tilts one part of economists on the side of the state, hopes for its «collective mind» in the regulation of economic and social life; liberal ideology makes the rest of the theorists advocates economic freedom, liberal ideology makes the rest of theorists advocates economic freedom, rational model of individual and «natural order» behavior under the influence of the market laws. Three paradigm cycles have been traced and described in the development of economic theory: 1) mercantilism → classical political economy → Marxist political economy (from the beginning of the XVI th century to the last third of the XIX th century); 2) Marxist theory → neoclassical economics→ keynesian economics (from the last third of the XIX th century up to the 1970s of the XX century); 3) keynesian economics → neoliberal and new classical economic theory → behavioral (experimental) economics (from the mid-1970 s.).Discussion. The analysis concluded that instead of the initial antagonism of economic ideologies of etatism and liberalism, since the second cycle, there has been a trend towards convergence and mutual enrichment. In the near term, the growth of etatistic ideology in the development of economic science is forecast, as evidenced by interest in the «experimental economy» The main explanation of the cyclicality of the main paradigms of the development of the theoretical economy the author sees in the change of generations of outstanding scientists-economists, change of «intellectual fashion».

The article examines the tradition of teaching economic theory at Moscow University since the late 19th to the early 21st century through basic textbooks, which reflect the specificity, theoretical and practical problems of the corresponding historical periods. The narrative proposed shows the emergence of innovative textbooks that embody the breakthroughs in both the subject and method of economic theory and the methodology for its teaching. Apprehension of students and recognition of colleagues have become well-deserved attributes of manuals by A.I. Chuprov, N.A. Tsagolov and Yu.N. Cheremnykh. As well as many others, they absorbed, developed, and passed on from generation to generation the experience of teaching fundamental economic disciplines. Drawing on the «pendulum principle» widely used in the research of various intellectual thoughts, the authors show the main features of the new generation of textbooks that will be in demand by students and teachers shortly. While maintaining consistency in reflecting economic reality, the new manuals should meet the requirements of digital economy, such as fundamental and, at the same time, practical orientation of students. According to the authors, basic courses and textbooks on economic theory will be more interactive while their content expansion will occur due to behavioral aspects at both micro- and macrolevels. That will allow students to learn the principles of mainstream and alternative theoretical approaches to solving urgent practical problems.

The article examines the tradition of teaching economic theory at Moscow University since the late 19th to the early 21st century through basic textbooks, which reflect the specificity, theoretical and practical problems of the corresponding historical periods. The narrative proposed shows the emergence of innovative textbooks that embody the breakthroughs in both the subject and method of economic theory and the methodology for its teaching. Apprehension of students and recognition of colleagues have become well-deserved attributes of manuals by A.I. Chuprov, N.A. Tsagolov and Yu.N. Cheremnykh. As well as many others, they absorbed, developed, and passed on from generation to generation the experience of teaching fundamental economic disciplines. Drawing on the «pendulum principle» widely used in the research of various intellectual thoughts, the authors show the main features of the new generation of textbooks that will be in demand by students and teachers shortly. While maintaining consistency in reflecting economic reality, the new manuals should meet the requirements of digital economy, such as fundamental and, at the same time, practical orientation of students. According to the authors, basic courses and textbooks on economic theory will be more interactive while their content expansion will occur due to behavioral aspects at both micro- and macrolevels. That will allow students to learn the principles of mainstream and alternative theoretical approaches to solving urgent practical problems.

