Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
4626 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: From Global Poverty to Global Equality, S. 237-266
In: Journal of international relations and development, Band 11, Heft 1, S. 1-28
ISSN: 1581-1980
In: CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP11812
SSRN
Working paper
In: HKS Working Paper No. RWP17-003
SSRN
Working paper
In: From Global Poverty to Global Equality, S. 195-229
In: Journal of international relations and development: JIRD, official journal of the Central and East European International Studies Association, Band 11, Heft 1, S. 1-28
ISSN: 1408-6980
SSRN
Working paper
From Global Poverty to Global Equality provides a philosophical exploration of some of the central questions in the flourishing debate on global justice: Do we have a duty to help eradicate global poverty? Do we also have a duty to pursue global equality? What makes such demands morally justifiable?.
In: Ethics & global politics, Band 4, Heft 1, S. 51-69
ISSN: 1654-6369
In: Social philosophy & policy, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 143-168
ISSN: 1471-6437
Philosophers have long distinguished various interpretations of the principle of equal opportunity and argued over their implications and justifications. But they have almost always tacitly assumed that the context was a national one. They have not, in particular, considered whether some interpretation of the principle could apply and be justified globally, that is, to all people without regard to their nationality or citizenship. Yet, such an investigation is clearly demanded. The leading moral theories seem to support a case for at least some interpretation of the equal opportunity principle, and it is not obvious that they can support it only domestically.Consider, first, those moral theories which place great value on negative liberty, for example, libertarianism. Libertarianism supports a standard interpretation of the equal opportunity principle – "formal" equality of opportunity; formal equality of opportunity requires that legal restrictions j on the taking of opportunities be lifted, and such restrictions diminish negative liberty. But libertarianism would also seem to support a global. version of formal equality of opportunity, for example, that laws be rescinded which require that candidates for jobs in a country be citizens of that country, or which restrict emigration or immigration. Such laws also diminish negative liberty.Or consider those moral theories which place great value on efficiency, for example, utilitarianism. Utilitarianism probably supports formal equality of opportunity because legal restrictions on the taking of opportunity not only diminish negative liberty, but also often prevent talent and skill from going where it can best be used and thus reduce efficiency.
In: From Global Poverty to Global Equality, S. 163-186
In: The journal of political philosophy, Band 18, Heft 3, S. 313-334
ISSN: 1467-9760
In: Journal of Political Philosophy, Forthcoming
SSRN
In: The journal of political philosophy, Band 18, Heft 3, S. 313-335
ISSN: 0963-8016