Suchergebnisse

The system of law enforcement bodies of Ukraine, which is a part of the executive power, by its organization and activities does not fully match the socio–political, economic and criminogenic situation in the country. The need for reform of the law enforcement system in accordance with social needs and opportunities was stressed back in the first years of independence of Ukraine and it was widely declared. Since the developed concepts of reform have not been implemented, the subject of the article is still relevant. The aim of the research is to analyze the efficiency of the processes associated with innovative strategic management during the reform of the law enforcement system of the state; to explore the main aspects and factors of reformatting, as well as the dynamics of future changes in the law enforcement structures. To achieve the goal, we applied a set of methods: comparative, structural analysis, synthesis, induction and deduction. The paper considers the process of creating the structure of the local police, which should be organized and financed by the local communities. We evaluated innovations in the personnel policy of the department: independence and transparency of the contest mechanism of filling in vacant posts (including leadership) in the police force. The paper studies the legal framework of the deployment of activities of the EU Advisory mission, which will help implement the European experience in the field of strategic management of the law enforcement system. The scientific novelty of the article is in the study of the features of the innovative strategic management of the law enforcement activities in the period of radical reform of the society. The planned reforms were developed taking into account international, including European, standards of the police activity. The practical significance of the obtained results is in a comprehensive study of the mechanism of gradual reformatting of "almighty" punitive state authority (the militia) into a new police structure that will provide services of the protection of public order to the society. Further research is advisable to focus on finding innovative ways to solve the problems of the reform of the law enforcement sphere of Ukraine.

This article studies the essence of the basic remuneration in comparison with the enforcement fee, the specifics of their collection during the formation of enforcement proceeding laws during the independence of Ukraine and their evolution into "enforcement sanction" − a common term for these two concepts introduced by the new draft law "On Enforcement of Decisions". It has been determined in the article that the basic remuneration of the private executers is collected in the manner prescribed for the collection of the enforcement fee. Therefore, the enforcement fee and the basic remuneration of the private executers are defined mostly as identical concepts. However, it is sometimes unacceptable to apply the enforcement fee rules to the basic remuneration, in particular, in the event of exemption from payment of the enforcement fee, when lien is put on property to secure claims, or when the enforcement fee is refunded due to revocation of the court order, which is confirmed at the level of judicial practice.It is summarized that the enforcement fee and the basic remuneration are, first of all, fees for decisions enforcement, and, at the same time, they serve as punishment for the debtor's failure to execute the decision voluntarily (before the enforcement document is delivered) and encourage the defender to execute the decision voluntarily without the involvement of law enforcement agencies. The article positively points out the dualistic legal nature of these funds and the preservation of this nature in the new draft law in the context of the enforcement sanction and specifies which regulation features of this nature should be improved. For instance, in the article it is considered to be appropriate to reduce the enforcement sanction, if the debtor executes the court order himself within a short period from the beginning of the order enforcement or if the enforcement document is returned or the order enforcement is terminated without actual execution. Кeywords: means of enforcement proceedings, the amount of recovery, actual execution, return of the enforcement document, termination of enforcement proceedings.

This article explores the problem of whether the enforcement of judgments belongs to civil process stage, its importance as an integral part of the process. The legislator distinguishes this stage of the process among others, which implies that enforcement proceedings are a relatively independent institution. This article calls into question such autonomy because we consider that pointless to single out a stage whose implementation is impossible without those that precede it. All stages of civil process is considered as a single system, parts of whom closely related to each other and there is no need to isolate them. In our opinion, all elements of that system – civil process stage – should be treated as one thing that exist for achieving a common goal. Judicial protection is the highest guarantee of the rights and freedoms of citizens and legal entities. It is carried out with the help of justice as a form of exercise of the judiciary, aimed at the protection and protection of civil rights and interests through the consideration and resolution of civil cases. According to the Constitution of Ukraine (hereinafter - the Constitution) everyone has the right to go to court to protect their violated rights. It can be argued that the right of such an appeal, as well as the direct examination of the case and adjudication, is a right guaranteed by the Constitution, but not fully implemented. The actual exercise of such a right occurs at the stage of execution of court decisions, and therefore the main purpose of justice is carried out. Since judicial proceedings by themselves are not characterized by the final restoration of the infringed right, it can be said that the civil right is not renewed during civil proceedings. Therefore, there is a need to distinguish enforcement proceedings not as an independent institution, but as an integral part of the civil process, the stage at which such a process ends. And despite the fact that each stage has its own functional purpose, they are all designed to protect the rights and ...