The article describes the essence of the concept of "economic studies" in the context of modern economic theory and practice of management. In the broad sense, economic studies are a polyconceptual system of knowledge, the development of which is connected with the constant emergence, justification, expansion of influence of some theories, refutation of others and their confrontation. In a more narrow sense, economic studies are a set of economic, political, information and communication processes and activities that take place at regional, national and global levels. The place of economic studies in modern scientific researches is defined: economic, political, information and communication directions. A certain structure of economic studies in accordance with modern scientific researches and actual problems of humanity is offered. Economics as a discipline consists of two components: scientific principles of formation and development of science and discipline "Economic Studies", ie the study of fundamental changes; theoretical foundations of formation and development of economic studies. Issues that must be resolved in everyday economic life, necessitate their prompt decision with the help of a permanent mechanism. The key components of economics studies as a discipline are considered: information Intervention is a set of purposeful measures that provide channels of distribution and telecommunication of mass trend information in a predetermined mode; smart specialization envisages stimulation of innovative activity and introduction of innovations, activation of long-term structural changes in the economy of the region with a long-term orientation; regional studios – it is a complex category that is relevant to the research and monitoring of the processes taking place in the region. Regional studios can create the preconditions for forming transnational economic and cultural ties, which confirms the close link between regional and economic studios. International economic organizations also play an important role - as a worldwide platform for economic studies. ; В статті розкрито сутність поняття «економічні студії» в контексті сучасної економічної теорії та практики господарювання. У широкому розумінні економічні дослідження - це поліконцептуальна система знань, розвиток якої пов'язаний з постійним виникненням, обґрунтуванням, розширенням впливу одних теорій, спростуванням інших та їх протистоянням. У більш вузькому розумінні економічні студії – це сукупність економічних, політичних, інформаційних та комунікаційних процесів та напрямків, що відбуваються на регіональному, національному та глобальному рівнях. Визначено місце економічних студій у сучасних наукових дослідженнях: економічному, політичному, інформаційному та комунікаційному напрямах. Запропоновано певну структуру економічних досліджень відповідно до сучасних наукових досліджень та актуальних проблем людства. Економічні студії як дисципліна складається з двох складових: наукових засад становлення та розвитку науки та дисципліни «Економічні студії», тобто вивчення фундаментальних змін; теоретичні основи становлення та розвитку економічних досліджень. Питання, які мають бути вирішені у повсякденному та економічному житті, потребують їх швидкого вирішення за допомогою постійного механізму. Основними компонентами економічних студій як навчальної дисципліни вважаються: інформаційне втручання – це сукупність цілеспрямованих заходів, що забезпечують канали розповсюдження та телекомунікації інформації про масові тенденції у заздалегідь визначеному режимі; розумна спеціалізація, що передбачає стимулювання інноваційної діяльності та впровадження інновацій, активізацію довгострокових структурних змін в економіці регіону з довгостроковою орієнтацією; регіональні студії – це складна категорія, яка має відношення до досліджень та моніторингу процесів, що відбуваються в регіоні. Регіональні студії можуть створити передумови для формування транснаціональних економічних та культурних зв'язків, що підтверджує тісний зв'язок між регіональними та економічними студіями. Міжнародні економічні організації також відіграють важливу роль - як всесвітню платформу для економічних студій.

The economic theory of Marxism is one of the fundamental trends that continue the classical tradition in economic science. Like any body of theoretical knowledge, the economic theory of Marxism cannot become outdated; it can only be discarded by managerial practice as unwanted. Practice shows that within modern management, situations increasingly arise that can only be explained adequately within the framework of classical political economy. The awakening of interest in the classical tradition, and accordingly, in Marx's economic theory, is due to the fact that it retains within itself the whole indispensable set of instruments for economic analysis of the state of the modern economy. Moreover, the basic positions of Marxism coincide in some cases with ultra-modern (institutional) concepts. Today, a return to the ideas of Marxism is possible only on several conditions: a) if this theoretical current is cleansed of accumulated vulgarisms and distortions; b) if there is a rethinking of outmoded positions that have been disproved by reality; c) if Marxist methodology is employed for analysing the present-day economy. This course of instruction is aimed at the study and assimilation of the theoretical bases of the classical, politico-economic school in economic science-Marxism.

