Suchergebnisse

Analysis of secondary data from surveys of the 1970s contradicts propositions that egalitarianism was or is accepted by the great majority of Yugoslavians. Nonegalitarian values are shown to exist in the Yugoslavian population; in fact, nonegalitarianist thought prevails in higher social strata. Ideological implications of this finding are discussed, & the functions of egalitarianism in Yugoslav society are explored. It is determined that the "egalitarian syndrome" helps integrate & stabilize the society, but also contributes to long term economic stagnation, which undermines societal integration & paves the way for actualizing inert social tensions & conflicts. Short-term responses to these tendencies are discussed, & it is determined that only through radical changes in how political power is legitimated can long-term regulation for these inherent contradictions be provided. 31 References. D. Dennis

Machine generated contents note:1.Introduction --1.1.The Distributive Ideal of Justice --1.2.The Relational Ideal of Justice --1.3.Relational Egalitarianism: A Thumbnail Sketch of Its Recent History --1.4.An Overview of the Book --1.5.Summary --pt. INATURE --2.Relational Egalitarianism --2.1.Introduction --2.2.Luck Egalitarianism versus Relational Egalitarianism --2.3.Anderson's Critique of Luck Egalitarianism --2.4.Democratic Equality --2.5.Scheffler's Critique of Luck Egalitarianism --2.6.The Egalitarian Deliberative Constraint --2.7.A Comparison --2.8.Conclusion --3.Relating to One Another As Equals --3.1.Introduction --3.2.Equals with Regard to What? --3.3.Relating, Regarding and Treating --3.4.Treating As --3.5.Equals --3.6.Regarding As Equals --3.7.The Ideal of Relational Equality and Ideal Ways of Relating As Equals --3.8.Conclusion --4.Equality and Being in a Position to Hold Others Accountable: A Case Study --4.1.Introduction --4.2.What Is Hypocritical Blame? --4.3.Wallace's Egalitarian Account of the Distinctive Wrongness of Hypocrisy --4.4.Why Not Hypocrisy? --4.5.Hypocrisy and Relational Equality --4.6.Conclusion --pt. IISITE, SCOPE AND JUSTIFICATION --5.Egalitarian Relations: Time, Site and Scope --5.1.Introduction --5.2.Intergenerational Justice --5.3.Age --5.4.Site --5.5.Scope --5.6.Conclusion --6.Justification of and by the Ideal --6.1.Introduction --6.2.Instrumentally Valuable --6.3.Non-Instrumentally Valuable for Persons --6.4.Impersonally Valuable --6.5.Not (Primarily) Valuable, but Required --6.6.Aims of Real-Life Egalitarians and the Value of Equality --6.7.Conclusion --pt. IIIRELATIONAL AND DISTRIBUTIVE EQUALITY --7.Pluralist Egalitarianism --7.1.Introduction --7.2.Consistency --7.3.An Underlying Disagreement about Justification? --7.4.Reduction --7.5.Dispositional Egalitarianism --7.6.Pluralist Egalitarianism --7.7.Conclusion --8.Often the Twain Meet --8.1.Introduction --8.2.Anderson on Equality of Opportunity and/or Capability --8.3.Offensive Tastes --8.4.Snobbery --8.5.Dworkinian Bureaucracy --8.6.Cohen on Justificatory Community --8.7.Communal Camping --8.8.Conclusion --9.Conclusion.