The article is devoted to the study of new question in the legal theory – enforcement technology. Enforcement technology covers two components of law enforcement: enforcement process and its result – enforcement actions. It is focused on identifying the basic components of enforcement technology concerning acts of law application. It was found that law enforcement includes the system of requirements, rules and tools, needed to create individually-legal acts. The requirements are delineated on general (value, rule of law, justice, reasonableness, appropriateness) and logical (compliance (consistency), the sequence of the text statement, coherence, and identity). To our opinion, the main emphasis should be on social direction of the acts of law application, which lies in their value for providing the rights of specific personalized entities in specific relationships and common and logical requirements should assist the specializations of such acts. It is also found that among the means of enforcement technology we should focus on those relating to the content of individually-legal act (legal structures, legal definition, legal presumptions, fictions and axioms) and its form (legal language, rules structuring, essential rules).Content tools facilitate meaningful fullness and completeness of law acts (they also provide its social orientation). Formal instead serve as an important prerequisite for the proper legal registration of the legal document. A brief description of each of signed tools is offered and the main areas of their studies exactly in the prism of properties of individually-legal acts are circumscribed. It is noted that the implementation of signed requirements and means of enforcement acts should be done according to the system of individualized for these rules. For example, today rules of structuring of enforcement decisions recognized by scholars and practitioners gained axiomatically character.Comparative analysis illustrates that lists of components of law enforcement equipment, at least formally obtained, largely correspond to elements of law-making technology. Analysing the practice of legal regulation, we can find many examples of foreign identity between them, for example, among the decrees of the President of Ukraine normative and non-normative (individually-legal) character, that obviously convince about systematical legal regulation of social relations in the modern state.The list of requirements to individually-legal acts, tools and rules of their use during the process of the creation of such acts, should be established in legislation about the normative-legal acts, today just in the sixth section «Implementation of the normative-legal acts» the draft of the Law of Ukraine «About the normative-legal acts». ; Статтю присвячено вивченню дещо нового у теорії права питання, зокрема правозастосовної техніки. Увагу зосереджено на визначенні основних компонентів право­застосовної техніки стосовно індивідуально-правових актів. З'ясовано, що правозастосовна техніка охоплює систему вимог, засобів та правил. Вимоги розмежовано на загальні (цінність, верховенство права, справедливість, обґрунтованість, доцільність) та логічні (відповідність (несуперечність), послідовність викладу тексту, узгодженість, тотожність). Встановлено, що серед засобів правозастосовної техніки необхідно акцентувати на тих, які стосуються змісту індивідуально-правового акта (юридичні конструкції, правові дефініції, правові презумпції, фікції та аксіоми) та його форми (правнича мова, правила структу­ризації, реквізитні правила). Констатовано, що ефективне використання інструментарію правозастосовної техніки можливе лише за умови наявності системи правил його використання. Такі правила повинні бути закріплені у законодавстві про правові акти, сьогодні поки що у проекті Закону України «Про нормативно-правові акти».

