Suchergebnisse

The subject of research are theoretical aspects of one of system factors of тінізації of public relations, foremost power, on the basis of influence of modern neoimperialism that provides the pressure facilities of formation of parallel shadow pseudoreality. The purpose of the study is to identify the essence of the influence of modern neo–imperialism, its specific means of non–imperialist politics through the formation of a parallel shadow pseudo–reality. Methods of research. The work used a set of scientific methods and approaches, including systemic, structural, functional, historical, logical, which allowed to ensure the conceptual unity of research on the historical conditions of the formation of shadow power. Results of the work. The article identifies methodological approaches to the study of the reasons for the systemic shadowing of social relations in dependent countries, confirming the hypothesis of the formation of a parallel shadow pseudo–reality of neo–imperialism as a means of new domination. Application of results. The system of sciences from the family of public administration, a wide range of methodological aspects of socio–economic, legal sciences on the problems of dysfunctional development of power. Conclusions. The main results of the study, their theoretical results should be reduced to the following conclusions: 1) parallel shadow pseudo–reality in modern conditions is a powerful means of shadow pressure on the societies of dependent countries, their shadowing; 2) the formation of shadow pseudo–reality as a system of means of modern neo–imperialism is a means of total disorientation of the authorities and society in dependent countries; 3) in modern conditions, the characteristic features of the physical and discursive modes of neo–imperialist influence have been significantly expanded.

In his paper "The Problem of Domination by Reason and its Non-Relativist Solution" Oskari Kuusela describes a problem about our conception of rationality, which he labels the problem of "domination by reason". This problem has contributed to generate, Kuusela notes, a widespread dissatisfaction with reason, which has resulted in a tendency to discard ideals of rationality altogether. Kuusela, in his paper, provides a response to this dissatisfaction. He argues that Wittgenstein, if we read him correctly, exemplifies a conception of reason that doesn't incur the problem he indicates. In my response, I suggest a possible extension of Kuusela's reflections. Domination by reason, as I argue, may also take another form, different from the one recognized by Kuusela. This alternative form is interesting for two reasons. First, those concerned about rationality's dominance have quite often in mind this latter problem. Second, it is not obvious that the alternative version of the problem can be solved by appealing to the conception of rationality Kuusela locates in Wittgenstein: it could even be argued that such a conception, on a certain construal, may contribute to reinforcing it. I suggest that, if we focus solely on the aspects of Wittgenstein's method highlighted in Kuusela's paper, then such methods may be taken to promote domination by reason (in the alternative sense I introduce). There are, however, other aspects of Wittgenstein's philosophy - most notably, his conception of ethical language - which may help us to dispel this version of the problem.
Keywords: Wittgenstein, rationality, modernity, clarification, James Baldwin

Through the study of chancellor Kaunitz's efforts to bring French theater to Vienna, which was briefly successful first between 1752 and 1765 and later between 1768 and 1772, this article reconsiders the notion of a "French Europe," whereby French culture dominated eighteenth-century Europe. In traditional diffusionist historiography, the arrow points outward from the center (France) toward the periphery (Europe). Focusing on Vienna, however, offers a different perspective, displacing France as the central hub of action. French theater in Vienna underwent a thorough process of selection and adaptation according to the various purposes it served. Analysis of the situation in Vienna reveals the complex patterns of circulation traced by French actors as they traveled both domestically and across the continent. Instead of analyzing "transnational" literary circulation quantitavely as a mere flow of merchandise, this article advocates an alternative approach, at once pragmatic and contextual, that emphasizes the political decisions that presided over it.

International audience ; The public reason, expressing itself in a deliberative process in order to reach a consensus, has become an unavoidable practice in the contemporary democracies. The purpose of this article is to criticize the homogenization that these practices produce in the public space. A space in which consensus, instead of promoting citizen's participation and an independence from the State, creates invisible forms of domination. It does so by transforming the participation into a collaborative mechanism with the social management policies developed by the State. ; La raison publique, s'exprimant à travers des formes délibératives ayant comme but la recherche du consensus, est devenue une pratique incontournable des systèmes démocratiques contemporains. Il s'agit à travers cet article d'élaborer une critique de l'homogénéisation que cette pratique produit au sein de l'espace public. Un espace où le consensus, au lieu de favoriser une participation des citoyens et une indépendance par rapport à l'État, engendre des formes invisibles de domination en faisant de la participation un mécanisme de collaboration avec les politiques de gestion du social développées par l'État.