Suchergebnisse

Introduction. In the conditions of weakening of state control over the development of monetary and credit relations, the liberalization of foreign economic relations and the increase of the influence of the political situation on economic processes, the system of ensuring financial security of the state has a special role in the economy of Ukraine. Problems in the field of ensuring financial security do not allow creating conditions for economic growth, have a negative impact on the financial, tax, insurance and the budget process in the country. Therefore, in today's conditions, the issue of ensuring an adequate level of financial security of the state, defining the role in the system of its provision of financial institutions is important.Purpose. Study of the essence of financial security of Ukraine and determination of the role and importance of financial institutions in the system of ensuring financial security of the state.Methods. Analysis, synthesis, generalization.Results. The general problem of all financial regulators in Ukraine is an inadequate level of interaction and coordination with other public authorities, as well as insufficient transparency and openness of information about their activities. Normative acts regulating the functioning of state bodies usually establish a procedure for accountability and subordination to other authorities, as well as the possibility of interaction with them, but there are no real mechanisms for effective communication and coordination.Originality. This article explores practical aspects of financial security as the protection of state interests in the financial sector, the appropriate level of fiscal, tax and monetary system that guarantees state's ability to effectively generate, store excessive depreciation and rational use of financial resources of the country to ensure its socio-economic development and servicing of financial obligations. The role and importance in the system to ensure the financial security of the state financial institutions, including isolated and exposed three main groups of financial institutions, financial intermediaries; international financial institutions; financial institutions regulators.Conclusion. In order to ensure the financial security of the state of Ukraine, it is necessary to implement a set of measures aimed at increasing the participation of financial institutions in promoting the development of domestic business, supporting research, introducing innovations, etc. On the other hand, the implementation of a number of institutional and legal and organizational measures will greatly contribute to increasing the role of financial institutions in Ukraine's financial security system in the context of financial globalization.

Introduction. As unsatisfied current state of labour market functioning causes instable and social tensity, the necessity of socio- psychological research and analysis of labour market as an institution of socialization, as well as forming, considering the identified specific features of innovative approaches to subject of government control to the process its regulation, appear. Purpose. The purpose of the article is making a theoretical methodological analysis of current labour market state as a social institution, and also determining and analyzing the main functions considering the specificity of domestic society. Methods. Formal-logical method is used to determine the basic concepts, such as the concept of a system of socio-psychological researches of the social institution; monographic and comparative methods - to systematize scientific approaches to building economic security of certain types of financial institutions; method of theoretical generalization - to create a list of elements of the system of economic security of financial institutions; ordering method - to create a list of factors influencing the formation of a system of economic security of financial institutions and the principles of its construction. It is established that the labour market is a social and organized institution that operates on the principles of compatibility, agreement and equivalence. The type and the main features of the labour market in Ukraine are defined. The level of unemployment for the period of 2004-2014 years is analyzed as a determinant of the labour market quality. Reproductive, communicative, regulative, adaptive, compatible, differential, social, hedonistic and productive functions of the labour market as a social institution is considered. The disfunctions are found and their possible causes are named. Originality. We describe the functioning of the organization a new for Ukraine prospective structure of the labour market called "Career Center". The ideology, the goals, the objectives, the key areas of work centers is defined. The tasks in areas and ways of their implementation are concretized. The prospects for further researches in the development of concepts and measures for optimization of state influence on the functioning of the labour market as a full-fledged social institution are laid. Conclusion. The institutional crisis of the labour market in Ukraine shows that the labour market as a social institution doesn't perform any social order and doesn't correspond to the features of civil society and constitutional state.It is accompanied by the decline of the state authority, the negative assessment of its activities and the regress of other social institutions such as economy and education. The recent areas of the labour market as a social institution growth are recognized in updating and creating new structures, based on the European experience, that provide an effective conduction of the functions of young socialization in Ukrainian society. Such structures must become the platforms of constant interaction between business and universities and also to have the support of the state. The prospects for the further research are based on the development of the concepts and measures for optimizing the state's influence on the labour market functioning as an adequate social institution.

