Opportunity egalitarianism and income inequality
In: Mathematical social sciences, Band 44, Heft 1, S. 45-64
652 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Mathematical social sciences, Band 44, Heft 1, S. 45-64
In: Mathematical social sciences, Band 43, Heft 2, S. 251-265
In: Social philosophy & policy, Band 19, Heft 1, S. 1-35
ISSN: 1471-6437
A central idea of contemporary philosophical egalitarianism's
theory of justice is that involuntary inequalities or
disadvantages—those that arise through no choice or fault
of one's own—should be minimized or rectified in
some way. Egalitarians believe that the preferred institutional
vehicle for fulfilling these obligations of justice is some
form of a welfare state. Of course, contemporary egalitarians
disagree about the best way to interpret or understand their
theory of justice and institutions: Which inequalities are chosen
and which are unchosen? What form of a welfare state will best
serve justice? However, no contemporary egalitarian denies that
egalitarian justice requires a welfare state that will redistribute
income and wealth to aid the involuntarily disadvantaged.
In: The Middle East journal, Band 52, Heft 4, S. 627-628
ISSN: 0026-3141
In: The journal of political philosophy, Band 5, Heft 4, S. 327-350
ISSN: 1467-9760
In: Politics & society, Band 24, Heft 4, S. 343-351
ISSN: 1552-7514
In: Digest of Middle East studies: DOMES, Band 6, Heft 3, S. 90-91
ISSN: 1949-3606
In: Social theory and practice: an international and interdisciplinary journal of social philosophy, Band 32, Heft 4, S. 601-616
ISSN: 2154-123X
In: The journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Band 8, Heft 1, S. 45-63
ISSN: 1467-9655
With its specific combination of a bureaucratic welfare state and an open, globalized capitalist economy, Norway, along with the other Nordic countries, provides a particularly interesting context for the examination of the relationship between egalitarianism, nationalism, and racism in Europe. A racialization of difference takes place, as immigration emerges as a site for racial and racist discourse, and as a site of conjuncture between the welfare state and its citizens. By presenting an analysis of the contemporary debate on immigration in Norway, this article demonstrates how equality conceived as sameness ('imagined sameness') underpins a growing ethnification of national identity. Widely different utterances and points of view refer to metaphors of home and family life, a close link between territory and generalized kinship, and the renewed importance of Lutheran Christianity in contrast to Islam. A model of group identity and relationship is therefore suggested, in which organizational boundaries and cultural substance inflect one another, rather than being the bases of different or even opposed approaches. It is also argued that anthropologists need to take a more serious interest in the European majority populations.
In: Teoria politica: Theory of politics = Teoría politica, Band 21, Heft 3, S. 19-36
ISSN: 0394-1248
In: Irish political studies: yearbook of the Political Studies Association of Ireland, Band 18, Heft 2, S. 23-39
ISSN: 1743-9078
In: Social theory and practice: an international and interdisciplinary journal of social philosophy, Band 32, Heft 2, S. 173-189
ISSN: 2154-123X
In: The Journal of social, political and economic studies, Band 22, Heft 2, S. 252-253
ISSN: 0278-839X, 0193-5941
'Fair Shares for All: Jacobin Egalitarianism in Practice,' by Jean-Pierre Gross, is reviewed.
In: American anthropologist: AA, Band 109, Heft 2, S. 421-422
ISSN: 1548-1433
The Politics of Egalitarianism: Theory and Practice. Jacqueline Solway, ed. New York: Berghahn, 2006. 260 pp.