Tämän Pro-gradu tutkielman tarkoituksena oli selvittää varusmiespalveluksen ensimmäisen 9 viikon vaikutusta veren ja syljen kortisolin lepoarvoihin, kortisolin vastetta harjoitteluun sekä korrelaatioita seerumin ja syljen kortisolin välillä eri viikoilla ja päivän aikana. Tutkittavina olivat 41 varusmiestä Kainuun Prikaatista (ikä19.6 ± 0.3 v). Varusmiehet suo-rittivat 45-minuuttia kestävän submaksimaalisen marssitestin viikoilla 2,4,7 ja 9. Syljen ja seerumin kortisoli mitattiin aamulla heti heräämisen jälkeen, ennen harjoitusta ja välittömästi harjoituksen jälkeen. Psyykkistä kuormittumista tutkimuksen aikana mitattiin lyhennetyllä 26 kysymyksen POMS kyselyllä, jonka tarkoituksena oli selvittää psyykkinen kuormitus varusmiespalvelun alussa sekä mielialan muutokset peruskoulutuskauden aikana. Kortisolin aamupitoisuuksien havaittiin laskevan viikosta 2 koko tutkimuksen ajan (p<0.001), syljestä mitattuna. Seerumista mitattu kortisolin aamupitoisuus laski merkitsevästi 7 viikon harjoittelun jälkeen (p<0.01). Kortisolipitoisuuden vaste submaksimaaliseen marssitestiin laski merkitsevästi viikolla kaksi seerumista mitattuna (p<0.05), syljen kor-tisolipitoisuus myös laski, mutta ei tilastollisesti merkitsevästi. Syljen ja seerumin välillä havaittiin korrelaatio levossa (r=0.49 - 0.85, p<0.001 - 0.023), ennen submaksimaalista harjoitusta (r=0.46 - 0.79, p<0.001 - 0.043), ja harjoituksen jälkeen (r=0.65 - 0.84, p<0.001 - 0.002). Negatiivista mielialaa kuvaavat depressio ja hämmennys laskivat peruskoulutuskauden alusta viikkoon 9 (p<0.01 - 0.001), myös positiivista mielialaa kuvaavan elinvoimaisuuden väheneminen (p<0.05). Tutkimustulosten perusteella syljen kortisolipitoisuudet heijastavat hyvin seerumin kor-tisolipitoisuuksien muutoksia elimistössä sekä levossa että rasituksessa. Mielialan vaihteluita mittaavan POMS-kyselyn perusteella ensimmäinen viikko varusmiespalvelua on henkisesti kuormittavaa. Tätä havaintoa tukee myös korkeampi aamun kortisolipitoisuus varusmiespalveluksen ensimmäisen viikon alussa verrattuna tutkimuksen muihin viikkoihin. ; The main purpose of this study was to examine correlations between serum and saliva cortisol at rest and in response to submaximal exercise during the first 9-week of military service. Changes in the mood were also measured by a shortened POMS-questionnaire to examine the psychological stress, as well as observe changes in the mood state. Healthy male subjects (n=41, aged 19.3 ±0.3) from Signal Battalion Northern Finland par-ticipated in the present study. Conscripts performed 45-minute submaximal marching exercise in the weeks 2, 4, 7 and 9. Serum and saliva cortisol samples were measured immedi-ately after an overnight fast at rest, two hours after a light breakfast before the exercise (pre-exercise) and immediately after the exercise (postexercise). Basal saliva cortisol concentration decreased significantly from week 2 during the entire study (p<0.001). The serum cortisol concentration decreased after 7 weeks of training (p<0.05). In response to submaximal exercise, the serum cortisol concentration decreased significantly (p<0.05) at week 2. The saliva cortisol concentration also decreased, but not statistically significantly. Correlations between the serum and saliva cortisol levels were observed at rest (r=0.49 - 0.85, p<0.001 - 0.023), pre-exercise (r=0.46 - 0.79, p<0.001 - 0.043) and post-exercise (r=0.65 - 0.84, p<0.001 - 0.002). Depression and confusion, which indicate negative mood states, decreased from the beginning of the military service to week 9 (p<0.01 - 0.001). Positive state vigour also decreased (p<0.05). The present study indicates that the saliva measurements of the cortisol reflect serum cortisol concentration at rest and in response to exercise. According to POMS-questionnaire, the first week of the basic military training is mentally stressful. This is supported by the fact, that basal cortisol concentration was higher in the beginning of the military service compared the rest of the service.