The article explores the issues of the victim's involvement in the process of obtaining temporary access to things and documents. The current legislative provisions were analyzed, according to it only the parties to criminal proceedings have the right to appeal to the investigating judge during the pretrial investigation or the court during the court proceedings requesting temporary access to things and documents. It is established that when a victim is not a part of the criminal proceedings, he is not empowered to apply to the investigating judge with a request for temporary access to things and documents. However, the practice of applying the law evidences about application another one approach to the solution of this issue, in particular, the existing court decisions on granting the investigative judge permission to the victim to temporary access to things and documents. This practice has led the Supreme Court to find that there is a lack of clarity, uncertainty about the legal rules regarding the victim's status and his rights in criminal proceedings, which constitutes an exclusive legal problem. In order to resolve this issue and to ensure the development of the law and the formation of a single law enforcement practice, the panel of judges concluded that it was necessary to refer the criminal proceedings to the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court. In order to resolve this problem and to ensure the development of law and the formation of a uniform law enforcement practice, the panel of judges concluded that it was necessary to refer criminal proceedings to the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court and to ask questions for clarification of the legislative provisions. On the basis of the generalized case law, it was concluded that there is no unity in approaches to granting the victim permission for temporary access to things and documents. It is concluded that the issues raised in the article are theoretical and practical issues of granting the victim permission for temporary access to things and documents which ...

The research is dedicated to the analysis of law enforcement civil aspects in legal regulation of public relations, determination of its character and value as security instrument of their effectiveness. It is set that law realization is considered in such forms as law fulfillment, law application, law enforcement, law fulfillment and law termination accompanying the motion of civil-law relations. Law enforcement legal nature is stipulated by the objective necessity to influence on the behavior of participants of such civil-law relations to ensure their compliance with the legal model. It is proved that the reason for law enforcement in the course of civil-law relations realization is such character of their development, reality and affiliation of which in view of their social value is provided individually-legal instructions given by public authority. Realization of subjective civil rights and legal obligations in private relation is provided by the acceptance of individual legal act issued by governmental authority. Law enforcement mechanism in a private law was considered whereby the combination of legal measures through which public activity of governmental authority is adjusted should be understood, which involves adjustment of civil-law relations in the course of their legal regulation, provision of stable public society development. Authority's activity in law enforcement mechanism is provided by the system of legal measures (mechanism elements), the total amount of which shall be naturally implemented in law realization mechanism the component of which is law enforcement mechanism in synchronically directed at provision of its effectiveness. To such elements of law enforcement mechanism each of which is specified within the appropriate law realization may be included: legal provision, legal relations and judicial fact.

This article is devoted to the research on the concept and features of the advocate's wrongful cooperation with law-enforcement bodies and the circumstances that influence the severity of a disciplinary penalty in the result of such cooperation. A list of certain features is given to distinguish the lawful cooperation of an advocate with law-enforcement bodies from the wrongful one, which leads to bringing the advocate to the disciplinary responsibility. The author ascertains the forms in which the wrongful cooperation of an advocate and law-enforcement bodies may occur. The article determines that law-enforcement bodies often use the information that an advocate possesses due to his/her special professional status in order to perform their functions. Besides, the article examines the possibility for an advocate to be a whistleblower under the Law of Ukraine on Prevention of Corruption. The article also analyzes the decision of the Supreme Court in the administrative case where the decision of the Higher Qualification and Disciplinary Bar Commission (HQDB) on bringing the advocate to the disciplinary responsibility and imposing a disciplinary penalty of depriving him the right to advocacy for a wrongful cooperation with law-enforcement bodies is appealed. In this research the attention is paid to the wrongdoer's arguments and the corresponding legal position of the Supreme Court which, having used the acts of the national legislation, determined advocate's actions to be illegal and denied the claimant's demands. The author defines the category of a "wrongful cooperation of an advocate with law-enforcement bodies", determines its features, and suggests the ways for improving the effectiveness of bringing wrongdoers to the disciplinary responsibility in case of such cooperation. Keywords: a disciplinary offence, a disciplinary penalty, a confidant, a whistleblower, secret investigatory (inquiry) operations, tracking measures.

