Suchergebnisse

The article discusses the role and place of the marshal of nobility in the system of county administration and self-government in the post-reform period. The object of the study is the institute of county marshals of nobility in the Belarusian provinces in the second half of the 19th – early 20th century. The study deterncines the changes in the government policy of the Russian autocracy related to the noble elections in Belarus after the 1863–1864 uprising. The main functions of County leaders in the sphere of class self-government are revealed. The main directions of activity of local heads of nobility in management of administrative district institutions are shown. The characteristics of the functioning of the institute of county marshals of nobility on the territory of Belarus are given. As a result of analysis of the laws the conclusion is made that the marshal of the nobility took the place of a full head of county, and during the period under review, the trend of expanding the powers of the marshals of nobility, testified to their transformation from in-class bodies in administrative, public bodies.

The author of this article relies on the premise that strategic management is the highest function of any government, with it being implemented by government bodies through a system of government strategic planning, as well as a specific type of administrative activity – developing and executing strategies, as well as national projects and programs. In essence strategies are normatively burdened formalized priorities, goals and tasks associated with the development of Russia and its regions in the long term. These strategies are meant to be an effective means of implementing relevant government policy, to serve as a source of compromise for society and to ensure purposeful action when it comes to a multitude of social subjects cooperating with each other in order to attain the results in mind. You can tell that there is a problem in organizing government strategic management by the fact that we are dealing with a constant increase in territorial disproportions in the socio-economic, socio-cultural development of Russia's cities and regions, as well as the population's indifference towards strategies, federal and regional projects. Among the factors which limit government bodies' capacity to execute plans for social development is a multitude of various systems of social management in place on a regional and municipal level which do not allow for implementing linear correlations when it comes to administration. Furthermore, internal determination is a factor in developing territorially localized communities, which is when the behavior of any given social group is defined not so much by external factors or administrative pressure, but rather by the actual nature of internal relationships, by recollection of past situations, rules of cooperation for social subjects, life plans and life strategies of individuals and social groups. Solving the problem of organizing government strategic planning systems and ensuring control over the course of Russian society's development is linked, in the author's opinion, to revealing those social factors and phenomena which define how appropriate certain innovations are for any given local community, figure out whether the planned results are achievable on a regional level, and to choosing such methods of administrative pressure that the social group in question will be susceptible to. Based on the empirical data, the author of this article argues that there is a connection between the population's attitude towards the system of government strategic management and a region's level of development (according to Nikolai Lapin's classification), while insisting that the differentiation of regions based on their level of modernization is vital information when it comes to differentiating structures and functions of government bodies in regards to strategic planning and choosing regulative mechanisms (from management and handling resources to normative-value and institutional management).

In this article, the author considers the problems associated with the modern formulation and implementation of the principle of unity of public authorities, state and municipal. Particular attention is paid to the latently existing public authority and the changes that need to be made to regional and federal legislation. The emphasis is on the implementation of social values and guidelines for the principles of organization of state and municipal authorities at different stages of state building. Based on the varying principles of Soviet and modern, it is shown that there is a lot of invariable characterizing the identity of Russian society. The search for unifying principles of interaction is submitted for discussion - the unity of public interests, based not on the principle of supremacy, but on the basis of weighing dierent interests, that is, ndinga balance between the conficting state and municipal. Such an approach will allow us to renew our perception through a synthesis of what is permissible, what is desired, and what should be.

The article includes a generalized description of the approaches and methods in
state regulation of the processes of attracting foreign labor force, that implemented
by developed countries. The author identifies a number of objective factors causing
the necessity for active government intervention in migration process, examines tasks
and system of functional elements in the process of migration management in
developed countries. The article also reflects special features of Russian national
experience of state regulation of external labor migration in the 1990s and 2000s.

Article about system essence of social contradictions between a society and the power inevitably arising at level of municipal management. On the basis of V. Pareto heritage and the theory of self-organising of I. Prigozhin the author analyzes deep problems of formation of a civil society in Russia.

Guidelines contain recommendations for the implementation of independent works by discipline "Local government and social work" for students specialty "Social work", seminar plans, control questions, topics reports and abstracts and the bibliography for each theme.

The author of the article carried out a comprehensive analysis of the development of "e-government" in the context of the development of new state management. Factors affecting the formation and development of e-government in Russia have been identified. It is argued that the use of technologies and tools of e-government makes the process of public administration more open and efficient.

The aim of this paper is to contribute to research on the role of elite networks in democracies. The specific research topic is an attempt to measure (for the first time) the influence of different elite networks on U.S. government administrations from 1901 to 2021. The strategy is based on the identification of U.S. government officials, who were also members of secret elite networks during their time in office. To this end, each government position received an influence value based on its importance. If an official in this position was also a member of an elite network, then the influence of the position is counted towards the influence of the network. The total influence of a network is divided by the total influence of all government positions in order to receive its relative influence score in a given administration. The results show that Freemasons had a strong influence on most U.S. governments until 1953, whereas the Anglo-American Network, with its most prominent arm, the Council on Foreign Relations, became the dominant force from Eisenhower onward. Only Nixon's first cabinet and Donald Trump constituted exceptions thereafter, relying less heavily on this network. The implication of this study is that it is impossible to understand American history or World history in the last 120 years without also analyzing the role and interests of elite networks, given their consistent and surprisingly high level of influence, as revealed by this study.

In this paper we consider the role of government as a state owner and
public relations manager, as well as we consider the contradictions that arise from
the interaction of these two roles between business and government.

Статья посвящена исследованию современной российской и международной практикам криптографической защиты информации в системе электронного правительства. В данной статье рассмотрены основные направления работы государственной информационной системы (ГИС), реализуемой в рамках проекта «Цифровое правительство» и предложена возможность использования биометрии, как дополнения к степени надежности криптографической защиты информации.

Purpose: define dominant trends of interaction of business and government.
Methodology. The main empirical research method is the content-analysis of
the regional press.
Results. Determined dominant trends of interaction of business and
government and trends of interaction, dependant on circumstances, described a
number of their characteristics.

Purpose: define structure and mechanisms of interaction between business and
government.
Methodology. The empirical research method is the expert interviews. Results. The article describes three areas of interaction between business and
the government. The White area refers to legal practices. Interaction within the
White Area exists on two tiers: macrostructural and the level of individual
organizations. Interaction within the Gray area exists on the micro level and the level
of individual organizations. Interaction within the Black area exists on the micro
level. Paper describes 7 groups of mechanisms of interaction between business and
the government.

Based on the formation of innovative clusters and ecosystems in Russia, the network organization and system principles for transforming the relationship between the state and innovative business are considered. The focus focuses on the formation of innovation clusters and ecosystems as collaborative communities, the transition to a "cluster management organization" as a new advanced form of organization of the innovation process, as well as government policy to support such a transition along with government and business relations in this context.