Hallinnon uudistaminen liian yksiäänistä ja kaavamaista Jenni Airaksisen väitöskirja Hankala hallintouudistus kohdistuu suomalaisen kunnallishallinnon uudistamiseen. Tutkimus osoittaa, että kaavamaisuuteen ja liialliseen konsensukseen perustuva uudistaminen voi pahimmillaan johtaa toiminnan taantumiseen tai jopa estää muutoksia. Poliittis-hallinnollisella eliitillä on pyrkimys ylläpitää sisäistä kiinteyttään ja tämä estää erilaisten näkökulmien esiintulon uudistamiskeskustelussa. Tämä puolestaan johtaa yksiääniseen uudistamiseen ja liialliseen konsensukseen. Tutkimuksen perusteella uudistuksissa mukana olevilla ihmisillä oli hyvin erilaisia käsityksiä uudistuksen tavoitteesta ja tehtävästä. Nämä käsitykset olivat keskenään osin voimakkaassakin ristiriidassa. Hallintouudistus tulkittiin kuntien haasteiden kannalta oikeanlaisena ja tarpeellisena toimintana, mutta samaan aikaan sen pelättiin johtavan kuntien päätösvallan ja itsenäisyyden menettämiseen. Ristiriitaiset käsitykset eivät kuitenkaan nousseet keskusteluun vaan uudistuksen läpikäyväksi teemaksi nousi konfliktien välttäminen ja konsensuksen tavoittelu, mikä käytännössä johti siihen, että uudistuksen tavoitteet jäivät saavuttamatta. Vaikeiden asioiden välttely johti siihen, että käytännön uudistaminen osoittautui liian hankalaksi. Yksiäänisyyteen pyrkivän ja kaavamaisen uudistamisen mahdollisuudet saada aikaan muutoksia ovat hyvin rajalliset. Rajallisuus korostuu entisestään, mikäli päätöksenteossa pyritään erilaisten mielipiteiden peittämiseen ja uudistusta eteenpäin vievien eliittiryhmien kiinteyden ylläpitämiseen. Hallinnon uudistamisessa tarvitaan uusia ja luovia tapoja ratkaista ongelmia. Uudet ratkaisut voivat kuitenkin syntyä vain, jos uudistamisessa kyetään luopumaan yhden yhteisen päämäärän ja sen tavoittelun ihanteesta ja hyväksytään uudistamiseen liittyvä moniäänisyys. Hallinnon uudistamista tulisi tutkimuksen mukaan tarkastella prosessina, jossa erilaisten tulkintojen ja preferenssien kamppailu on normaalia toimintaa. Tällainen lähestymistapa voidaan suomalaisessa kompromissi- ja konsensushakuisessa kulttuurissa kokea vaikeaksi, mutta mikäli hallinnon uudistamisessa toimivat ryhmät jättävät vaikeat asiat pois agendaltaan konsensustavoitteen nimissä, päädytään hallinnon uudistamisessa helposti hankalaan hallinnon uudistamiseen. HANKALA HALLINNON UUDISTAMINEN näkyy pienten askeleiden kautta tapahtuvina, kompromissiratkaisuista kehittyneinä, pirstaleisina hallinnon uudistamisen osahankkeina, joiden kautta voidaan muutosten toteuttamisen sijaan ylläpitää olemassaolevia rakenteita ja vältellä muutosta. ; Troublesome Nature of Administrative Reform The topic of my research is an administrative reform which is studied as a dynamic and contextualised phenomenon. The aim was to understand the nature and the essence of an administrative reform in the context of local government in Finland. The Regional Support Project (Seutukuntien tuki -hanke) was chosen as an empirical example of a reform in this study. The project was launched by the national government in 2000 as a response to the transition process of local governance of Finland. In this context the municipalities were trying to solve the contradiction of their diminishing resources and increasing demands by increasing voluntary cooperation in service provision and regional development. The aim of the project was to promote inter-municipal cooperation by means of state support and permissive legislation. The empirical data is qualitative and the method of analysis is based on grounded theory. The purpose of the method is to produce a practical theory derived from the experiences of those people who have lived through the administrative reform. The process of analysis was to define emerging