A. Scheller delin.; TOBIAS CONRAD LOTTER. Geogr. excudit AUG. VIND.; E. Eichel. Sculps. ; Blatt wahrscheinlich Teil einer Serie vgl. BSB, Einbl. XI,6 und Einbl. XI,8 ; Ill.: Scheller, August, Eichel Emanuel ; Erscheinungsjahr ermittelt aus Inhalt: letzter angeführter Monarch des "IMPERIUM OCCIDENTALE" ist Joseph II., der 1765 zum König gekrönt wurde, zum Verleger vgl. auch BSB, Einbl. XI,8 ; Ausfuehrliche Beschreibung ; Volltext // Exemplar mit der Signatur: München, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek -- Einbl. XI,7
Tekst gratulacyjny wydany przez Friedricha Sieferta, na okoliczność powołania na tron króla Karola II. W 1660 roku parlament angielski wybrał na króla Karola II Stuarta (1660-1685). Za tekstem Sieferta, wiersz "Zustimmender Nachklang" autorstwa sekretarza Christiana Habersack'a. Jest to utwór panegiryczny ku czci Karola II na okoliczność restauracji dynastii Stuartów. Karol II – syn obalonego i ściętego w 1649 Karola I Stuarta, zbiegł z kraju i przebywał przez dziewięć lat poza Anglią. W 1648 r. podjął nieudaną próbę powrotu na tron. Władzę odzyskał w 1660, po śmierci ojca republiki O. Cromwell'a, który przyjął tytuł lorda protektora i ustąpieniu jego syna Ryszarda. W utworze pojawiają się liczne aluzje do wydarzeń i osób współczesnych autorowi – wymieniony jest m. in. generał George Monk, który odegrał kluczową rolę w restauracji monarchii, wzmiankowani są także francuski uczony Claudius Salmacius i słynny pisarz John Milton (Salmacius był autorem druku popierającego króla druku Defensio regia, na który Milton odpowiedział polemiką). Sam Karol II porównany jest zaś m. in. do biblijnego króla Dawida, który ukrywał się przed czyhającym na jego życie Saulem, by ostatecznie triumfalnie wstąpić na tron Izraela. [Przed drukiem F. Sieferta niezwiązana z tytułem karta "Deo Opt. Max. et Memoriae Aeternae [.] Annae [.] Vladislaus IV."(oprawiona omylnie, pochodząca z innego druku) - dotycząca zmarłej w 1625 r. Anny Wazówny (w wieku 57 lat) oraz jej bratanka - polskiego króla Władysława IV (1595-1648) [nieznany autor karty podaje datę śmierci Anny - 08.02.1625 r.]. Druk współoprawny (klocek introligatorski), sygn. Pol.7.III.281-Pol.7.III.352. Format bibliograficzny: 2. Pieczątki: 1, 7, 10, 11, 18. Dawne sygnatury: D.2.Miscell.1. Krawędzie przycięte. Typ oprawy (materiał) – półskórek ; obleczenie – brązowa skóra, papier różowy ; okładziny - tektura ; zdobienia oprawy - tłoczenia ślepe ; pęknięcie zwięzów między blokiem a oprawą, poluzowanie oprawy, uszkodzenie przegubów ; średnie deformacje ; średnie zabrudzenia ; brak zacieków / zaplamień ; średni stopień zainfekowania mikroorganizmami ; niewielkie ubytki spowodowane przez owady. W 2010 r. druk poddano konserwacji zachowawczej w ramach projektu "Konserwacja zachowawcza druków XV-XVII w. Biblioteki Elbląskiej".