In the modern political process, an important role is played by political actors who really influence the political process. The most active actors in the political process include political leaders, political parties, public organizations, etc., which, depending on the level of maturity of civil society in a particular country, influence political decision-making processes and the implementation of national and local policies. The political regimes of different states stimulate or inhibit the initiative of the subjects of the political process. However, the subjects of the political process are able to change the features of a particular political regime. Political institutions functioning in the political process go through the following eight stages. First, it is important for a political institution to define a goal that allows you to clearly define the goals and directions of its activities, which in turn increases its subjectivity. Second, political institutions must make political predictions to increase the effectiveness of their political activities. Third, the ability to make the right political decisions is important for a political institution. Fourth, in order to achieve their goal, political institutions must carry out political socialization and political mobilization, which increases their subjectivity. Fifth, political institutions implement the planned goals and adjust tactical activities. Sixth, political institutions must monitor the implementation of political decisions. Seventh, political institutions must analyze and summarize their political activities. Eighth, political institutions must define new strategies in their political activities, which allows them to increase their subjectivity.

Summary: Provision of scientific articles reveal the essence for investigative (search) actions in penal institutions. Investigated the need for priority allocation of investigators (search), since this will facilitate efficient pre-trial inquiry and further litigation of criminal cases. The author suggested to supplement the current legislation of Ukraine, in part to develop Instruction on the procedure for carrying out urgent investigation (search) and neglasnih investigators (search) action on crimes committed in penal institutions.

The article analyzes the current trends in the development of the institution of political opposition. The evolution of conceptual ideas about the essence of the phenomenon of political opposition is revealed. In a consolidated democracy, the political opposition ensures the change of political forces and elite groups in the management of the state, personnel rotation in government structures, as well as the exercise of control over political power. Instead, in transitive political regimes, the role of the political opposition is growing significantly. The quality of the institution of political opposition precedes the potential for democratization of a particular regime. The right to political opposition is one of the fundamental elements of modern liberal democracy. The ability to openly criticize the ruling elite, to defend their alternative interests, to propose other political solutions, to win power by participating in political elections is guaranteed by law. In politics, opposition is defined as: opposition to the opinion of the majority or the dominant opinion in the legislative, party and other structures that declare their commitment to democratic procedures; contrasting one's political course with another.The importance of the institution of political opposition is due to the fact that the opposition is the potential government of tomorrow. The initial point is what place the opposition forces occupied in the system of power relations of the country, which way it came to power. Because over time, this affects the very nature of power, and how easily and painlessly the change of power will take place.It is concluded that under the regime of polyarchy and in transitive regimes, effective, strong opposition is the key to stability in the work of the entire state mechanism. The existence of the opposition creates a balance in the political system and protects the regime not only from authoritarian manifestations, but also from the influence of subjective factors in political decision-making by the government, parliament, and other government institutions. ; У статті аналізуються сучасні тенденції розвитку інституту політичної опозиції. Розкривається еволюція концептуальних уявлень про сутнісний зміст феномену політичної опозиції. Констатується, що у режимі консолідованої демократії політична опозиція забезпечує зміну політичних сил та елітних груп в управлінні державою, кадрову ротацію в структурах влади, а також здійснення контролю за політичною владою. Натомість у транзитивних політичних режимах роль політичної опозиції істотно зростає. Якість інституту політичної опозиції виначає потенціал демократизації того чи іншого режиму влади. Право на політичну опозицію є одним з засадничих елементів сучасної ліберальної демократії. Можливість відкрито критикувати правлячу еліту, відстоювати свої альтернативні інтереси, пропонувати інші політичні рішення, виборювати владу шляхом участі у політичних виборах гарантується законом. У політиці опозиція визначається як: виступ проти думки більшості або панівної думки в законодавчих, партійних та інших структурах, які декларують свою прихильність демократичним процедурам; протиставлення свого політичного курсу іншому курсу.Важливість інституту політичної опозиції зумовлена тим, що опозиція – це потенційна завтрашня влада. Виначальним моментом є те, яке місце опозиційні сили посідали у системі владних відносин країни, яким шляхом прийшла до влади. Оскільки згодом це відбивається і на самому характері влади, і на тому, наскільки легко і безболісно відбуватиметься зміна влади.Робиться висновок, що за режиму поліархії та у транзитивних режимах дієва, сильна опозиція є запорукою стабільності в роботі усього державного механізму. Існування опозиції створює баланс у політичній системі та захищає режим влади не тільки від авторитарних проявів, але й від впливу суб'єктивних чинників в ухваленні політичних рішень урядом, парламентом та іншими владними інститутами.