concepts and make continuous comparisons to the empirical data and to other conceptual innovations. By linking the discovered concepts to each other, the patterns of social behavior and meaning of action were generated. The empirical data of the study was collected during 2000 2005. The primary data consists of 154 interviews and approximately 60 pages of observation material. The data was collected in the national level steering group of the reform and in all of the eight districts (comprising 55 municipalities) taking part in the project. The secondary data includes official documents of the Regional Support Project produced by the central government, different districts and the municipalities. The grounded theory -procedure revealed four partly conflicting frames. The different frames are the rhetoric and the reality of governance practices, national government as the reformer of autonomous local government, the fear of hollowing out local government and the gap between the elite and the masses. The phenomenon of administrative reform is experienced and interpreted differently depending on the frame adopted. In a situation, where contradicting frames are visible, a conflict is possible and even probable. However, this was not the case in the administrative reform studied. Instead, the most evident patterns of behavior in the reform process were pronounced pursuit of consensus, compromise seeking and avoidance of conflict. My research shows that the core process of an administrative reform is maintaining the cohesion of the elite . With this concept it was possible to connect the discovered contradicting frames to each other. Through an analysis of the interplay between the different frames and the core process, the dynamics of the administrative reform are unfolded. Essential in understranding the dynamics of an administrative reform is the existence of the conflicting frames and coincident objective of maintaining the cohesion of the elite. This combination is likely to lead to a wobbly and slow process and shows the troublesome nature of an administrative reform. The theoretical model created in this research, shows the process of an administrative reform as an application of unisonous instrumental-rational patterns. The possibilities of the above-mentioned approach are highly limited in producing new ways of function. Such limitedness is even more problematic in a multi-actor, network-type situation, where different interpretations of situations are not confronted but concealed in the fear of conflicts. Instead, administrative reform practices could be seen as historically and culturally defined processes of production of meanings, where the struggle of different ideas and interpretations is considered normal. The acceptance of struggle as a part of administrative reform requires that the individuals of the decision-making elites are ready to function in groups, where anxiety is allowed to be present at times. The groups the decision-making elites in administrative reforms are trying to find new creative solutions to the problems they face. Creative solutions develop in situations where genuine negotiation between different meanings and interpretations is present. Negotiation is however not possible in a situation where the fundamental objective of an elite-group is to prevent the individuals of the group from exposing to anxiety. If this is accepted, it is likely to lead to small steps, bad compromises and fragmented application of reform practices. In the context of administrative reforms this is problematic for it can lead to the regression of action or actually supporting the practices already functioning. These insights indicate why the nature of administrative reform is troublesome.