The first coherent and handy edition with commentaries of one oft he most important sources for history, administration and religious mentalities of the city of Rome in the 4th century A.D.The collection of pictures, lists and short notes, known as the "Chronography of 354" or the "Calendar of Filocalus" is a calendar handbook for the year 354 C.E. Of the thirteen texts, four are Christian documents; the remaining are witnesses of Roman administration and provide no clue for Christianity, or at times even attestations to the Roman religiosity of the Republic and the Imperial Time. The handbook contents can be distinguished by whether it has pictures or just text. Given the complexity of the present form of its constituents, the calendar handbook is an important source for the politic administrative history of the late-Constantine time, for the history of the transformation of religious mentalities, and for the success of the story of Christianity in the city of Rome. The following texts are especially noteworthy: (1) The consular fasti from the beginning of the consulate up to the year 354 CE, for the Roman History and the families that dominated it; (2) the yearly calendar for those festivals celebrated in late-Constantine time with their political and religio-historical dimension, which influenced the history of everyday life of the city; (3) the Catalogus Liberianus, the oldest Roman book of the popes, which together with the lists of the Deposito episcoporum and the Deposito martyrum, the oldest feriale of any Christian Church, is important for the Church of Rome and its conception of history. Notwithstanding a century-long history of editions and commentaries of the calendar handbook, there is up to the present no connected edition and commentary of the pertinent texts, only critical editions of individual parts. This is related to the complex tradition process and the preserved late manuscripts of the 16th and the 17th century. This poses a range of problems, which this edition and its commentaries tackle: (a) what all was part of the original calendar (b) when did the different texts and their redactions, which lead to the expansions, come into being (c) the perennial research problem of the relationship between the traditional Roman religion and Christianity, for which the texts of the chronographs provide crucial evidence (d) the position of the calendar handbook in the history of book illustration in LateAntiquity. Furthermore, since Mommsen's classical edition, a host of individual problems have been identified, which affect very different scientific endeavours, ranging from the studies of classical antiquities to theology and from cultural sciences to astronomy.
Vol. 2: Fasti Consulares, Praefecti urbis Romae 254 - 354 A.D., Cpomputus Paschalis, Depositio martyrum, Depositio Episcoporum, Catalogus Liberianus - Es handelt sich um die erste zusammenhängende Ausgabe mit Kommentar des Kalenderhandbuches, das mit seinen Texten eine wichtige Quelle zur Geschichte, Verwaltung und zu den religiösen Mentalitäten in der Stadt Rom im 4. Jahrhundert n.Chr. darstellt.
Eingeleitet und zusammengestellt von Hans Martin Schaller ; Text lateinisch ; Literaturverzeichnis Seite 76-[77] ; Volltext // Exemplar mit der Signatur: Augsburg, Universitätsbibliothek -- 01/NM 1100 H673-1
Es handelt sich um die erste zusammenhängende Ausgabe mit Kommentar des Kalenderhandbuches, das mit seinen Texten eine wichtige Quelle zur Geschichte, Verwaltung und zu den religiösen Mentalitäten in der Stadt Rom im 4. Jahrhundert n.Chr. darstellt. ; The first coherent and handy edition with commentaries of one oft he most important sources for history, administration and religious mentalities of the city of Rome in the 4th century A.D. ; The collection of pictures, lists and short notes, known as the "Chronography of 354" or the "Calendar of Filocalus" is a calendar handbook for the year 354 C.E. Of the thirteen texts, four are Christian documents; the remaining are witnesses of Roman administration and provide no clue for Christianity, or at times even attestations to the Roman religiosity of the Republic and the Imperial Time. The handbook contents can be distinguished by whether it has pictures or just text. Given the complexity of the present form of its constituents, the calendar handbook is an important source for the politic administrative history of the late-Constantine time, for the history of the transformation of religious mentalities, and for the success of the story of Christianity in the city of Rome. The following texts are especially noteworthy: (1) The consular fasti from the beginning of the consulate up to the year 354 CE, for the Roman History and the families that dominated it; (2) the yearly calendar for those festivals celebrated in late-Constantine time with their political and religio-historical dimension, which influenced the history of everyday life of the city; (3) the Catalogus Liberianus, the oldest Roman book of the popes, which together with the lists of the Deposito episcoporum and the Deposito martyrum, the oldest feriale of any Christian Church, is important for the Church of Rome and its conception of history. Notwithstanding a century-long history of editions and commentaries of the calendar handbook, there is up to the present no connected edition and commentary of the pertinent texts, only critical editions of individual parts. This is related to the complex tradition process and the preserved late manuscripts of the 16th and the 17th century. This poses a range of problems, which this edition and its commentaries tackle: (a) what all was part of the original calendar (b) when did the different texts and their redactions, which lead to the expansions, come into being (c) the perennial research problem of the relationship between the traditional Roman religion and Christianity, for which the texts of the chronographs provide crucial evidence (d) the position of the calendar handbook in the history of book illustration in LateAntiquity. Furthermore, since Mommsen's classical edition, a host of individual problems have been identified, which affect very different scientific endeavours, ranging from the studies of classical antiquities to theology and from cultural sciences to astronomy. Vol. 2: Fasti Consulares, Praefecti urbis Romae 254 - 354 A.D., Cpomputus Paschalis, Depositio martyrum, Depositio Episcoporum, Catalogus Liberianus