International audience ; The research is dedicated to the analysis of law enforcement civil aspects in legal regulation of public relations, determination of its character and value as security instrument of their effectiveness. It is set that law realization is considered in such forms as law fulfillment, law application, law enforcement, law fulfillment and law termination accompanying the motion of civil-law relations. It is proved that the reason for law enforcement in the course of civil-law relations realization is such character of their development, reality and affiliation of which in view of their social value is provided individually-legal instructions given by public authority. Realization of subjective civil rights and legal obligations in private relation is provided by the acceptance of individual legal act issued by governmental authority. Authority's activity in law enforcement mechanism is provided by the system of legal measures (mechanism elements), the total amount of which shall be naturally implemented in law realization mechanism the component of which is law enforcement mechanism in synchronically directed at provision of its effectiveness. To such elements of law enforcement mechanism each of which is specified within the appropriate law realization may be included: legal provision, legal relations and judicial fact. ; Правозастосування в правовому регулюванні суспільних відносин є формою забезпечення сталого розвитку цивільних правовідносин в Україні. Підставою його запровадження в процесі реалізації цивільних правовідносин є такий характер їх розвитку, реальність і належність якого, в силу їх соціальної цінності, забезпечується індивідуально-правовим приписом органу публічної влади. Він проявляється в разі необхідності державного впливу на розвиток цивільних правовідносин з метою забезпечення суспільного інтересу. Втілення його в життя забезпечується механізмом правового регулювання.Механізм правового регулювання складається з окремих складових частин, які забезпечують його ...

The problem of research and, consequently, the standardization of law enforcement terminology as a system, aimed to meet the requirements of both police officers and citizens of Ukraine have arisen in connection with the modern transformation of law enforcement authorities from a militarized structure to an administrative and legal one, and their fixation on European standards. Taking into account the number of scientific studies, concentrated on paradigmatic relations in different term systems, scholars have never focused their attention exactly on law-enforcement terminology as a system with characteristic paradigmatic relations, which is the relevance of researches in this direction. The aim of the scientific study is to identify and explore paradigmatic relations in the system of modern Ukrainian law enforcement terminology as a strategy for its standardization. During the analysis of terminological material, it has been identified that the paradigmatic links in Ukrainian law enforcement terminology reflect the stages of formation and development of law enforcement corpus of terms as a system. It has been noted that a characteristic feature of Ukrainian law enforcement terminology is the existence of a considerable number of terms from other humanitarian spheres, in particular jurisprudence, military science and medicine. This leads to paradigmatic relations as such, arising between words and groups of words on the basis of the similarity or opposition of their meanings (synonymy, antonymy, hyper-hyponymy, etc.). Scholars have different perceptions of the range of problems provided in the terminology science as it is evidenced by numerous debates that have both categorical denial and justification of stylistic conditionality. The main directions of standardization of Ukrainian law enforcement terminology have been offered as a new transformed system, in particular the elimination of loan translations from Russian, the prevention of borrowings and the creation of a national system of terms, most accurately representing object and subject mutual relations, and current activity of law enforcement system of Ukraine. This will lead to the further formation of a qualitatively new policing authority, intended to protect the rights and interests of Ukrainian citizens on the principles of transparency and accessibility ; Аналіз термінологійних наукових праць дав можливість виявити, що українська правоохоронна терміносистема (УПТ) в аспекті парадигматичних відношень ще не вивчалася. Парадигматичні зв'язки (синонімія, антонімія, паронімія) в УПТ відображають етапи становлення й розвитку правоохоронного термінологійного корпусу. Запропоновано основні напрями унормування УПТ як нової трансформованої системи, що зумовить подальше формування якісно нового поліційного органу, покликаного захищати права та інтереси громадян України на засадах прозорості й доступності.