The book called "Inhimillinen ja tehokas sosiaali- ja terveysjohtaminen"(Humane and effective social- and health management) gathers together vital debate on social and health management and its needs both in current and future organisations. The perspectives presented in the book are networks, structures, interaction, professional expertise, couture of knowledge, meaningfulness of work, competence, diversity and experience. The book is edited by Antti Syväjärvi and Ville Pietiläinen. - Kirja haastaa pohtimaan sosiaali- ja terveysjohtamisen ajankohtaisia kysymyksiä, jotka asemoituvat toimialan uudistumiseen ja etenkin toimialan organisaatioiden johtamiseen. Teos käsittelee johtamiseen liittyviä uudistustarpeita, mutta myös johtamiseen linkittyviä teemoja kuten verkostoja, rakenteita, vuorovaikutusta, ammatillista asiantuntijuutta, tietokulttuuria, työn mielekkyyttä, kyvykkyyttä, monimuotoisuutta ja kokemuksellisuutta. Inhimillisesti tehokasta sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollon johtamista pidetään helposti ristiriitaisena, koska inhimillinen ja tehokas koetaan usein toisilleen vastakkaisiksi ulottuvuuksiksi. Molemmille on kuitenkin nähtävissä synkroninen tilaus kehittyvässä sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollossa. Teoksessa tarjotaan oivalluksia, kuinka inhimillisyys ja tehokkuus voidaan samanaikaisesti huomioida sosiaali- ja terveysjohtamisessa. Kirja sopii sosiaali- ja terveysalan johtajille, johtajaksi hakeutuville tai johtamista opiskeleville. Kirja koostuu mielenkiintoisista luvuista, joita ovat kirjoittaneet alan tutkijat eri tutkimuslaitoksista painottaen myös käytännön antia johtamiselle. Kirja on syntynyt Työsuojelurahaston, Lapin ja Pohjois-Pohjanmaan sairaanhoitopiirien rahoittamassa tutkimuksessa.
An estimated 90% of all confirmed COVID-19 cases occur in rural and urban areas around the world, where all industries and sectors have been severely impacted. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted and intensified many of the difficulties and uncertainties local governments face in carrying out their responsibilities. Apart from restoring normalcy, local governments in the National Capital Region face specific challenges, as they must double their efforts and interventions to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), as well as restore and reinforce community resilience in both short and long-term response and action. Local government plays a significant role in providing social services in normal times and ensures that these public services are accessible in times of adversity and distress, as well as acting as first responders in disaster prevention, rescue, and restoration. While the world has not yet crossed everyone, and some issues remain unresolved, the author agrees that unprecedented decisions and good practices from neighboring countries should have been taken to protect citizens, especially the most vulnerable. The author examined and reviewed the various mechanisms used by various local governments in Metro Manila, as well as the SDG framework, to analyze the challenges and good practices for local responses to the pandemic and mitigating its effects. The author finds that identifying the challenges faced by various local governments in Metro Manila as well as how they deal with these challenges and recognizing their good practices would aid local governments in long-term sustainability planning and development.
This volume looks at the Finnish-German military alliance (1941–1944) as a translation zone – a multilingual network of military, administrative and civilian encounters that was held together by linguistically versed soldiers and civilians acting as interpreters and translators. It focuses on interpreters and liaison officers of the Finnish Liaison Staff in Rovaniemi, who were assigned to the staffs of the German army units with the task of maintaining communication between the two armies and assisting German troops in their daily matters. Furthermore, attention is paid to Finnish civilians, especially women whose language skills made them candidates for a range of mediation tasks in the German units. The reconstruction of military interpreters' and liaison officers' tasks and mediation agency between the two military cultures is based on their war-time weekly reports, whereas the civilian interpreters' experiences are drawn from a variety of autobiographical accounts, including interviews.