The article analyzes the current trends in the development of the institution of political opposition. The evolution of conceptual ideas about the essence of the phenomenon of political opposition is revealed. In a consolidated democracy, the political opposition ensures the change of political forces and elite groups in the management of the state, personnel rotation in government structures, as well as the exercise of control over political power. Instead, in transitive political regimes, the role of the political opposition is growing significantly. The quality of the institution of political opposition precedes the potential for democratization of a particular regime. The right to political opposition is one of the fundamental elements of modern liberal democracy. The ability to openly criticize the ruling elite, to defend their alternative interests, to propose other political solutions, to win power by participating in political elections is guaranteed by law. In politics, opposition is defined as: opposition to the opinion of the majority or the dominant opinion in the legislative, party and other structures that declare their commitment to democratic procedures; contrasting one's political course with another.The importance of the institution of political opposition is due to the fact that the opposition is the potential government of tomorrow. The initial point is what place the opposition forces occupied in the system of power relations of the country, which way it came to power. Because over time, this affects the very nature of power, and how easily and painlessly the change of power will take place.It is concluded that under the regime of polyarchy and in transitive regimes, effective, strong opposition is the key to stability in the work of the entire state mechanism. The existence of the opposition creates a balance in the political system and protects the regime not only from authoritarian manifestations, but also from the influence of subjective factors in political decision-making by the government, parliament, and other government institutions. ; У статті аналізуються сучасні тенденції розвитку інституту політичної опозиції. Розкривається еволюція концептуальних уявлень про сутнісний зміст феномену політичної опозиції. Констатується, що у режимі консолідованої демократії політична опозиція забезпечує зміну політичних сил та елітних груп в управлінні державою, кадрову ротацію в структурах влади, а також здійснення контролю за політичною владою. Натомість у транзитивних політичних режимах роль політичної опозиції істотно зростає. Якість інституту політичної опозиції виначає потенціал демократизації того чи іншого режиму влади. Право на політичну опозицію є одним з засадничих елементів сучасної ліберальної демократії. Можливість відкрито критикувати правлячу еліту, відстоювати свої альтернативні інтереси, пропонувати інші політичні рішення, виборювати владу шляхом участі у політичних виборах гарантується законом. У політиці опозиція визначається як: виступ проти думки більшості або панівної думки в законодавчих, партійних та інших структурах, які декларують свою прихильність демократичним процедурам; протиставлення свого політичного курсу іншому курсу.Важливість інституту політичної опозиції зумовлена тим, що опозиція – це потенційна завтрашня влада. Виначальним моментом є те, яке місце опозиційні сили посідали у системі владних відносин країни, яким шляхом прийшла до влади. Оскільки згодом це відбивається і на самому характері влади, і на тому, наскільки легко і безболісно відбуватиметься зміна влади.Робиться висновок, що за режиму поліархії та у транзитивних режимах дієва, сильна опозиція є запорукою стабільності в роботі усього державного механізму. Існування опозиції створює баланс у політичній системі та захищає режим влади не тільки від авторитарних проявів, але й від впливу суб'єктивних чинників в ухваленні політичних рішень урядом, парламентом та іншими владними інститутами.

Introduction. The modern development of Ukrainian society is characterized by the active implementation of reforms in the social sphere. Changes in standards in higher education, physical culture and sport directly affect students' youth. Modern requirements for physical education and sports require the full functioning of sports clubs of higher education institutions. The sports club becomes the main element of the organizational structure of student sport. Information basis of strategic management of organizations. The goal is to identify and systematize the environmental factors affecting the effectiveness of the functioning of sports clubs of institutions of higher education. Methods. Theoretical analysis and generalization of data of scientific and methodical literature and sources of Internet, analysis of documentary materials, questioning of 14 experts of higher qualification in the field of student sport. Results. The systematization of environmental factors was carried out according to the theory of management and marketing. The subject of the study, given that the macroenvironment, usually, does not have a specific character in relation to a single subject and has a general effect on the organization of any orientation, was limited to the sphere of physical culture and sports. Within these limits, the environment of the sports club was divided into basic general factors of the sphere of physical culture and sport, specific factors of student sports and physical education of students, factors of the environment of sports clubs in institutions of higher education. In each group, the factors are divided into political, economic, social, technological and international. Conclusions. A holistic view of the environment of sports clubs of institutions of higher education has been formed.

