Suchergebnisse

For a long time, despite the stakes, neither the National Assembly nor the Senate regulated the exercise of the representation of interests within them. This lack of regulation did not mean that lobbying was conducted outside of any legal framework. Article 27 of the Constitution provides that "any imperative mandate is void" while the new Penal Code sanctions breaches of probity. At the same time, public relations companies in search of a better image have decided to draft their own ethical charters. Since then, the situation has changed. From now on, the National Assembly and the Senate regulate the activities of lobbying. While these regulations have the merit of existing, they remain insufficient. Indeed, the mechanisms in force have not made it possible to achieve the expected objectives. Therefore, an evolution and a harmonization of the regulations seem essential. The subject of my thesis would be the elaboration of a common system and a new register which would be compulsory and would present a more detailed typology of the representatives of interests to the two chambers of Parliament, local authorities, public administrations and to departments where opportunities for influence remain important. ; Pendant longtemps, malgré les enjeux, ni l'Assemblée Nationale ni le Sénat ne réglementaient l'exercice de la représentation d'intérêts en leur sein. Cette absence de réglementation ne signifiait pas pour autant que le lobbying s'exerçait en dehors de tout cadre juridique. L'article 27 de la Constitution dispose que « tout mandat impératif est nul » tandis que le nouveau Code pénal sanctionne les atteintes à la probité. Parallèlement, des sociétés de relations publiques en quête d'une meilleure image ont décidé de rédiger leurs propres chartes déontologiques. Depuis, la situation a évolué. Désormais, l'Assemblée Nationale et le Sénat réglementent les activités de lobbying. Si ces réglementations ont le mérite d'exister, elles demeurent toutefois insuffisantes. En effet, les dispositifs en vigueur n'ont pas ...

For a long time, despite the stakes, neither the National Assembly nor the Senate regulated the exercise of the representation of interests within them. This lack of regulation did not mean that lobbying was conducted outside of any legal framework. Article 27 of the Constitution provides that "any imperative mandate is void" while the new Penal Code sanctions breaches of probity. At the same time, public relations companies in search of a better image have decided to draft their own ethical charters. Since then, the situation has changed. From now on, the National Assembly and the Senate regulate the activities of lobbying. While these regulations have the merit of existing, they remain insufficient. Indeed, the mechanisms in force have not made it possible to achieve the expected objectives. Therefore, an evolution and a harmonization of the regulations seem essential. The subject of my thesis would be the elaboration of a common system and a new register which would be compulsory and would present a more detailed typology of the representatives of interests to the two chambers of Parliament, local authorities, public administrations and to departments where opportunities for influence remain important. ; Pendant longtemps, malgré les enjeux, ni l'Assemblée Nationale ni le Sénat ne réglementaient l'exercice de la représentation d'intérêts en leur sein. Cette absence de réglementation ne signifiait pas pour autant que le lobbying s'exerçait en dehors de tout cadre juridique. L'article 27 de la Constitution dispose que « tout mandat impératif est nul » tandis que le nouveau Code pénal sanctionne les atteintes à la probité. Parallèlement, des sociétés de relations publiques en quête d'une meilleure image ont décidé de rédiger leurs propres chartes déontologiques. Depuis, la situation a évolué. Désormais, l'Assemblée Nationale et le Sénat réglementent les activités de lobbying. Si ces réglementations ont le mérite d'exister, elles demeurent toutefois insuffisantes. En effet, les dispositifs en vigueur n'ont pas ...

Activation of the processes on globalization and national economic space regionalization actualizes the problem of formation of an effective mechanism for managing the regional socio-economic system, the availability of which ensures effective use of available resources, creates prerequisites for the formation and implementation of the competitive potential of a territorial entity, and is a necessary prerequisite for neutralizing the consequences of global and local crises. The level of sustainable functioning of regional socio-economic systems is a key factor affecting the socioeconomic development of the Russian economy in the face of increasing uncertainty in the external environment. This requires new approaches to identify tools for new governmental management at the meso level, to developing new forms and models for sustainable socio-economic development of regions. The paper substantiates the thesis that the necessary condition for the implementation of sustainable development of the regional economic system is the presence of adapters in its elements that provide a certain quality of management decisions. Regional development is aimed at achieving a set of parameters that meet the needs of economic agents: residents and non-residents of the regional economy, subject to feasibility of management decision, compliance with strategic guidelines for regional development and reducing agency costs. At the same time, regional development is interpreted as the result of structural changes (the synthesis of structure and processes) in the system of interaction between subjects of socioeconomic relations at the meso level, and controlling is considered as a tool for effective management of innovation changes

In the article the causes and conditions of preservation of absenteeism in Russia and foreign countries as a factor of modern democracy are analyzed, the necessity of introduction of compulsory voting in elections, educating at the citizens of responsibility for the formation of public authority mechanism is substantiated. ; В статье анализируются причины и условия сохранения абсентеизма в России и зарубежных государствах как фактора современной демократии, обосновывается необходимость введения обязательного голосования на выборах, воспитания у граждан ответственности за формирование публично-властного механизма.