Kansalaisosallistuminen YVA-menettelyssä Ympäristövaikutusten arviointimenettelyn (YVA) yksi keskeinen tavoite on lisätä kansalaisten tiedonsaantia ja osallistumista ympäristövaikutuksiltaan merkittävissä hankkeissa. YVA-menettelyllä pyritään tuomaan kansalaisten näkemykset, huolet ja toiveet mukaan suunnitteluun ja päätöksentekoon mahdollisimman varhaisessa vaiheessa. YVA edustaa väitöstutkimuksessa modernia vuorovaikutteista ympäristöpolitiikan ohjauskeinoa ja osallistumisen välinettä. Väitöstyön ensimmäisenä tutkimustehtävänä oli luoda YVAan osallistumisen analyysille teoreettinen viitekehys: millaista demokratia- ja suunnitteluideaa YVA voi edustaa ja millainen politiikkaverkosto YVA on kansalaisosallistumisen kannalta. Toisena tutkimustehtävänä analysoitiin YVAan osallistumisen historiallista kehittymistä ja muutoksia Suomessa. Kolmantena tutkimustehtävänä tarkasteltiin osallistumisen käytännön toteutusta sekä arvioitiin osallistumisen vaikuttavuutta. Lisäksi analysoitiin vaikuttavuuden mahdollisia esteitä, miten läpinäkyviä ja avoimia YVA-menettelyt ovat ja miten hyväksyttävänä osallistumisvälineenä YVAa pidetään. Osallistumisen kannalta olennainen seikka on YVAn institutionaalisuus: se on julkishallinnon luoma väline, jonka lisäksi toimenharjoittajalla on keskeinen YVA-menettelyn käytännön toteuttajan rooli. Tämä luo osallistumisen kannalta rakenteita, joissa korostuu toimijoiden väliset epäsymmetriset valta-asemat. YVA-menettelystä tulee helposti kaikille osapuolille vallan käytön ja politiikan tekemisen väline ja niin osallistumisen järjestämistä kuin itse osallistumista ohjaavat toimijoiden poliittiset intressit ja tavoitteet. YVA on parhaimmillaan eri osapuolten välinen avoin keskusteluareena, joka lisää suunnittelun ja päätöksenteon läpinäkyvyyttä, mutta YVA on myös poliittisen kamppailun areena. Suomen YVA-lainsäädännössä osallistumisella on aina ollut tärkeä rooli. Suomalaisessa YVA-järjestelmässä on korostettu kansalaisten osallistumismahdollisuuksia. Ajan saatossa myös kriittisyys laajaa osallistumisoikeutta ja useita osallistumismahdollisuuksia kohtaan on lieventynyt. Haaste on kuitenkin siinä, että osallistumisen toteutus määritellään laissa väljästi, eikä lainsäädäntö takaa laadukasta osallistumista tai varsinkaan sen vaikuttavuutta. Toinen havaittu haaste on YVAn ja osallistumisen suhde päätöksentekoon. YVAn ulkopuoliset päätöksentekojärjestelmät ja edustuksellisen vallankäytön rakenteet eivät ole muuttuneet, ja siksi YVAn vaikuttavuus voi jäädä vähäiseksi. Vaikka YVA edustaisikin osallistuvaa demokratiaa ja toteuttaisi vuorovaikutteista ja moniäänistä suunnittelua, voi osallistumisen merkitys vesittyä ja kansalaisten osallistumisaktiivisuus hiipua. Ilmiöön liittyy myös tarpeetonta kriittisyyttä. Osallistumisen vaikuttavuus ei ole kertaluonteista, vaan se on usein välillistä ja ajoittuu prosessin eri vaiheisiin. Osallistumisen merkitystä ja vaikutuksia ei aina tunnisteta. YVAsta ei ole muodostunut Suomessa laajojen joukkojen osallistumisvälinettä. Ennemminkin YVAan osallistuvat tyypillisesti harvat kansalaisaktiivit, jotka hyödyntävät YVAn lisäksi lukuisia muitakin osallistumisen ja vaikuttamisen keinoja. Osallistujien määrän sijaan huomio tulee kuitenkin kiinnittää sisältöön ja suunnittelun moniäänisyyteen. Olennainen kysymys on se, millaisen roolin kansalaiset ja maallikkoasiantuntijuus voivat saada perinteisesti asiantuntijavetoisessa suunnittelukulttuurissa. ; Public participation in environmental impact assessment Environmental impact assessment (EIA) is a policy instrument based in law and used to prevent harmful environmental impacts, increase public information access, and improve public participation opportunities. EIA is an open process for discussion and participation of different actors: it increases the transparency and broadens the information base of environmental policy planning and decision making. One aim of EIA is to incorporate citizens views and opinions, concerns and desires into planning at an early stage. EIA is a process of identifying and evaluating potential impacts from proposed activities. It is also an interactive and communicative policy instrument and should facilitate direct participation. EIA is an example in the development process of direct participation in Finland during 1990 s. In this study EIA is approached as a participation instrument. Public participation is the perspective from which the EIA-process is analysed. The aim of the research is to examine participation in EIA both a theoretical and empirical way, and to interpret and explain the operation logic and efficacy of participation. There are three main research tasks in the study. The first task is to create a theoretical framework for analysis of public participation in EIA. For this purpose, the theoretical and methodological triangulation is made in the study. There are four main parts in the triangulation. Firstly, the elements of participative and deliberative democracy and communicative planning theories are combined. This theoretical discussion shows what kind of democracy and planning EIA can represents. Secondly, network analysis and evaluation are integrated in the methodological triangulation. The concepts of policy networks and intervention theory are used in theoretical and methodological manner. The outcomes of theoretical and methodological triangulation are criteria of deliberative EIA and four policy network models of EIA as an instrument of public participation: 1) EIA as a negotiation process; 2) EIA as a technical process of information collection, 3) EIA as an information instrument; and 4) EIA as tool for controlling of participation. While the theoretical part