Children are not born intractable. Behavioral problems should be taken as a result of the impact on society, social institutions and education for the children not favorable external factors. The reasons for this negative impact may be a variety of social, historical, political and economic causes such as civil (and not only) wars, the economic decline of the state, the loss of cultural norms, values and ideals, negative influence of the media etc. Today, the problem of behavior problems, educational neglect of children is not solved. Practice shows that among pupils of secondary schools is becoming increasingly intractable. The problem of "difficult" classes becomes particularly painful not only for the city but for many rural schools. To overcome this situation is needed well-coordinated and systematic work of school personnel, social workers, psychologists about: learning interests, abilities, aptitudes of difficult students and their involvement in work groups, sports clubs both in school and in school institutions working with parent committees class families intractable pupils disadvantaged families (weapons of pedagogical knowledge, provide specific individual methodological assistance); pay attention to overcoming and preventing the failure of students, to work on the gaps of the students, develop their thinking, attention, memory, to form in slow learners skills of rational organization of academic work, apply an individual approach to pupils losing in the educational work.Keywords: behavioral problems, students, deviant behavior, bias, prevention, education, educationally neglected children, pedagogical impact.

The purpose of this article is to examine potential trends in the development of the political system of Ukraine after the end of the Russia-Ukraine war. Social changes always take place taking into account both subjective and objective circumstances. Currently the Ukrainian state relies on three pillars for further transformation of political institutions: 1) the Ukrainian value-mental tradition, 2) our own experience of democratic development in recent decades, 3) the political will to embrace European values. The latter means that Ukraine voluntarily undertook the obligation to meet the Copenhagen criteria, including to demonstrate the stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy, rule of law, human rights and protection of minorities. In the political circles of Ukraine, there is a "plan to restart the state", which boils down to structural changes in the system of public administration. Ukraine needs qualitative changes in the system of political relations, it is necessary to eliminate the contradiction between the form and content of political institutions. Archaic practices, nepotism, eastern methods of holding power by suppressing the opposition, corruption in the state apparatus and purely criminal practices are hidden behind the modern facade. War not only destroys, but also gives impulses for development through the mobilization of the nation's forces. We have a chance to restart political institutions and consolidate new structures born of war. We must pay attention to the institution of national resistance, which, through the movement of territorial defense and the volunteer movement, led to a situation of social filtering. As a result, strata of people crystallized, for whom the public good is higher than selfish interests. It is important not to lose the energy of the masses after the war and to use the patriotic movement to build political institutions.

The article proves that modern Ukrainian students need to have the appropriate qualities and characteristics that are components of their citizenship, civic culture and civic position. It is determined that civic education of students of general secondary education, in contrast to students of other educational institutions, has specific personality traits due to the presence of students with a qualitatively higher level of abilities. It is substantiated that the substantive elements of the education of civic responsibility are: tolerant attitude towards people, regardless of their language, gender, nationality, religion, political beliefs; respect for other people's private property; rule of law and observance of legal norms and laws; active participation in the socio-political life of society. The purpose of the article is to analyze the importance of civic education in the educational process for students of general secondary education. The methodology is based on the general principles and basic modern principles of pedagogical science, psychology, and reflects the relationship of methodological approaches to the study of scientific and methodological views of domestic scientists on the problem of civic education of students of general secondary education. Scientific novelty. It is substantiated that civic education is a necessary component of the educational process in general secondary education institutions. Conclusions. 1. The purpose of civic education is the formation of a conscious citizen, patriot, professional. 2. Civic education is a necessary component of the educational process in general secondary education. 3. There is a need for further development of national standards of citizenship and its implementation in educational practice at the level of formal, non-formal and informal education. 4. Civic maturity is a consequence of the formation of civic competence and culture of students of general secondary education.