Suchergebnisse
Filter
Format
Medientyp
Sprache
Weitere Sprachen
Jahre
41401 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
World Affairs Online
International Justice and International Order
In: Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, Band 22, Heft 2, S. 21
International justice and international enforcement
In: Czech yearbook of international law volume 13 (2022)
An essay on international justice
In: Reports from the Department of Practical Philosophy 6
Darfur and international justice
In: Dissent: a journal devoted to radical ideas and the values of socialism and democracy, S. 13-18
ISSN: 0012-3846
Theories of International Justice
In: British Journal of Political Science, Band 27, Heft 2, S. 273-297
What Is International Justice?
In: Current History, Band 42, Heft 6, S. 598-601
ISSN: 1944-785X
World Affairs Online
International Justice on Trial
In: Current history: a journal of contemporary world affairs, Band 110, Heft 732, S. 32-37
ISSN: 1944-785X
In many instances human rights violations are better confronted as a political problem rather than as an ethical or legal challenge.
The Limits of International Justice
In: World policy journal: WPJ ; a publication of the World Policy Institute, Band 26, Heft 3, S. 91-102
ISSN: 0740-2775
The development of international justice
In: Inter-parliamentary bulletin: official publication of the Inter-Parliamentary Bureau, Band 11, S. 269-280
ISSN: 0020-5079
International Justice, War Crimes and Terrorism
In: Social research: an international quarterly, Band 69, Heft 4, S. 1019-1030
ISSN: 0037-783X
Bosnia-Hercegovina and International Justice: Past Failures and Future Solutions
In: East European politics and societies: EEPS, Band 24, Heft 2, S. 191-205
ISSN: 1533-8371
Three different international courts have determined that genocide took place in Bosnia-Hercegovina in 1992-1995: the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), the International Court of Justice (ICJ), and the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). Yet paradoxically, there has been virtually no punishment of this genocide, while the punishment of lesser war crimes of the Bosnian war has been very limited. The ICTY has convicted only one individual, a lowly deputy corps commander, of a genocide-related offence. The ICJ acquitted Serbia, the state that planned and launched the assault upon Bosnia-Hercegovina in 1992, of genocide and related offences, finding it guilty only of failure to prevent and punish genocide. Although Serb forces were responsible for the overwhelming majority of war crimes, the ICTY prosecution has disproportionately targeted non-Serbs in its indictments and, among Serbs, has disproportionately targeted Bosnian Serbs, with no official of Serbia or Yugoslavia yet convicted of war crimes in Bosnia. This article argues that the meagre results of the international judicial processes vis-à-vis the crimes of the Bosnian war must be sought in the structural failings, poor decision making, and political influences that affected the international courts. It argues that the international courts have failed either to deliver justice to the victims of the war crimes or to promote reconciliation among the peoples of the former Yugoslavia and suggests measures that could be taken to rectify the situation.