of the thesis has its own analytical objectives, these policy network models are utilized with evaluation criteria in the empirical part of the study. The second research task is to analyse the historical development of participation in Finnish EIA legislation. The focus of this part is on the long lasting political process and arguments behind the enacting of Finnish EIA Act in 1980 s and 1990 s. The most important amendments of EIA legislation and the international and national reasons behind them are also considered. According to results of this part of thesis, the role of participation has been central to the Finnish EIA system. Even if the EIA Act was implemented in Finland relatively late in 1994, the legislative foundation for public participation has always been strong. Though the implementation of participation is defined in a flexible way, Finnish EIA legislation supports public participation and in principle creates possibilities for deliberative democracy. The third research task is to evaluate public participation in two case studies. This part includes following questions: 1) what kind of objectives do different actors seek from participation; 2) how does participation impact EIA and what are the obstacles of effective participation; and 3) how transparent and acceptable is the EIA process? The two cases used, the EIA of a road project and the final disposal of nuclear waste, show how much the aims, the implementation and the effectiveness of public participation can not only vary between different projects, but also during the planning process in one certain project. Notably, in the nuclear waste case, the nature of top-down instrument of EIA was clearly observed, while the developer of the project assumed a dominant role. The three elements of policy network (actors, arenas and agenda) were defined by the developer. Even if participation was carried out with great visibility, professional implementation and sufficient resources, the impact of public participation and lay people expertise was not so essential, while the economic and political interests of the project and the role of experts were in central role. In this case study EIA represents the policy network model of controlling of participation: the role of governance was more important than deliberative participation. In the road case the planning situation was more open. There did not seem to be the same need to define and control participation and the agenda of the EIA. The contribution of citizens was used in planning in a more effective manner. The EIA assumed a more traditional role as an information distribution tool, and as a place for open discussion and effective participation. The case studies suggest that the legislative base can not alone guarantee the effectiveness of public participation. Most important factor is the attitude of main actors. Each EIA process is unique and general theories of participation in EIA are difficult to create. In practice, the EIA is more or less an institutional process of power division between different actors, and the developer has the central role. EIA is an open arena that allows political disagreements to form and emerge into the open. However, EIA can also be used to promote political interests. EIA and participation can be harnessed by the proponent, but EIA can also feed the so called NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) phenomenon. It is also possible, that policy instruments like EIA create a new elite active lay experts. Theoretical ideas of deliberative democracy or communicative planning are challenging to implement in practice. At the same time it is important to estimate the criteria and expectations concerning participation. One can see, that EIA has lot of deliberative potential, but the main challenges are in the relationship between EIA and decision making, and in the structures of political power and decision making outside of EIA.
This edited volume discusses multiple job holding as part of Finnish working life. The articles in this book examine this little researched phenomenon through a wide range of empirical data. Based on Statistics Finland's register data, different ways of combining jobs are classified. Interview material sheds light on the conditions for holding multible jobs. A new perspective is provided by the chaos theory of careers.
According to the results of the study, very different paths lead to becoming a multiple job holder. The combination of jobs is influenced by the life path and interests of the individual, as well as by constraints and opportunities available. Motives can also be linked to professional networks, decisions made by immediate family, coincidences or whims.
This book helps to understand the diversity of ways of working. At the same time, it illustrates the challenges faced by those who work multiple jobs as they try to operate within simpler models and categorisations of labour. It is essential reading for anyone interested in the changing nature of work, especially researchers, students and policy-makers.