The article is devoted to the peculiarities of public administration features formation in the conditions of strategic changes. The article focuses on the law enforcement agencies' role in public administration in Ukraine. The main directions of public administration improvement within the framework of European integration reform are considered. Public administration development stages within the framework of state-public relations are determined. The content and state's law-enforcement function peculiarities are analyzed. Due to major socio-political changes, the importance to develop and implement fundamentally new approaches to state's law-enforcement function implementation is proved. The consequences of law-enforcement function limitation by legal forms and active use of illegal content forms are analyzed. Firstly, it covers a wide range of public relations and processes through law enforcement activities. Secondly, it promotes non-governmental organizations and citizens involvement in law-enforcement process. Thirdly, it reflects the objective pattern inherent in the rule of law. The law enforcement agencies' role of a democratic state in law enforcement process is investigated. The law-enforcement agencies are regarded as public authorities empowered to monitor compliance with legislation in a particular defined area of law, to use coercion to enforce their tasks. The content of state's law-enforcement bodies, their organization and activity determined by law, is revealed. The current problems of administrative decision preparation and organization of law-enforcement activity, in particular anti-corruption, are considered. The public administration elements in relation to each law-enforcement anti-corruption activity entities are considered. ; Стаття присвячена особливостям формування ознак публічного управління в умовах стратегічних змін. У статті спрямовано увагу на роль правоохоронних органів при здійсненні публічного управління в Україні. Розглянуто основні напрями вдосконалення публічного управління в межах євроінтеграційної реформи. Визначено етапи процесу розвитку публічного управління в рамках державно-суспільних відносин. Проаналізовано зміст і особливості правоохоронної функції держави. Зазначено, що в умовах значних соціально-політичних змін актуалізується потреба розробки й втілення принципово нових підходів до реалізації правоохоронної функції держави. Зауважено, що подолання обмеженості здійснення правоохоронної функції виключно правовими формами і активне застосування форм неправового змісту, по-перше, дає змогу охопити правоохоронною діяльністю гранично широке коло суспільних відносин і процесів; по-друге, сприяє залученню до правоохорони недержавних організацій і громадян; по-третє, відображає об'єктивну закономірність, характерну для діяльності правової держави. Досліджено роль правоохоронних органів демократичної держави в забезпеченні правопорядку. Правоохоронні органи розглянуто як державні органи, уповноважені на здійснення контролю за дотриманням законодавства у певній визначеній галузі права, застосування примусу для забезпечення виконання поставлених перед ними завдань. Розкрито зміст правоохоронних органів держави, організація і порядок діяльності яких визначаються законом. Розглядаються актуальні проблеми підготовки та організації управлінських рішень сфери правоохоронної діяльності, зокрема антикорупційної. Розглянуто елементи публічного управління відносно кожного з суб'єктів правоохоронної діяльності антикорупційного значення.