Introduction. Interest is a complex transformational category, whose role in the modern economic system is difficult to overestimate. The development of economic interests is a stimulating factor for economic change, the development of markets, the emergence of new industries, sectors of the economy. Interest is the basis for the formation of the needs of the population, enterprises, the state and other components of market relations. Due to interests and their transformations, technologies are being developed, innovations are introduced, scientific and technological progress is stimulated, and the structure and connections in the market are changing. Interest is at the heart of choice and decision making.The purpose of the article is to outline the scientific essence of economic interests, their role in cluster formation and harmonization of economic development.Methods used in the article: theoretical analysis and synthesis of the test material, scientific abstraction, social and qualitative research methods.Results The internal specificity of regional economic and market development tends to change the priorities and vectors of forming economic interests. Changes in their nature and structure are characteristic of the period of transformational transformations and unpredictable development of the economic situation.Economic interests are directly related to the economic development of the region and can create preconditions, identify trends and shape its prospects. Effectiveness of economic interests, their effectiveness, that is, that directly embodied in concrete steps for their realization is determined by two mandatory conditions of influence (power) of economic interests on the development of the economy in the region at a certain period of time: a single vector; totality (mass).Harmonious regional development, which is an effective combination of interests in the main spheres of social life (social, economic, political, etc.), can be both a consequence of the implementation of the economic interests of clusterization and their motive. Currently, application of managerial approaches based on the definition of the motive (strategic goal), on which all other decisions are based, are relevant. We define this path as perspective and justified from the point of view of modern science in order to achieve the harmonious development of the territory through the adoption of appropriate economic, in particular cluster solutions.The originality of the article is to formulate a modern definition of the category of economic interests, to specify their properties and characteristics in order to become an effective management tool in the harmonization of regional economic development.provisions set out in the article are grounds for forming the following conclusions:1) for the active orientation of the regional economy to cluster formation, studies of economic interests, their features and characteristics in the modern transformational economic system are necessary;2) strategic objectives, such as harmonization of regional development, must be justified by transparent projects and simple arguments in order to ensure that the interests of the participants are massive and have a single direction;3) the justification is the driving force of interests, as well as the assessment of risks and the probability of their occurrence. In order to achieve clustering goals, special attention should be paid to studying the power of participants and the evaluation of inhibitory factors;4) As an element of governance, economic interests are a very volatile category, therefore, at all managerial stages, it is necessary to create supportive and new interests (motives) to encourage participants to achieve their goal.Conclusion. The prospect of further research is to substantiate new properties and characteristics of economic interests as a management tool. The selection of mobile and non-mobile groups of economic interests highlights the relevant directions of further research relevant to the current state of the economic system.

The paper presents the organization as a collaboration of multiple and diverse constituencies and interests, referred to as stakeholders. Stakeholder view of the organization integrates stakeholder relationships within a company's resource base, industry setting, and sociopolitical arena into a single analytical framework. Although it is not that difficult to envision a stakeholder focus in running a business, it is exceedingly difficult to implement such a focus. The key relationships for a business go far beyond the relationships with its customers to include the relationships with its employees, as well as those with suppliers and partners, investors and market analysts, and even government regulators, trade associations and other entities that influence the general business climate in which a given business operates. The paper introduces an integrated strategy for building a network of collaborative stakeholder relationships based on fundamental shift in management philosophy and attention. Singular needs and interests of stockholders are replaced by a focus on understanding and balancing the interests of all company's key stakeholders. It is not easy to find mutually beneficial relationship between organization and its stakeholders. Quite often building a network of reciprocal relationships with all stakeholders is not simple. In most companies, competitive pressures keep all eyes focused on the short term goals, making it extremely difficult to bring long-term issues to the forefront. Traditional accounting systems based on financial measures of performance make it difficult to assess the impact of intangibles like relationships or reputation. And collaboration means letting go out of control, which is always difficult for corporate managers schooled in the art of competition. There comes total quality management which can throw the new light on cooperation between stakeholders and organization offering new solutions in harmonization of these relationships. Comparing the characteristics of total quality ...

It is of great theoretical and methodological importance to determine the correlation between global security and sustainable development, the combination of national and universal interests. In this case, the analysis of the content of global security and sustainable development in terms of the categories of individuality, specificity, generality, dividing them into spheres of influence: local, national, regional, global or international, serves to determine their development trends. This article analyzes the issues of combining national and universal interests in ensuring global security and sustainable development at a new stage of development of Uzbekistan.

The article aims at evaluating the One Belt One Road project implemented by China that will define long-term trajectories of the world trade and finance development as well as prospects of Russia's participation in this project. It seems that the project under consideration is not a full alternative to the existing nowadays world system of railroad and sea shipping both from the viewpoint of the shipping cost and the scope of investment required. A possibility of full-scale refocusing of Russia's transport systems (the Trans-Siberian Railway, the Northern Sea Route) on the One Belt One Road project is not currently obvious, thus, one cannot state with certainty Russia's role in this project. Besides, implementing this project results in building in Eurasia a China-centric economy system that does not coincide with the structures built by Russia, i.e. the Eurasian Economic Union, the Customs Union and other ones. At the same time, the One Belt One Road project seems to have no alternatives. None of the other countries has proposed a project that can be compared with the One Belt One Road one in terms of being large-scale, having a global impact as well as long-term effects. It is believed, that after the implementation of the project is complete, the technological and social differences between Europe's and China's potentials, which were the reason for shipping goods from Southeast Asia to Europe over the past centuries, will be reduced to a significant extent. In terms of this the China-centric world will have to provide different noneconomic reasons for its existence, i.e. provide the world with new values and meanings of the postindustrial world. In this context Russia's participating in the One Belt One Road project may appear to be necessary: Russia can act as a project's security operator, a mediator between China and the countries who are participants of the Silk Road Economic Belt in cases where their interests collide. Russia can also generate values and meanings of economic processes. The safe transportation routes Russia has, i.e. the Trans-Siberian Railway, the Northern Sea Route as well as long-term friendly relations with the countries-participants of the Silk Road Economic Belt and Russia's being experienced in harmonizing different interests can become the key aspects contributing to success of this project.