State defense threats that arise as a result of the development of the global, regional and national strategic environment also include social conflicts that are still widely found in various parts of Indonesia. The preparation of a national defense strategy from an early age is very much needed to face the worst possibility and the government must hold a total war. The involvement of all national resources is needed including human resources, social conflict is a serious problem in the development of the defense force, so a solution must be found. This paper uses a phenomenological qualitative descriptive method and the theory of defense policy implementation by Lukman Yudho Prakoso to analyze the current problems. The research results show that there is still a need to carry out good handling in handling social conflicts that are integrated, can communicate interactively between entities, and implement transparent, controlled and accountable activities. So that the conclusion can be formulated that it is necessary to instill the value of State defense in handling social conflicts, so that it is hoped that awareness will arise in the community for responsibility in defending the State. Another conclusion is that a strategy is needed to build the best network and the involvement of an entity that functions as a Driver Force for handling social conflicts in supporting military campaign strategies.
A well-functioning food safety regulatory arrangement is important for ensuring the standards of foodstuffs, better food business, and the protection of public health in a given country. This article deals with the perceived determinants of the food safety regulation in Bangladesh. Based on literature review, we propose an analytical framework and identify key determinants that might influence effective food safety regulation in a developing country like Bangladesh. We then conduct a perception survey on 200 different kinds of stakeholders involved with the regulation of foodstuffs standards. We utilize descriptive mode of statistical analysis in our study. In our findings, actual autonomy of the main regulatory agency, and actual inter-organizational coordination are perceived as important determinates of effective food safety regulation. Proper enforcement of regulation, and accountability and transparency are perceived another factors of quality food safety regulation. It is also perceived that penalties are not sufficient enough for the food safety offences. Technical personnel and the state of the art laboratory facilities are other determinants of the regulation of food safety. Again, decentralized food safety regulatory network is perceived as very important determinant of the control of the food safety hazards at all level as well as an effective regulatory arrangement. The policy makers need to take into account the perceived determinates for desired food safety regulatory outcome in Bangladesh
The edited volume Archives and the Cultural Heritage focuses on archives as institutions and to their tense relationship with archives as material. These dynamics are discussed in respect of the past, the present, and the future. The focus lies in the mechanisms the Finnish archive institutions have utilised when taking part in forming the cultural heritage and in debating the importance of the private archives in society. Within social sciences and history from the early 1990s onwards, the effects of globalisation have been seen as a new focal point for research. Momentarily, the archives saw the same paradigm shift as the focus of the archival studies proceeded from state to society. This brought forth the notion that the values of society are reflected in the acquisition of archival material. This archival turn draws attention to the archives as entities formed by cultural practices. The volume discusses cultural heritage within Finnish archives with diverse perspectives and from various time periods. The key concepts are cultural heritage and archives – both as institution and as material. Articles review the formation of archival collections spanning from the 19th to the 21st century and highlight that the archives have never been neutral or objective actors; rather, they have always been an active process of remembering and forgetting, a matter of inclusion and exclusion. The focus is on private archives and on the choices that guided the creation of the archives and the cultural perceptions and power structures associated with them. Although private archives have considerable social and research value, and although their material complements the picture of society provided by documentary data produced by public administrations, they have only risen to the theoretical discussions in the 21st century. The authors consider what has happened before the material ends up in the archive, what happens in the archive and what can be deduced from this. It shows how archival solutions manifest themselves, how they have influenced research and how they still affect it. One of the key questions is whose past has been preserved and whose is deemed worthy of preservation. Under what conditions have the permanently preserved documents been selected and how can they be accessed? In addition, the volume pays attention to whose documents have been ignored or forgotten, as well as to the networks and power of the individuals within the archival institution and to the politics of memory. The Archives and the Cultural Heritage is an opening to a discussion on the mechanisms, practices and goals of Finnish archival activities. It challenges archival organisations to reflect on their own operating models and to make visible their own conscious or unconscious choices. It raises awareness of the formation of the Finnish documentary cultural heritage, produces new information about private archives and participates in the scientific debate on the changing significance of archives in society. The volume is related to the Academy of Finland research project "Making and Interpreting National Pasts – Role of Finnish Archives as Networks of Power and Sites of Memory" (no 25257, 2011–2014/2019), University of Turku. Project partners Finnish Literature Society (SKS) and Society of Swedish Literature in Finland (SLS).