In the article in Scientific achievements of the famous Ukrainian scientist-economist G. F are being illuminated. Symonenko Tune with the institutional economic theory. The contribution to enlargement and deepening of knowledge on this direction of economic science is Shown, in particular about action of economic laws in material and intangible production. The development of the scientific program of the further socio-economic development of Ukraine envisages studying the theoretical developments of scientists of economic science, which could be used to develop their own, national model of economic reform in Market basis. Our Domestic science has a whole tribe of prominent economists, who, despite different adverse circumstances, primarily lack of statehood, Fruitfully Worked on the scientific field. Among them-professor of Kyiv Imperial University of St. Vladimir G. F. Simonenko. His scientific works positive affected the development of economic science, in particular, its direction as institutional economic theory. The Study of scientific heritage of G. F. Symonenko will reduce the number of little-known scientists, will open (resurrect) new names in science. Native scientists from his scientific creativity will draw Enthusiasm, inspiration for his fruitful work, certain ideas for further creative development of economic theory. Purpose of article There is a study of creative achievements of the well-known Ukrainian scientist-economist G. F. Symonenko, where questions are violated with the institutional economic theory or tangent to it. In the process of research increased attention to the disclosure of such tasks as: The attitude of G. F. Symonenko to material and intangible productions, their interrelation and conditions of existence; Reflections on the action of economic laws; Interpretation of the category of productive and unproductive work; Difference of theory of classical political economy from the teaching of old-historical economic school; Studying the ratio of individual and public welfare; Detail of analytical observation of economic phenomena and facts in different historical circumstances; Deepening of observation methodology and abstraction in economic research. In the writings of G. F. Symonenko, the material and non-material production was investigated, the action of economic laws was studied, especially in creation of services and goods. By Changing the conditions of economic laws ' action, the State can influence economic relations and welfare of people. The natural nature of the laws, their manifestations in the process of economic activity of people is Underlined. The productive and unproductive work in the spirit of the requirements of institutional economic theory, their harmonious correlation is Considered. People's welfare in close connection with the political and moral conditions is being covered. The ratio of individual and public well-being was Studied. In Depth methodology of economic research, it is indicated on equality and equal value of all methods of studying economic phenomena and processes. Methodological vision of the necessity of consideration of economic activity in the position of morality is Substantiated. ; У статті висвітлюються наукові здобутки відомого українського вченого - економіста Г.Ф. Симоненка, співзвучні з інституціональною економічною теорією. Показується внесок ученого у розширення та поглиблення знань з даного напрямку економічної науки, зокрема про дію економічних законів у матеріальному і нематеріальному виробництвах. Адже розробка наукової програми подальшого соціально-економічного розвитку України передбачає вивчення теоретичних напрацювань вчених економічної науки, які можна було б використати для вироблення власної, національної моделі реформування економіки на ринкових засадах. Метою статті є вивчення творчих досягнень відомого українського вченого - економіста Г. Ф. Симоненка, де порушуються питання, співзвучні з інституціональною економічною теорією або дотичні до неї. В процесі дослідження підвищена увага зверталася на розкриття таких завдань, як: ставлення науковця до матеріального і нематеріального виробництв, їх взаємозв'язок та умови існування.

The article presents a survey of the main positions presented in the talks delivered by participants in a discussion, taking place at a session of the Academic Council of Moscow State University on 28 November 2019, on the elaboration of modern economic theory and of the Russian model of socio-economic development. The session of the Academic Council took place in the Faculty of Economics of the M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, and was timed to coincide with two anniversary dates: the 215th anniversary of the chair of political economy of Moscow University and the 115th anniversary of the birth of N.A. Tsagolov. The theme of the discussion was: "The interdisciplinary approach — the key to solving the theoretical and practical problems of the modern age". The panellists discussed questions associated with the role of the interdisciplinary approach in economic theory. Also at the centre of attention were questions of the development of Russian political economy, a topic linked indissolubly with the history of the faculty, as well as questions related to the formation of the academic "Tsagolov school" and to its influence on the development of modern economic science.

