Suchergebnisse

This thesis defines and describes the industrialization processes which occurred within existing units of production in the department of the Meuse (France) between 1790 and 1914. In proposed modeling, each studied unit of production belongs to an evolutionary industrialization system, which includes other subsystems. Thus appear, around a unit of production, the population, the natural resources, the infrastructures, the energy forms and financing. The environment of the industrialization systems is made up by the legislation, itself evolutionary. The subsystems of the model are described in a first part, and information of a general nature is given regarding the development of each one of them as such, between 1790 and 1914. In a second part, specific industrialization systems are described for a number of sectors of industrial activity, in particular metallurgy, textiles, glassmaking and faience manufactures, the leather and skin, wood and food industries. Case studies propose restitutions in the form of historical stories. Settings in perspective put these chosen industrialization systems into the more general context of the concerned activities studied in the department, and, more largely, the French industry of the 19th century. ; Dans cette thèse sont définis et décrits des processus d'industrialisation qui ont pris naissance au sein d'unités de production ayant existé dans le département de la Meuse (France) entre 1790 et 1914. Dans la modélisation proposée, chaque unité de production étudiée fait à tout moment partie d'un système d'industrialisation évolutif, qui comprend d'autres sous-systèmes. Figurent ainsi, autour d'une unité de production, la population, les ressources naturelles, les infrastructures, les formes d'énergie et le financement. L'environnement des systèmes d'industrialisation est constitué par la législation, elle-même évolutive. Les sous-systèmes du modèle sont décrits dans une première partie, et des informations à caractère général sont données quant au développement de chacun d'eux ...

This thesis defines and describes the industrialization processes which occurred within existing units of production in the department of the Meuse (France) between 1790 and 1914. In proposed modeling, each studied unit of production belongs to an evolutionary industrialization system, which includes other subsystems. Thus appear, around a unit of production, the population, the natural resources, the infrastructures, the energy forms and financing. The environment of the industrialization systems is made up by the legislation, itself evolutionary. The subsystems of the model are described in a first part, and information of a general nature is given regarding the development of each one of them as such, between 1790 and 1914. In a second part, specific industrialization systems are described for a number of sectors of industrial activity, in particular metallurgy, textiles, glassmaking and faience manufactures, the leather and skin, wood and food industries. Case studies propose restitutions in the form of historical stories. Settings in perspective put these chosen industrialization systems into the more general context of the concerned activities studied in the department, and, more largely, the French industry of the 19th century. ; Dans cette thèse sont définis et décrits des processus d'industrialisation qui ont pris naissance au sein d'unités de production ayant existé dans le département de la Meuse (France) entre 1790 et 1914. Dans la modélisation proposée, chaque unité de production étudiée fait à tout moment partie d'un système d'industrialisation évolutif, qui comprend d'autres sous-systèmes. Figurent ainsi, autour d'une unité de production, la population, les ressources naturelles, les infrastructures, les formes d'énergie et le financement. L'environnement des systèmes d'industrialisation est constitué par la législation, elle-même évolutive. Les sous-systèmes du modèle sont décrits dans une première partie, et des informations à caractère général sont données quant au développement de chacun d'eux ...

Industrialization policies since independence in 1960; Mali. Summary in English p. 179.

In this article marriage and urban adaption in two Swedish towns, Linköping and Sundsvall, during the early phase of Swedish industrialization, have been studied.The results stress the danger of generalization when discussing the inter-relationsship between industrialization and urban démographie behaviour. The industrial town, represented by Sundsvall, even if it displayed a very specific "industrial migration", did not necessarily produce an equally specific urban/industrial demography within its population. Linköping, with a more agra-rian character, displayed almost the same marriage structure as the industrialized Sundsvall, despite its totally différent economy and its différent migration pattern.

Comparative analysis of the Tunisian and Moroccan economic and social systems. Growth, industrialization, trade, foreign investments, and cost and standard of living.

Recent Models of Development of Economie Regions in the Soviet Union.
In this article the author observes the tendencies in regional development in the Soviet Union between 1949 and 1971 with particular emphasis on the period beginning in 1960.
Regional development models have undergone considerable transformation since World War II due to the progressive industrialization of the country. However, industrialization, not having been undertaken simultaneously in all regions, vast differences in economic growth are perceptible from one to the other.
The author briefly analyses regional development by successive periods. He concludes that progressive industrialization and differences in regional demographic tendencies make it possible to classify the regions as being more or less developed. In his opinion a North-South cleavage has arisen since 1960 and is distinguished by marked differences in economic growth and a type of migration characterized by inequalities in the incomes of relatively comparable social groups.
After attempting to ascertain whether the development of Soviet economic policy is mainly the result of deliberate planning or of other political options, the author concludes that a satisfactory answer to such a question would demand a more complete analysis of the whole Soviet development process.

At the confluence of two intellectual traditions (Weberian political economy & the Foucauldian analysis of the exercise of power & domination), this article suggests that the cogwheels of the economy also drive the power relations engendering the domination, & sometimes repression, of the people. Based on a case study of a specific country (Tunisia) & situational context (industrial modernization), the article shows that the mechanisms controlling the populace as a whole are anchored in the most commonplace power relations & that these practices may serve as much to coerce, even repress, the citizenry as to pave the way for an "economic miracle.". Adapted from the source document.