VTT Working Papers 44 ; VTT on selvittänyt yritysjohtajien näkemyksiä Suomen T&K-ympäristön nykyisestä tilasta ja tulevaisuudesta. Tarkoituksena on saada tarkempaa tietoa siitä, miten Suomi selviää globalisaation haasteista tänään ja tulevaisuudessa. Merkittäväksi nousi ennen kaikkea suomalaisten yritysten tutkimus- ja kehitystyön (T&K) investointien jakaantuminen Suomen ja ulkomaiden välillä. Selvityksen vastaajiksi valittiin toimitusjohtajia liikevaihdoltaan suurimmista suomalaisista yrityksistä (50) ja kansainvälistyvistä innovatiivisista pk-yrityksistä (160). Vastausprosentti oli 49. Selvitys tehtiin yhteistyössä Zef Solutions Oy:n kanssa 29.12.2005-10.1.2006. Selvityksen mukaan suomalaisten yritysten T&K-investoinneista 56 prosenttia päätyy nykyään kotimaahan, mutta kuuden vuoden päästä osuus on enää vain 46 prosenttia. ; VTT has inquired executives' views on the current state and future prospects of Finnish R&D environment. The aim was to get detailed information on, how Finland will confront the globalisation challenges today and in coming years. The division of R&D between domestic and foreign location turned into one of the most significant issues. The CEOs of largest Finnish companies (50) and innovative internationalising SMEs (160) constituted the population of respondents. Total response rate climbed into 49 percent. The study was conducted in co-operation with Zef Solutions Oy 29.12.2005-10.1.2006. According to analysis at the moment 56 percent of Finnish companies R&D investments are made in home country as the amount in six years time will be only 46 percent.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a contagious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. The virus that causes COVID-19 spreads mainly when an infected person is in close contact with another person. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of COVID-19 on different countries, using USA as comparism factor. Ninety four countries were selected based on their continents, countries and cases of infection. Data from each country were obtained from United Nations Geoscheme and WHO and were analyzed and compared to that of the United State of America (USA).Data analyzed revealed that most countries in Africa appears to be least affected by the virus. Data also revealed that many countries have been able to understand and manage the spread and infectivity of the virus compared to the USA. Result from the study also showed that the many countries have been able to improve on managing the infection when compared to USA mortality. This may be due to among other factors a more robust immune response, herd immunity and united approach in the management of the disease. The result also helps to provide insight as to how significant developing and providing vaccine may be to this part of the world. Result from the study suggests that while Africa has a better immunity for the virus, there seems to be improvement the management of disease by other continent.
Finnish local government has been subjected to many reforms in the last few decades. The reforms will continue in the near future as health, social services and regional government are being reformed. Structural reforms and numerous projects have not altered the fact that concrete procedures still change slowly in local governments. This article deals with reforms in local government. It focuses on determining the kind of information and expertise used in the reforms and the expertise required. The research is empirical and focuses on one particular case: preparation of the multi-municipal merger of Oulu region. Research on reforms of local governments, studied from the viewpoints of information and expertise, reveals that traditional public administration structures still have an impact on reform work. Even though steps towards New Public Governance procedures have been taken, reform processes remain strongly based on the information and expertise of the local government organization. Cooperation with different sector actors (the private and third sectors, universities, citizens) takes place from the viewpoint of the local government. The expertise of stakeholders is not at the core of reform processes. Reform processes are based mainly on the existing information and practices. There is much less innovation and less creation and application of new information. The expertise needed in local government reform is diverse. The reform processes have great need for the skills that are typical of network and generative leadership. A successful reform results from the work of a couple of key actors who have the skills to create frameworks for the existence and exploitation of collective expertise.