The article is devoted to the evolution of scientific schools of the Department of Economic Theory, Regional Economics, and State and Municipal Management of South Ural State University (National Research University), which celebrates the 70th anniversary since its formation this year. During its development, it has gone from a service department (teaching the "Political Economy" discipline) to the department combining the functions of a service (teaching the "Economics" discipline) and a graduate one (Bachelor's and Master's degree programs) in the "State and Municipal Administration" field of training. Various research has been conducted at the department. Initially it studied the "Macro- and microeconomical problems of the evolution of socio-economic problems". Later it engaged in the "Study of the nature of transformation processes in the Russian economy during the transition to the market period". Today it conducts active research on the problems of the regional economy and municipal management. Many of the department's teaching staff members participate in the regional expert community of Chelyabinsk and the Chelyabinsk Region. In connection with the strategic scientific projects of the Priority 2030 Program, the following fields have become the focus of scientific research: "Analyzing the promising specializations in the region's industrial space", "Research and evaluation of the agglomeration effects in the economic space of the subjects of the Russian Federation". ; Статья посвящена эволюции научных школ кафедры «Экономическая теория, региональная экономика, государственное и муниципальное управление» Южно-Уральского государственного университета (национального исследовательского университета), которой в этом году исполняется 70 лет. За время развития кафедра и ее коллектив прошли путь от сервисной (преподающей дисциплину «Политическая экономия») до кафедры, сочетающей функции сервисной (преподающей дисциплину «Экономика»), и выпускающей (бакалавриат и магистратура) по направлению подготовки ...

The article deals with the scientific achievements of the scholars of the German historical school of classical political economy, which positively influenced the further development of economic science and, in particular, the institutional economic theory.On the basis of studying the works of scientists it was established that the borrowing by the founders of the named theory of the necessity of considering economic, legal and social relations in unity, addressing the problems of morality, culture, the spirit of society, use, in the analysis of economic life, the state of development of socio-cultural environment, deepened the process of studying noneconomic factors of economic activity.The use of systematic in the study of the economy increased the number of tools in the process of scientific research, contributed to the dissemination of historical method of research, as well as the introduction of an interdisciplinary approach. ; У статті розглянуто наукові здобутки вчених німецької історичної школи класичної політичної економіки, котрі позитивно вплинули на подальший розвиток економічної науки й, зокрема, інституціональної економічної теорії.На основі аналізу праць учених установлено, що запозичення засновниками названої теорії необхідності розгляду економічних, правових і соціальних відносин у єдності, звернення до проблем моралі, культури, духу суспільства, використання під час аналізу господарського життя, стану розвитку соціально-культурного середовища поглибило процес вивчення неекономічних факторів господарської діяльності.Використання системності під час вивчення економіки збільшило чисельність інструментарію в процесі наукового пошуку, сприяло поширенню історичного методу дослідження, а також запровадженню міждисциплінарного підходу.

Introduction. Basically, the issues of economic security are considered at the macroeconomic level. Attention focuses on the segment, sectoral approach in the study of the problem, which in turn makes it impossible for economies of European countries to fully prepare for the existing threats. In this connection, there is a need for further study of the issue especially in the context of macroeconomics as a segment of mega European economic system. Purpose. The purpose of the article is to analyze different points of view regarding the concepts of economic security of the state. Methods. Causal method, methods of analysis and synthesis of historical and logical methods. Results. The economic security providing is the main topic of the article. Comprehensive analysis of modern and former views on the given question was conducted in its historical transformation. Various approaches of determining economic security were considered. The best model of ensuring the economic security was offered for Ukraine. The need of close cooperation of Ukraine with the European Union was proved. Originality. It was determined that the choice of models providing economic security should be determined according to the stages of development. Detailed classification of the stages of development of countries in violation of the objective economic laws and mechanisms of influence on the management of economic and financial systems criminogenic factors is offered. Conclusion. The issues of economic security are considered at the macroeconomic level. Attention focuses on the segment, sectoral approach in the study of the problem, which in turn makes it impossible for economies of European countries to fully prepare for the existing threats. In this connection, there is a need for further study of the issue especially in the context of macroeconomics as a segment of mega European economic system. The question was researched considering stable social and political situation in the country as well as in the whole world. The research to provide economic security as the basis for national security was not carried out under conditions of social and political crisis, war.

The article is based on retrospective analysis conducted a critical analysis of theoretical approaches to determining the nature of "expenses" and "costs" in economic theory and accounting, which allowed to establish their relationship and fundamental differences and to create a personal approach to the scientific view of these concepts ; У статті на основі ретроспективного аналізу проведено критичний аналіз теоретичних підходів щодо визначення сутності "затрат" та "витрат" в економічній теорії та бухгалтерському обліку, що дозволило встановити їх взаємозв'язок та основні відмінності, а також сформувати особистий підхід щодо наукового бачення цих понять