The article is devoted to the peculiarities of public administration features formation in the conditions of strategic changes. The article focuses on the law enforcement agencies' role in public administration in Ukraine. The main directions of public administration improvement within the framework of European integration reform are considered. Public administration development stages within the framework of state-public relations are determined. The content and state's law-enforcement function peculiarities are analyzed. Due to major socio-political changes, the importance to develop and implement fundamentally new approaches to state's law-enforcement function implementation is proved. The consequences of law-enforcement function limitation by legal forms and active use of illegal content forms are analyzed. Firstly, it covers a wide range of public relations and processes through law enforcement activities. Secondly, it promotes non-governmental organizations and citizens involvement in law-enforcement process. Thirdly, it reflects the objective pattern inherent in the rule of law. The law enforcement agencies' role of a democratic state in law enforcement process is investigated. The law-enforcement agencies are regarded as public authorities empowered to monitor compliance with legislation in a particular defined area of law, to use coercion to enforce their tasks. The content of state's law-enforcement bodies, their organization and activity determined by law, is revealed. The current problems of administrative decision preparation and organization of law-enforcement activity, in particular anti-corruption, are considered. The public administration elements in relation to each law-enforcement anti-corruption activity entities are considered. ; Стаття присвячена особливостям формування ознак публічного управління в умовах стратегічних змін. У статті спрямовано увагу на роль правоохоронних органів при здійсненні публічного управління в Україні. Розглянуто основні напрями вдосконалення публічного управління в межах євроінтеграційної реформи. Визначено етапи процесу розвитку публічного управління в рамках державно-суспільних відносин. Проаналізовано зміст і особливості правоохоронної функції держави. Зазначено, що в умовах значних соціально-політичних змін актуалізується потреба розробки й втілення принципово нових підходів до реалізації правоохоронної функції держави. Зауважено, що подолання обмеженості здійснення правоохоронної функції виключно правовими формами і активне застосування форм неправового змісту, по-перше, дає змогу охопити правоохоронною діяльністю гранично широке коло суспільних відносин і процесів; по-друге, сприяє залученню до правоохорони недержавних організацій і громадян; по-третє, відображає об'єктивну закономірність, характерну для діяльності правової держави. Досліджено роль правоохоронних органів демократичної держави в забезпеченні правопорядку. Правоохоронні органи розглянуто як державні органи, уповноважені на здійснення контролю за дотриманням законодавства у певній визначеній галузі права, застосування примусу для забезпечення виконання поставлених перед ними завдань. Розкрито зміст правоохоронних органів держави, організація і порядок діяльності яких визначаються законом. Розглядаються актуальні проблеми підготовки та організації управлінських рішень сфери правоохоронної діяльності, зокрема антикорупційної. Розглянуто елементи публічного управління відносно кожного з суб'єктів правоохоронної діяльності антикорупційного значення.

The article is devoted to the peculiarities of public administration features formation in the conditions of strategic changes. The article focuses on the law enforcement agencies' role in public administration in Ukraine. The main directions of public administration improvement within the framework of European integration reform are considered. Public administration development stages within the framework of state-public relations are determined. The content and state's law-enforcement function peculiarities are analyzed. Due to major socio-political changes, the importance to develop and implement fundamentally new approaches to state's law-enforcement function implementation is proved. The consequences of law-enforcement function limitation by legal forms and active use of illegal content forms are analyzed. Firstly, it covers a wide range of public relations and processes through law enforcement activities. Secondly, it promotes non-governmental organizations and citizens involvement in law-enforcement process. Thirdly, it reflects the objective pattern inherent in the rule of law. The law enforcement agencies' role of a democratic state in law enforcement process is investigated. The law-enforcement agencies are regarded as public authorities empowered to monitor compliance with legislation in a particular defined area of law, to use coercion to enforce their tasks. The content of state's law-enforcement bodies, their organization and activity determined by law, is revealed. The current problems of administrative decision preparation and organization of law-enforcement activity, in particular anti-corruption, are considered. The public administration elements in relation to each law-enforcement anti-corruption activity entities are considered. ; Стаття присвячена особливостям формування ознак публічного управління в умовах стратегічних змін. У статті спрямовано увагу на роль правоохоронних органів при здійсненні публічного управління в Україні. Розглянуто основні напрями вдосконалення публічного управління в межах євроінтеграційної реформи. Визначено етапи процесу розвитку публічного управління в рамках державно-суспільних відносин. Проаналізовано зміст і особливості правоохоронної функції держави. Зазначено, що в умовах значних соціально-політичних змін актуалізується потреба розробки й втілення принципово нових підходів до реалізації правоохоронної функції держави. Зауважено, що подолання обмеженості здійснення правоохоронної функції виключно правовими формами і активне застосування форм неправового змісту, по-перше, дає змогу охопити правоохоронною діяльністю гранично широке коло суспільних відносин і процесів; по-друге, сприяє залученню до правоохорони недержавних організацій і громадян; по-третє, відображає об'єктивну закономірність, характерну для діяльності правової держави. Досліджено роль правоохоронних органів демократичної держави в забезпеченні правопорядку. Правоохоронні органи розглянуто як державні органи, уповноважені на здійснення контролю за дотриманням законодавства у певній визначеній галузі права, застосування примусу для забезпечення виконання поставлених перед ними завдань. Розкрито зміст правоохоронних органів держави, організація і порядок діяльності яких визначаються законом. Розглядаються актуальні проблеми підготовки та організації управлінських рішень сфери правоохоронної діяльності, зокрема антикорупційної. Розглянуто елементи публічного управління відносно кожного з суб'єктів правоохоронної діяльності антикорупційного значення.

