Suchergebnisse

¿Rememoración, conmemoración? Cincuenta años después del Mayo de 68 resulta difícil diferenciar entre historia y memoria, pero una cosa es muy clara: el movimiento de mayo marcó a escala mundial una ruptura, el fin de una época –industrial– y el ingreso a otra, en la que la cultura es fundamental. Sin embargo, el artículo muestra que los actores a menudo prefirieron concebir su acción dentro de las categorías del mundo del que se estaba queriendo salir. Ello no impidió que las ciencias humanas y sociales, también dominadas por categorías pertenecientes a ese mundo agonizante, intentaran aquí y allá liberarse de ellas, algunas veces de una forma conservadora, incluso reaccionaria. Este artículo examina los asuntos teóricos que se esbozaron o precisaron a partir de Mayo del 68 para esas disciplinas; dibuja el espacio de los enfoques u orientaciones que así se confrontaron y extrae algunas lecciones para los debates contemporáneos en los que la subjetividad de los actores y los procesos de subjetivación y de desubjetivación ocupan un lugar importante.

El artículo de revisión, se orienta a las humanidades en la educación superior, en la era digital. A partir de la misión de la educación, con su compromiso de la formación humana y profesional, el ágora digital es considerada tanto escenario como mediación para las humanidades en la educación superior. La sociedad tecnológica plantea unos retos que se pueden examinar en estudios de finales del siglo XX e inicios del XXI. Asimismo, la situación de la educación y la formación humanística en este nuevo escenario abre unos senderos que se determinan como horizontes para su caminar en este nuevo hábitat digital. Aprendizaje autónomo y colaborativo, multiculturalismo, pensamiento crítico, responsabilidad planetaria, son saberes que pueden fortalecerse con la mediación de las TIC

The Covid-19 pandemic has shocked the ways of organizing the nations and has put enormous pressure on the knowledge systems. In these circumstances, the humanities offer a perspective that allows us to understand this event in its real complexity and, likewise, alert us to the potential risks faced by societies built around democratic and humanistic values.

This document is the first installment of three
texts, is reported as chair of political education,
directed the social bases and university,
implying, an initial framework for basic political
education, non-Politology and less electoral or
partisan, training needed to overcome mental
colonial structures and create autonomous political
subject capable, from a critical perspective,
to build a pluralistic and inclusive society in a
real way. In this paper we present a hypothetical
budget, decisions of national and international
political power, are not isolated from theoretical
concepts of the Social Sciences and Humanities
which are decisive in the ways of life of societies
of our time.

The author analyzes the role played by the Spanish Republican immigrants in Mexico, translating & broadcasting the work of Max Weber & German thinking. She particularly refers to the titanic task of translating Economia y sociedad (Economy and Society), Weber's magnus opus, recently considered by the International Sociological Assoc as the 20th century's most important book. Likewise, she points out the conditions & background that made this feasible & shows that the publication of this & other classical books on sociology was possible thanks to the exceptional intellectual collaboration established between the Spanish refugees immigrating to Mexico, when Franco rose to power, & the Fondo de Cultura Economica's publishing the works of the main European authors of the Hispanic world. The result of these joint efforts gave rise to a sort of Mexican "Marshall Plan" to rebuild social sciences & humanities, whose development had been cut short in Europe as a result of fascism's rise. 26 References. Adapted from the source document.

The article studies the problems of the socioeconomic development of the border territory of the countries of Northeast Asia (NEA) and its influence on the international integration of peripherals in Asia. The study starts from the assumption that the international integration of border areas depends on the presence of certain factors in the development of these territories. At a methodological level, various tools of geopolitical and geostrategic analysis were used in the coordinates of interdisciplinary dialogue, also using theoretical and methodological devices from various disciplines such as: the humanities, international relations, economics, and socioeconomic geography. The discrepancy between the national average development indicators is typical of the border periphery of all Northeast Asian countries. The findings obtained allow us to conclude that the territorial disparities revealed in the course of the study are manifested in all areas of social relations (demography, economy, management, infrastructure). Despite the peripheral / border areas function in different natural, economic, and political conditions and have different traditions of economic development. However, the structure of development problems, in general, has similar mechanisms of influence in the processes of economic integration in this region of the world.