Suchergebnisse

This article looks at research into comparative patterns of
promotion of men and women in Australia. The study was by interview and
looked at equal numbers of men and women in medium to large
organisations. A number of the findings were contrary to prevalent
myths, e.g. both men and women were prepared to play games of corporate
politics. Some women saw being too outspoken as a hindrance to promotion
but more women saw their success as due to their own performance, while
men were more likely to put it down to luck. In general there were more
similarities than differences in patterns of promotion and perceived
factors that help or hinder.

An Australian study interviewed 50 women and men middle and senior managers about the factors they perceived as important in their promotion in management. A major finding was the similarity between the profiles of female and male managers although female managers averaged fewer promotions. Helping factors, perceived similarly by both female and male managers were: coaching by others, past training and experience, personal skill and positive work attitudes. Male managers mentioned luck as a factor in promotion more than the female managers. "Having a career plan" was not an important factor and few of the managers had firm plans for the next five years. Greater variability was found in the factors perceived to hinder promotional progress. The findings are discussed considering the popular advice offered to emergent managers by self‐help books, researchers and consultants.

It has generally been accepted that boys and girls differ in their behavioral and emotional responses to stressful family events. These gender differences could be due to either different family risk factors affecting boys and girls or to boys coping differently in response to the same negative family events. These two alternative hypotheses form the basis of our analysis. Specifically, using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY), we assess whether and how (1) marital discord, (2) marital stability and change, (3) harsh discipline, and (4) maternal deviance impact three different outcomes for males and females: delinquency, alcohol use, and depression. Multivariate analyses reveal that, although females generally display more vulnerabilities to specific dimensions of family life than males, the responses to these risk factors are not constrained to gender‐stereotypic outcomes.

Treating self-injurious behavior (SIB) is a challenge in any environment. There is an increased level of complexity when this type of behavior occurs in a female correctional facility. This article focuses on SIB in incarcerated women, including the importance of identifying risk factors, understanding the psychological functions of SIB, addressing the influence of gender on treatment, and acknowledging challenges unique to the correctional environment. Treatment recommendations specific to incarcerated females, such as motivational interviewing and a cognitive behavioral approach, provide guidance to address the underlying causes of SIB and the development of healthier coping behaviors for female inmates. Effective management of SIB in a female correctional facility simultaneously reduces the burden on staff and increases the safety of staff and inmates.