Suchergebnisse

Education for democratic citizenship (EDC) encompasses all educational practices aimed at preparing young people and adults for life in a democratic society and helping them become active, informed and responsible citizens. The changes that have taken place over the past 18 years in Poland have not bypassed the school evaluation system. The country has slowly passed from a system of "hard control" to one of "soft supervision," and its control functions have been strongly limited to make way for consultancy and support.Obviously it is now impossible to foresee the future of school evaluation – many educators agree that the 2006 law meant less bureaucracy, but some add that it might also mean more control and less school autonomy. Whether and when we will see new regulations in this field remains unclear now. It can only be hoped that bodies running the school (both local governments and other "owners" of the schools), independent of the Ministry, will in some places (if not everywhere) support an initiative for real quality assurance. Incentives, such as diplomas or quality badges, might also help teachers and schools take part in a "pilot" or "large -scale" programme of introducing quality assurance in Education for Democratic Citizenship.

The article presents the history of the military higher education system, which is connected to the shaping of the Polish statehood as well as its present state. The structure of this type of education system was dependent on the e ectiveness of socio-economic, political and military activities of public authorities. However, it is only the November Uprising which is generally associated with the revolt of the o cers from the O cer Cadets School [Szkoła Podchorazych] in Warsaw. The changes which occur within the military education system on account of its adjustment to the requirements of the Act "Law on higher education" of 27 June 2005 are very positive. They accommodate military higher education institutions to the public system of higher education, they in uence the development and the quality of education in these institutions, they obliged them to implement the regulations arising from the National Quali cations Framework and to observe all the procedures arising from the legislations which are enacted in the domain of higher education by the competent public authorities.

Intencją autorów jest przyjrzenie się obecnemu kierunkowi reform szkolnictwa wyższego w Polsce przez pryzmat zrealizowanej nordyckiej utopii, czyli tych rozwiązań systemowych dotyczących szkolnictwa i uniwersytetów, do których w sensie ideowym i strukturalnym zmierza także polskie szkolnictwo wyższe. Mimo wieloletniej tradycji wykorzystywania uniwersytetów do realizacji idei egalitaryzmu i utylitaryzmu społecznego w myśl założeń państwa opiekuńczego, państwa nordyckie w ciągu ostatnich dwudziestu lat stopniowo zmieniły politykę szkolnictwa wyższego i poczyniły znaczące kroki w kierunku zastąpienia modelu kontroli państwa nad szkolnictwem wyższym modelem luźniejszego nadzoru państwowego nad tym sektorem. Przeszły zatem wcześniej niż Polska zmianę, którą teoretycy umiejscawiają w szerszym kontekście ewolucji humboldtowskiego modelu szkolnictwa wyższego w kierunku modelu anglo-amerykańskiego. Niniejszy tekst dotyczy głównych aspektów i linii podziału między systemem anglo-amerykańskim i humboldtowskim w odniesieniu do dwóch metaobszarów funkcjonowania szkolnictwa wyższego, tj. zarządzania i finansowania. Zestawienie proponowanych rozwiązań polskich z wprowadzonymi już rozwiązaniami w krajach nordyckich ma na celu ukazanie skomplikowania i większej złożoności tego procesu niż mogłoby to wynikać ze schematycznych opisów typów idealnych. ; The authors' intent is to examine the current direction of reforms in Poland's higher education in the light of the fulfilled Nordic utopia, i.e. the systemie Solutions in school education and universities which Poland's higher education is aiming for, ideologically and structurally. Despite many years of tradition in employing universities as a tool to establish the idea of egalitarism and social utilitarianism within a welfare State, Nordic countries have gradually modified their higher education policies in the last twenty years, making significant steps towards replacing the State control model with a more loose State supervision over the sector. Therefore, they went ahead of Poland in making a change which theoreticians put in a broader context of evolution from the Humboldtian to the Anglo- American model of higher education. The paper focuses on key aspects and dividing lines between the Anglo-American model and the Humboldtian model, making a reference to two meta-areas of higher education i.e. management and funding. The proposed Polish Solutions are juxtaposed with the already-implemented Nordic Solutions in order to show that this process is more complex than one might assume on the basis of formulaic descriptions of ideal types.

The modern model of state education in Russia promotes patriotism and devotion to the authorities. Young people must be proud of their origin and, in spite of deteriorating material conditions, should stay in the country contributing to its development. Cadet Corps Alumni are an example of a patriotic education model. Several years of learning in the military school shapes their beliefs and teaches them complete surrender to authority. Patriotism, combined with the sense of external threat, has become the driving force behind the reconstruction of the Russian superpower. One of the cornerstones of the school is the acceptance of Putin's Russia by spreading the vision of becoming an international representative of the country. The increase in military spending and functioning of military schools such as the Corps of Cadets give rise to fears that in the future Russia the army will become one of the tools of the superpower on the arena of foreign policy. ; The modern model of state education in Russia promotes patriotism and devotion to the authorities. Young people must be proud of their origin and, in spite of deteriorating material conditions, should stay in the country contributing to its development. Cadet Corps Alumni are an example of a patriotic education model. Several years of learning in the military school shapes their beliefs and teaches them complete surrender to authority. Patriotism, combined with the sense of external threat, has become the driving force behind the reconstruction of the Russian superpower. One of the cornerstones of the school is the acceptance of Putin's Russia by spreading the vision of becoming an international representative of the country. The increase in military spending and functioning of military schools such as the Corps of Cadets give rise to fears that in the future Russia the army will become one of the tools of the superpower on the arena of foreign policy.

The aim of this article is to investigate how the European university education sector is being internationalized. The authors test "European Studies" programs, assuming that due to their peculiar character they are the forerunners of change, which results, among other things, from Europeanization processes. The field of "Teaching Europe" is mapped in the European Union and then a more detailed analysis is conducted in Poland and Germany. These allow the authors to formulate three models describing how universities in Europe are answering the challenges created by the integration process. The Polish and German cases further illustrate the dynamics of "European Studies" development, as well as differences in general aims, disciplinary construction as well as level of internationalization. Various geographical patterns of enhanced collaboration are revealed by the research when checking Double Degree programs.

The increasing complexity of the academic enterprise in Europe is due to several general factors: globalization and Europeanization, educational expansion and massification of higher education, the economic crisis, reform pressures in the public sector, growing pressures for accountability, and knowledge-driven economic competitiveness of nations and regions. Factors generating change in national higher education policies and in national higher education systems have been multilayered, interrelated and often common throughout the continent. Reforms increasingly, and throughout Europe, lead to further reforms rather than to reformed higher education systems. Higher education has changed substantially in most European economies in the last two or three decades but it is still expected by national and European-level policymakers to change even more. Universities, throughout two centuries of their modern history, change as their environments change, especially in connection with changes in the functioning of nation-states and various forms of welfare states. Different directions of current and projected academic restructuring in different national systems add to the complexity of the picture at a European level.