The article deals with the analysis of the concept of the enforcement of judgments as the manifestation of differentiation of the executive procedural form. It is stipulated that the executive procedural form in the execution of court decisions and decisions of other authorities is not the same for all enforcement proceedings. The executor and other participants of the enforcement proceeding perform different functions in the enforcement proceeding. It is suggested that in the enforcement process the measures for the enforcement of judgment, stipulated by the legislation on enforcement proceedings are the most striking manifestation of the executive procedural form. In legal studies the concept of the measures for the enforcement of judgments remains controversial. The author distinguishes three approaches to understanding of this concept, he calls them substantive-legal, substantive-procedural and procedural. According to the substantive-legal approach, measures for enforcement of judgments are a sanction for non-compliance. Under the substantive-procedural approach, measures for the enforcement of judgments are the means of implementation of sanctions. Based on the procedural approach, measures for enforcement of judgments are considered as a set of procedural actions to enforce the decision. It is concluded that each of these approaches is justified and all of them together characterize the measures for enforcement of judgments as a multifaceted phenomenon. The article focuses on more detailed analysis on the enforcement of judgments in procedural sense. It is proved that the measures for the enforcement of judgments are a category that differentiates the executive procedural form. These measures are a certain procedural pattern of enforcement, a distinct set of procedural actions, connected with the enforcement of different decisions. Every writ of execution should be performed within the frames of a certain measure for the enforcement of judgments. As the result of the research the author formulates his own definitions of the measures for the enforcement of judgments.

The article has analyzed the principles which are the basis for settlement of the dispute with participation of judge. Personal arguments regarding reasonableness of closed meetings as a certain form of the procedure for settlement of the dispute with participation of judge have been provided. The authors have concluded that this institute is out of civil procedure. The authors focus on problematic aspects which prevent achievement of efficiency due to the use of the settlement of dispute with participation of judge. Besides, authors draw attention to the lack of special training for the national judges, necessary special training and selection of judges who will become mediators. Reasonableness and negative consequences for a judge who combines settlement procedures with performance of main duties have been analyzed. The author has distinguished between the settlement of the dispute with participation of judge and mediation procedure. Conclusion about differences have been made. The article provides proposals to amendments civil procedure legislation. The authors propose to choose the model of voluntary mediation in the court when this procedure is possible with the consent of parties. Personal opinion on implementation of the institute of the judge-mediator, special registry of these judges, introduction of professional education and selection of these persons has been provided. Besides, it has been concluded that some restrictions should be introduced regarding combination of mediation procedures and main professional obligations by the judge. Moreover, necessity to abolish temporary restrictions for procedure of settling the dispute with participation of judge to avoid excessive formalism and fast decision on the case has been underlined.

The article presents an analysis of the legal basis for implementing the law enforcement function of the state in the economic sphere, Ukraine's entry into the single European economic and political space. The importance of the law enforcement function of the state in the sphere of Ukraine's economy in the context of legal regulation, which is directly related to the sovereignty and protection of national interests, is analyzed. Legal regulation of the economy should be carried out in two priority areas: regulatory consolidation of acceptable mechanisms that develop as a result of natural economic laws; economic development to achieve the interests of the state and society in the context of European integration. The directions of improvement of legal regulation of the economic sphere of Ukraine are offered, namely: improvement of the normative-legal base of realization of the system of measures of financial safety maintenance; effective legal regulation of economic relations; compliance with the provisions adopted by the legislation of Ukraine in the field of prevention of corruption violations; ensuring fair competition, supporting entrepreneurship and others.